• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的药物与机动车碰撞责任风险:一项基于人群的病例对照研究。

Medications and risk of motor vehicle collision responsibility in British Columbia, Canada: a population-based case-control study.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Department of Emergency Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Lancet Public Health. 2021 Jun;6(6):e374-e385. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00027-X. Epub 2021 Apr 20.

DOI:10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00027-X
PMID:33887232
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many medications impair driving skills yet their influence on collision risk remains uncertain. We aimed to systematically investigate the risk of collision responsibility associated with common classes of prescription medications.

METHODS

In this population-based case-control study we analysed linked driving and health records in British Columbia, Canada from Jan 1, 1997, to Dec 31, 2016. The study cohort included all drivers involved in an incident collision (defined as first collision after 3 collision-free years) that resulted in a police report. We scored police collision reports and classified drivers as responsible for the collision (cases) or not responsible (controls); drivers with indeterminate scores were excluded. We used logistic regression to determine odds of collision responsibility in drivers with current prescriptions for medications of interest versus drivers without prescriptions. To explore whether risk of collision responsibility was related to medication effect or driver factors, we compared risk in current medication users versus past users. To study whether drivers developed tolerance to medication effects, we compared risk in new (first 30 days of a prescription) versus established users.

FINDINGS

During the study period, 4 906 925 drivers had their driving licence linked to health records; of these drivers, 747 662 unique drivers were involved in 837 919 incident collisions between Jan 1, 2000, and Dec 31, 2016. 382 685 drivers responsible for the collision (cases) and 332 259 drivers not responsible (controls) were included in the final analysis; 122 975 drivers with indeterminate responsibility were excluded. We found increased risk of collision responsibility in drivers prescribed sedating antipsychotics (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1·35 [98·75% CI 1·25-1·46]), long-acting benzodiazepines (aOR 1·30 [1·22-1·38]), short-acting benzodiazepines (aOR 1·25 [1·20-1·31]), and high-potency opioids (aOR 1·24 [1·17-1·30]). Among medications used for medical indications, the highest risk was seen in drivers prescribed neurological medications: cholinergic drugs (aOR 1·83 [1·39-2·40]), anticholinergic agents for Parkinson's disease (aOR 1·45 [1·08-1·96]), dopaminergic agents (aOR 1·20 [1·04-1·38]), and anticonvulsants (aOR 1·20 [1·14-1·26]). People currently taking benzodiazepines, non-sedating antidepressants, high-potency opioids, and anticonvulsants had increased risk compared with past users, and we did not find increased risk in new compared with established users of these drugs.

INTERPRETATION

Drivers prescribed benzodiazepines or high-potency opioids are at increased risk of being responsible for collisions and this risk does not decrease over time. Several other classes of medications are associated with increased risk, but this association might be independent of medication effect. These findings can guide medication warnings and prescription choices and inform public education campaigns targeting impaired driving.

FUNDING

Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

摘要

背景

许多药物会损害驾驶技能,但它们对碰撞风险的影响仍不确定。我们旨在系统地研究与常见处方药物类别相关的碰撞责任风险。

方法

在这项基于人群的病例对照研究中,我们分析了加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省从 1997 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 12 月 31 日的驾驶和健康记录的关联。研究队列包括所有因第一次碰撞前连续 3 年无碰撞而导致警方报告的事故碰撞(定义为首次碰撞)的驾驶员。我们对警方碰撞报告进行评分,并将驾驶员分类为对碰撞负责(病例)或不负责任(对照);得分不确定的驾驶员被排除在外。我们使用逻辑回归来确定当前使用有研究意义的药物的驾驶员与无处方的驾驶员相比,发生碰撞责任的可能性。为了探究碰撞责任风险是否与药物作用或驾驶员因素有关,我们比较了当前药物使用者与过去使用者之间的风险。为了研究驾驶员是否对药物作用产生耐受性,我们比较了新处方(处方的前 30 天)使用者与已建立使用者之间的风险。

结果

在研究期间,有 4906925 名驾驶员的驾驶执照与健康记录相关联;在这些驾驶员中,有 747662 名唯一驾驶员在 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 12 月 31 日期间发生了 837919 起事故碰撞。382685 名负责碰撞的驾驶员(病例)和 332259 名无责任驾驶员(对照)被纳入最终分析;122975 名责任不确定的驾驶员被排除在外。我们发现,服用镇静抗精神病药物(调整后的优势比[aOR]1.35[98.75%CI 1.25-1.46])、长效苯二氮䓬类药物(aOR 1.30[1.22-1.38])、短效苯二氮䓬类药物(aOR 1.25[1.20-1.31])和高效阿片类药物(aOR 1.24[1.17-1.30])的驾驶员发生碰撞责任的风险增加。在用于医疗适应症的药物中,我们发现服用神经科药物的驾驶员风险最高:胆碱能药物(aOR 1.83[1.39-2.40])、帕金森病的抗胆碱能药物(aOR 1.45[1.08-1.96])、多巴胺能药物(aOR 1.20[1.04-1.38])和抗惊厥药(aOR 1.20[1.14-1.26])。与过去使用者相比,目前服用苯二氮䓬类药物、非镇静性抗抑郁药、高效阿片类药物和抗惊厥药的驾驶员发生碰撞的风险增加,我们没有发现这些药物的新使用者与已建立使用者之间的风险增加。

解释

服用苯二氮䓬类药物或高效阿片类药物的驾驶员发生碰撞的风险增加,而且这种风险不会随着时间的推移而降低。还有其他几类药物与增加的风险相关,但这种关联可能与药物作用无关。这些发现可以指导药物警示和处方选择,并为针对驾驶障碍的公众教育活动提供信息。

资助

加拿大卫生研究院。

相似文献

1
Medications and risk of motor vehicle collision responsibility in British Columbia, Canada: a population-based case-control study.加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的药物与机动车碰撞责任风险:一项基于人群的病例对照研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Jun;6(6):e374-e385. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00027-X. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
2
Prescription medication use as a risk factor for motor vehicle collisions: a responsibility study.处方药物使用与机动车碰撞的相关性:一项责任研究。
Inj Prev. 2021 Aug;27(4):324-330. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2020-043840. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
3
Cannabis use as a risk factor for causing motor vehicle crashes: a prospective study.大麻使用作为导致机动车事故的风险因素:一项前瞻性研究。
Addiction. 2019 Sep;114(9):1616-1626. doi: 10.1111/add.14663. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
4
Schizophrenia, antipsychotic treatment adherence and driver responsibility for motor vehicle crash: a population-based retrospective study in British Columbia, Canada.精神分裂症、抗精神病药物治疗依从性与机动车事故驾驶员责任:加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省基于人群的回顾性研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 30;14(7):e080609. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080609.
5
Effects of benzodiazepines, antidepressants and opioids on driving: a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological and experimental evidence.苯二氮䓬类药物、抗抑郁药和阿片类药物对驾驶的影响:流行病学和实验证据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Drug Saf. 2011 Feb 1;34(2):125-56. doi: 10.2165/11539050-000000000-00000.
6
Identifying motorist characteristics associated with youth bicycle-motor vehicle collisions.识别与青少年自行车-机动车碰撞相关的驾驶者特征。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(7):744-748. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1639680. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
7
Medication use and the risk of motor vehicle collision in West Virginia drivers 65 years of age and older: a case-crossover study.西弗吉尼亚州65岁及以上驾驶员的药物使用与机动车碰撞风险:一项病例交叉研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Mar 15;9:166. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-1974-x.
8
Identifying modifiable factors related to novice adolescent driver fault in motor vehicle collisions.识别与新手青少年驾驶员在机动车事故中过失相关的可修正因素。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(6):437-442. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2021.1923700. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
9
Adaptation of a Canadian culpability scoring tool to Alberta police traffic collision report data.将加拿大罪责评分工具改编为艾伯塔省警方交通碰撞报告数据。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(3):270-275. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1567916. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
10
Police documentation of drug use in injured drivers: Implications for monitoring and preventing drug-impaired driving.警察对受伤驾驶员吸毒行为的记录:对监测和预防毒驾的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Sep;118:200-206. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.02.018. Epub 2018 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Antipsychotic treatment adherence and motor vehicle crash among drivers with schizophrenia: a case-crossover study.精神分裂症患者司机的抗精神病药物治疗依从性与机动车碰撞事故:一项病例交叉研究。
CMAJ. 2025 Jun 8;197(22):E612-E619. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.250020.
2
Prevalence of Impairing Substance Use in Injured Drivers.受伤驾驶员中有害物质使用的患病率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e256379. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.6379.
3
A scoping review of motor vehicle operator performance assessments for benzodiazepine receptor agonists.
苯二氮䓬受体激动剂机动车驾驶员性能评估的范围综述
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024 Nov 9;16:100538. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100538. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Medication Changes Among Older Drivers Involved in Motor Vehicle Crashes.老年驾驶员在机动车事故中的用药变化。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2438338. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.38338.
5
Risk of motor vehicle accidents with profound injuries in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a nationwide, population-based cohort study.强直性脊柱炎患者发生重伤机动车事故的风险:一项基于全国人群的队列研究。
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2024 Sep 20;16:1759720X241273039. doi: 10.1177/1759720X241273039. eCollection 2024.
6
Schizophrenia, antipsychotic treatment adherence and driver responsibility for motor vehicle crash: a population-based retrospective study in British Columbia, Canada.精神分裂症、抗精神病药物治疗依从性与机动车事故驾驶员责任:加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省基于人群的回顾性研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 30;14(7):e080609. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080609.
7
Nonbenzodiazepine hypnotics and police-reported motor vehicle crash risk among older adults: a sequential target trial emulation.非苯二氮䓬类催眠药与老年人警方报告的机动车碰撞风险:一项序贯目标试验模拟研究
Am J Epidemiol. 2025 Mar 4;194(3):662-673. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae168.
8
Enhancing prediction and analysis of UK road traffic accident severity using AI: Integration of machine learning, econometric techniques, and time series forecasting in public health research.利用人工智能增强英国道路交通事故严重程度的预测与分析:公共卫生研究中机器学习、计量经济学技术与时间序列预测的整合
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 2;10(7):e28547. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28547. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.
9
Changes in the burden of medications that may impair driving among older adults before and after a motor vehicle crash.机动车碰撞事故前后老年人中可能影响驾驶的药物负担变化。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Feb;72(2):444-455. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18643. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
10
Addressing the Complex Driving Needs of an Aging Population.满足老年人口复杂的驾驶需求。
JAMA. 2023 Sep 26;330(12):1187-1188. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.16093.