Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, U.S.A..
Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, U.S.A.
Arthroscopy. 2021 Sep;37(9):2953-2959. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.03.066. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
The purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence of spin in the abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatments for rotator cuff tears and whether various study and publishing journal characteristics were associated with the presence of spin.
A search strategy was developed for Ovid MEDLINE and Ovid Embase to retrieve systematic reviews focused on treatments for rotator cuff tears. For an article to be included, it must meet the following criteria: (1) the article must be a systematic review with or without a meta-analysis, (2) the article must pertain to the treatment of rotator cuff tears, (3) the article must only contain human subjects, and (4) the article must be accessible in English. Systematic reviews were analyzed for spin using a previously developed classification scheme in a masked, duplicate manner. Binary logistic regression was used to examine independent associations via unadjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals between the presence of spin and study characteristics.
Search queries returned 932 articles, of which 121 systematic reviews and meta-analyses were eligible. A total of 36.4% (44/121) of systematic reviews contained spin. Among the general characteristics evaluated, there were no correlations with spin.
Spin was present in more than one-third of systematic reviews and meta-analyses covering rotator cuff tear treatments. Spin was not associated with any general study or journal characteristics, which indicates that clinicians must be aware of the potential presence of spin in all such abstracts.
Clinicians rely on systematic reviews and meta-analyses, especially abstracts of these articles, to provide succinct guidance on best practices in patient care. The presence of spin could adversely affect patient care; thus, steps should be taken to improve the reporting quality of abstracts on rotator cuff tear treatment.
本研究旨在确定肩袖撕裂治疗的系统评价和荟萃分析摘要中存在旋转的比例,以及各种研究和出版期刊特征是否与旋转的存在相关。
制定了 Ovid MEDLINE 和 Ovid Embase 的检索策略,以检索针对肩袖撕裂治疗的系统评价。符合以下标准的文章纳入研究:(1)必须是包含或不包含荟萃分析的系统评价;(2)必须与肩袖撕裂的治疗有关;(3)必须仅包含人体研究对象;(4)必须以英文发表。采用先前开发的分类方案,对系统评价进行旋转分析,以盲法、重复的方式进行。采用二元逻辑回归,通过未调整的优势比和 95%置信区间,在不调整的情况下,对旋转与研究特征之间的独立关联进行检验。
检索查询返回 932 篇文章,其中 121 篇系统评价和荟萃分析符合条件。共有 36.4%(44/121)的系统评价存在旋转。在所评估的一般特征中,与旋转无相关性。
在涵盖肩袖撕裂治疗的系统评价和荟萃分析中,超过三分之一的存在旋转。旋转与任何一般的研究或期刊特征均无关联,这表明临床医生必须意识到所有此类摘要中都可能存在旋转。
临床医生依赖系统评价和荟萃分析,尤其是这些文章的摘要,为患者护理的最佳实践提供简洁的指导。旋转的存在可能会对患者护理产生不利影响;因此,应采取措施提高肩袖撕裂治疗摘要的报告质量。