Telang Sahil S, Podosin Mallory A, Fathi Amir, Kotlier Jacob L, Feingold Cailan L, Alluri Ram K, Liu Joseph N
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Global Spine J. 2025 Feb 19:21925682251322427. doi: 10.1177/21925682251322427.
Systematic Review.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses that aggregate data on the intrawound application of vancomycin for surgical site infection (SSI) prophylaxis in spine surgeries are at an increased risk of spin, the overstating of beneficial effects of an intervention. The purpose of this study was to identify studies that coalesce outcomes of intrawound vancomycin SSI prophylaxis in spine surgeries and define the prevalence and types of spin in the identified literature. Secondarily, this study aimed to identify patterns within study characteristics that were associated with certain spin types.
This study was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A search was performed in 4 databases (PubMed, SCOPUS, Medline and Cochrane) for systematic reviews and meta-analyses on intrawound vancomycin use for SSI prophylaxis in spine surgeries. Two authors independently assessed studies for inclusion criteria and then aggregated study characteristics: titles, publication journal and year, authors, level of evidence, etc. Each study was subsequently evaluated for the presence of 15 different spin types. Statistical analysis was performed for patterns between spin prevalence and study characteristics.
From the database search, 18 studies met the inclusion criteria. In total, 13 studies (72%) were found to have spin. The most common types of spin identified were spin type 9 ("Conclusion claims the beneficial effect of the experimental treatment despite reporting bias"), found in 9 (50.00%) studies and type 3 ("Selective reporting of or overemphasis on efficacy outcomes or analysis favoring the beneficial effect of the experimental intervention"), found in 7 (38.89%) studies.
There is a high prevalence of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the intrawound application of vancomycin for SSI prophylaxis in spine surgery. Our analysis demonstrated that studies tended to selectively report positive findings while minimizing negative outcomes within abstracts.
系统评价。
系统评价和荟萃分析汇总了脊柱手术中伤口内应用万古霉素预防手术部位感染(SSI)的数据,其夸大干预有益效果的倾向性风险增加。本研究的目的是识别汇总脊柱手术中伤口内应用万古霉素预防SSI结果的研究,并确定已识别文献中倾向性的发生率和类型。其次,本研究旨在识别与某些倾向性类型相关的研究特征模式。
本研究按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南进行。在4个数据库(PubMed、SCOPUS、Medline和Cochrane)中检索关于脊柱手术中伤口内应用万古霉素预防SSI的系统评价和荟萃分析。两位作者独立评估研究的纳入标准,然后汇总研究特征:标题、发表期刊和年份、作者、证据水平等。随后对每项研究评估15种不同倾向性类型的存在情况。对倾向性发生率与研究特征之间的模式进行统计分析。
通过数据库检索,18项研究符合纳入标准。总共发现13项研究(72%)存在倾向性。识别出的最常见倾向性类型是第9型(“尽管存在报告偏倚,但结论声称实验性治疗具有有益效果”),在9项(50.00%)研究中出现;以及第3型(“选择性报告或过度强调疗效结果或分析偏向实验性干预的有益效果”),在7项(38.89%)研究中出现。
关于脊柱手术中伤口内应用万古霉素预防SSI的系统评价和荟萃分析中,倾向性发生率很高。我们的分析表明,研究倾向于在摘要中选择性报告阳性结果,同时尽量减少阴性结果。