Suppr超能文献

危急重症患者的紧急交接。系统综述。

Emergency handover of critical patients. A systematic review.

机构信息

Hospital de Tortosa Verge de la Cinta, Catalan Institute of Health, Pere Virgili Institute, Carretera Esplanetes, 14, 43500 Tortosa, Tarragona, Spain; Nursing Department, Universitat Rovira Virgili, Campus Terres de l'Ebre, Avenue Remolins, 13-15, 43500 Tortosa, Tarragona, Spain.

Nursing Department, Universitat Rovira Virgili, Campus Terres de l'Ebre, Avenue Remolins, 13-15, 43500 Tortosa, Tarragona, Spain; Department of Pathology, Hospital de Tortosa Verge de la Cinta, Catalan Institute of Health, Pere Virgili Institute, Carretera Esplanetes, 14, 43500, Tortosa, Tarragona, Spain.

出版信息

Int Emerg Nurs. 2021 May;56:100997. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2021.100997. Epub 2021 Apr 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emergency handover of critical patients is used to describe the moment of union between prehospital and hospital health team. However, the literature shows several definitions leading to great heterogeneity.

PURPOSE

To study the emergency handover of critical patients between two critical-emergency care wards performed by emergency nurses worldwide and to identify the features of these processes.

METHODS

We conducted an integrative review in eleven databases published from 2010 to 2019. Quality criteria and PRISMA checklist were applied. The protocol is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020182335).

RESULTS

A total of 22 studies included and the following factors were identified: variability vs standardization, identification, professionals' behavior, localization, environmental factors, patient participation, clinical records, education/training, responsability, and communication.

CONCLUSIONS

The actual emergency handover occurs under conditions quite contrary to those recommended by experts so that it is neither safe nor effective, leading a serious problem for patient safety and quality care.

摘要

背景

危重症患者的紧急交接用于描述院前和院内急救团队联合的时刻。然而,文献中有多种定义,导致了很大的异质性。

目的

研究全球急救护士在两个重症监护病房之间对危重症患者的紧急交接情况,并确定这些交接过程的特征。

方法

我们在 2010 年至 2019 年期间在 11 个数据库中进行了综合评价。应用了质量标准和 PRISMA 清单。该方案已在 PROSPERO(CRD42020182335)中注册。

结果

共纳入 22 项研究,确定了以下因素:可变性与标准化、识别、专业人员行为、定位、环境因素、患者参与、临床记录、教育/培训、责任和沟通。

结论

实际的紧急交接情况与专家推荐的情况大相径庭,因此既不安全也无效,严重影响患者安全和护理质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验