• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

痴呆症照顾者的关怀目标与对延长生命治疗的偏好之间存在差异。

Discordance between dementia caregivers' goal of care and preference for life-extending treatments.

机构信息

Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.

Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.

出版信息

Age Ageing. 2021 Jun 28;50(4):1382-1390. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afab049.

DOI:10.1093/ageing/afab049
PMID:33890622
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many older adults with severe dementia receive potentially life-extending treatments even when caregivers do not wish to prolong their life inappropriately.

OBJECTIVE

Explore factors that influence caregiver preferences for potentially life-extending treatments for older adults with severe dementia, and reasons for discordance between overall end-of-life care goal and treatment preferences.

DESIGN

Semi-structured in-depth interviews asking caregivers their overall end-of-life care goal for older adults and preferences for intravenous (IV) antibiotics, tube feeding and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 26 caregivers of community-dwelling older adults with severe dementia in Singapore.

APPROACH

Reflexive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Most caregivers' (77%) overall end-of-life care goal was 'no life extension'. Yet, 80% preferred IV antibiotics for a life-threatening infection, 60% preferred tube feeding and 45% preferred CPR. Caregivers preferred these treatments because they (1) perceived letting go by withholding treatments as unethical, (2) felt they had no choice as they deferred to the health care provider, (3) wanted to alleviate suffering rather than extend life and (4) desired trying minimally invasive treatments that had the potential to be withdrawn. Themes explaining discordance were (1) feared regret about making the 'wrong' decision, (2) considered treatments to address immediate needs even when long-term goal did not match providing that treatment and (3) anticipated disagreement with other family members on overall goal of care.

CONCLUSION

To reduce discordance between caregivers' overall end-of-life care goal and preferences for life-extending treatments, clinicians can use a shared decision-making approach involving discussions of both their overall end-of-life care goal and treatment preferences.

摘要

背景

许多患有严重痴呆症的老年人即使在照顾者不希望不适当地延长其生命的情况下,也会接受可能延长生命的治疗。

目的

探讨影响照顾者对患有严重痴呆症的老年人进行潜在延长生命治疗的偏好的因素,以及整体临终关怀目标与治疗偏好之间不一致的原因。

设计

半结构化深度访谈,询问照顾者对患有严重痴呆症的老年人的整体临终关怀目标以及对静脉(IV)抗生素、管饲和心肺复苏(CPR)的偏好。

参与者

新加坡 26 名居住在社区的患有严重痴呆症的老年人的照顾者。

方法

反思性主题分析。

结果

大多数照顾者(77%)的整体临终关怀目标是“不延长生命”。然而,80%的人更喜欢在发生威胁生命的感染时使用 IV 抗生素,60%的人更喜欢管饲,45%的人更喜欢 CPR。照顾者更喜欢这些治疗方法,因为他们 (1) 认为不提供治疗而放弃治疗是不道德的,(2) 感到他们别无选择,只能听从医疗保健提供者的意见,(3) 希望减轻痛苦而不是延长生命,以及 (4) 希望尝试有潜力被撤回的微创治疗。解释不一致的主题是 (1) 担心做出“错误”决定的遗憾,(2) 认为治疗方法可以解决当前的需求,即使长期目标与提供治疗方法不匹配,以及 (3) 预计在整体护理目标上与其他家庭成员存在分歧。

结论

为了减少照顾者的整体临终关怀目标与延长生命治疗偏好之间的不一致,临床医生可以使用一种共同决策方法,涉及他们的整体临终关怀目标和治疗偏好的讨论。

相似文献

1
Discordance between dementia caregivers' goal of care and preference for life-extending treatments.痴呆症照顾者的关怀目标与对延长生命治疗的偏好之间存在差异。
Age Ageing. 2021 Jun 28;50(4):1382-1390. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afab049.
2
Caregiver Preference for Tube Feeding in Community-Dwelling Persons with Severe Dementia.社区居住的重度痴呆患者管饲喂养的照顾者偏好。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Oct;68(10):2264-2269. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16641. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
3
Advance Care Planning in Dementia: Do Family Carers Know the Treatment Preferences of People with Early Dementia?痴呆症患者的预先护理计划:家庭护理人员是否了解早期痴呆症患者的治疗偏好?
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 13;11(7):e0159056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159056. eCollection 2016.
4
Caregivers' End-of-Life Care Goals for Persons with Severe Dementia Change Over Time.照顾者对严重痴呆症患者的临终关怀目标随时间而变化。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2023;93(3):967-975. doi: 10.3233/JAD-221161.
5
Family Caregiver Perspectives on Suffering of Persons With Severe Dementia: A Qualitative Study.家庭照顾者对严重痴呆症患者痛苦的看法:一项定性研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Jul;62(1):20-27.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.11.021. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
6
The attitudes of Chinese family caregivers of older people with dementia towards life sustaining treatments.中国老年痴呆症患者家庭照料者对维持生命治疗的态度。
J Adv Nurs. 2007 May;58(3):256-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04230.x.
7
": Qualitative interviews with bereaved caregivers reveal complexity in measuring goal-concordant care at the end of life.对失去亲人的照顾者进行的定性访谈揭示了在衡量临终时目标一致的护理方面的复杂性。
Palliat Med. 2022 Apr;36(4):742-750. doi: 10.1177/02692163221078472. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
8
Terminally Ill Taiwanese Cancer Patients' and Family Caregivers' Agreement on Patterns of Life-Sustaining Treatment Preferences Is Poor to Fair and Declines Over a Decade: Results From Two Independent Cross-Sectional Studies.晚期台湾癌症患者及其家庭照顾者在维持生命治疗偏好模式上的一致性较差且在十年间呈下降趋势:两项独立横断面研究的结果
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Jul;54(1):35-45.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.02.013. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
9
Perceived unmet needs of informal caregivers of people with dementia in Singapore.新加坡痴呆症患者的非正式照护者的未满足需求感知。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2013 Oct;25(10):1605-19. doi: 10.1017/S1041610213001051. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
10
A Decade of Changes in Family Caregivers' Preferences for Life-Sustaining Treatments for Terminally Ill Cancer Patients at End of Life in the Context of a Family-Oriented Society.在以家庭为导向的社会背景下,临终癌症患者生命末期家庭照顾者对维持生命治疗的偏好变化十年
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 May;51(5):907-915.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.12.326. Epub 2016 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Goals of care discussions and treatment limitation decisions in European acute geriatric units: a one-day cross-sectional study.欧洲急性老年病科的照护目标讨论与治疗限制决策:一项为期一天的横断面研究。
Age Ageing. 2025 Feb 2;54(2). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf026.
2
Palliative Care in Early Dementia.早期痴呆症的姑息治疗
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Sep;68(3):e206-e227. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.05.028. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
3
A palliative care goals model for people with dementia and their family: Consensus achieved in an international Delphi study.
痴呆症患者及其家属的姑息治疗目标模型:国际 Delphi 研究中达成的共识。
Palliat Med. 2024 Apr;38(4):457-470. doi: 10.1177/02692163241234579.
4
"What Is the Most Important to Them?" Swiss Health Care Proxies, Nurses, and Physicians Discuss Planning Practices for Aged Care Residents Who No Longer Have Medical Decision-Making Capacity.“对他们来说最重要的是什么?”瑞士的医疗保健代理人、护士和医生讨论了为不再具备医疗决策能力的老年护理居民制定规划的实践。
Gerontology. 2024;70(2):173-183. doi: 10.1159/000535455. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
5
The dialectics of enteral nutrition in advanced dementia.晚期痴呆患者肠内营养的辩证法
Singapore Med J. 2025 Jul 1;66(7):373-375. doi: 10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2021-320. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
6
Co-design development of a decision guide on eating and drinking for people with severe dementia during acute hospital admissions.共同设计制定一个针对急性住院期间严重痴呆症患者饮食的决策指南。
Health Expect. 2023 Apr;26(2):613-629. doi: 10.1111/hex.13672. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
7
Communication between the multidisciplinary team and families regarding nutrition and hydration for people with severe dementia in acute hospitals: a qualitative study.多学科团队与家庭就急性医院严重痴呆症患者的营养和水合作用进行沟通:定性研究。
Age Ageing. 2022 Nov 2;51(11). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac230.
8
A prospective cohort study assessing aggressive interventions at the end-of-life among patients with solid metastatic cancer.一项针对实体转移性癌症患者生命末期积极干预措施的前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 May 16;21(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-00970-z.