From G.Re.T.A., the Group for Reconstructive and Therapeutic Advancements; the Department of Plastic Surgery, National Cancer Institute "Regina Elena"; the Multidisciplinary Breast Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Cannizzaro; and Breast Reconstructive Surgery, Valduce Hospital.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 May 1;147(5S):31S-38S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008043.
The authors reviewed the available evidence on revision surgery following implant-based breast surgery with the aim of investigating whether any difference in the surgical approach should be proposed if the patient has a textured device. They included in their review 31 studies presenting different approaches for revision surgery following implant-based breast surgery (both aesthetic and reconstructive), with a level of evidence ranging from 4 to 5. None of the included studies proposed different surgical approaches for revision surgery in patients carrying textured devices. The authors conclude that no different surgical attitudes in revision surgery following implant-based breast surgery should be adopted if the patient has a textured device according to the available evidence, when a correct approach is performed to face the complication or adverse event, following a thorough preoperative study of the patient with the proper diagnostic tools.
作者回顾了基于植入物的乳房手术后进行翻修手术的现有证据,旨在研究如果患者使用纹理设备,是否应该提出任何不同的手术方法。他们的综述包括 31 项研究,这些研究展示了基于植入物的乳房手术后(包括美容和重建)进行翻修手术的不同方法,证据水平从 4 到 5 不等。没有一项纳入的研究提出了在携带纹理设备的患者中进行翻修手术时应采用不同的手术方法。作者得出结论,根据现有证据,如果患者使用纹理设备,在对并发症或不良事件进行正确处理并在术前对患者进行彻底研究并使用适当的诊断工具后,基于植入物的乳房手术后进行翻修手术时,不应采取不同的手术态度。