Suppr超能文献

LR-M 型肝癌的特征和早期复发:与 LR-4 或 5 型肝癌的比较。

Characteristics and Early Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinomas Categorized as LR-M: Comparison with Those Categorized as LR-4 or 5.

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Nov;54(5):1446-1454. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27650. Epub 2021 Apr 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

According to the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS), the LI-RADS category M (LR-M), which are probably or definitely malignant but are not specific for hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), does not exclude HCCs. A gap in knowledge remains, including their characteristics and recurrence of HCCs categorized as LR-M.

PURPOSE

To compare the characteristics of HCCs categorized as LR-M with HCCs categorized as LR-4 or LR-5 (LR-4/5) using the LI-RADS version 2018 and evaluate the relationship of these categories with the risk of early recurrence after curative resections of single HCCs.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

SUBJECTS

Two hundred and eighty-one patients (mean age, 57 years; 191 men and 90 women) who underwent curative resections for single HCCs and preoperative contrast-enhanced MRI between 2015 and 2017.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3T Dual gradient-echo T WI with in- and opposed-phase, turbo spin-echo T WI, diffusion-weighted echo-planar images, and three-dimensional gradient-echo T WI before and after administration of contrast agent.

ASSESSMENT

MRI features according to the LI-RADS version 2018 were evaluated and LI-RADS category were assigned for each observation. Clinical, imaging, and histopathological features were compared based on LI-RADS categorization. Early recurrence rates (<2 years) and associated factors were also evaluated.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Fisher's exact test, two-sample t test after satisfying assumption of normality through Shapiro-Wilk test, Fleiss κ coefficient, Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank test.

RESULTS

Forty-one HCCs (14.6%) were categorized as LR-M and 240 HCCs (85.4%) were categorized as LR-4/5. LR-M HCCs showed poorer differentiation than LR-4/5 HCCs. In the multivariate analysis, the LR-M category was an independent predictor for early recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.904; 95% confidence interval, 1.024-3.542; P < 0.05). Early recurrence rates were significantly higher in patients with LR-M HCCs than in patients with LR-4/5 HCCs (32.0% vs. 18.4%, respectively, P < 0 05).

DATA CONCLUSION

Compared to LR-4/5 HCCs, LR-M HCCs were associated with poorer tumor differentiation and higher early recurrence rates after curative resections of single HCCs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Technical Efficacy Stage: 2.

摘要

背景

根据肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS),LI-RADS 类别 M(LR-M)可能或肯定为恶性,但对肝细胞癌(HCC)不具有特异性,不能排除 HCC。目前仍存在知识空白,包括这些被归类为 LR-M 的 HCC 的特征和 HCC 复发情况。

目的

使用 LI-RADS 版本 2018 比较被归类为 LR-M 的 HCC 与被归类为 LR-4 或 LR-5(LR-4/5)的 HCC 的特征,并评估这些类别与单个 HCC 根治性切除术后早期复发的风险之间的关系。

研究类型

回顾性。

受试者

281 名接受单发性 HCC 根治性切除术并于 2015 年至 2017 年期间进行术前对比增强 MRI 的患者(平均年龄 57 岁;191 名男性和 90 名女性)。

场强/序列:3T 双梯度回波 TWI 同相位和反相位、涡轮自旋回波 TWI、扩散加权回波平面成像,以及三维梯度回波 TWI 于造影剂给药前后。

评估

根据 LI-RADS 版本 2018 评估 MRI 特征,并为每个观察结果分配 LI-RADS 类别。基于 LI-RADS 分类比较临床、影像学和组织病理学特征。还评估了早期复发率(<2 年)及其相关因素。

统计学检验

Fisher 确切检验,Shapiro-Wilk 检验后满足正态性假设的两样本 t 检验,Fleiss κ 系数,Cox 比例风险回归分析,Kaplan-Meier 法和对数秩检验。

结果

41 个 HCC(14.6%)被归类为 LR-M,240 个 HCC(85.4%)被归类为 LR-4/5。LR-M HCC 的分化程度比 LR-4/5 HCC 差。多因素分析显示,LR-M 类别是早期复发的独立预测因子(危险比,1.904;95%置信区间,1.024-3.542;P<0.05)。LR-M HCC 患者的早期复发率明显高于 LR-4/5 HCC 患者(分别为 32.0%和 18.4%,P<0.05)。

数据结论

与 LR-4/5 HCC 相比,LR-M HCC 与单个 HCC 根治性切除术后肿瘤分化程度较差和早期复发率较高相关。

证据水平

3 技术功效分期:2。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验