Suppr超能文献

高危人群中使用肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)评估肝内胆管癌:MRI诊断及术后生存情况

Assessment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with LI-RADS in the high-risk population: MRI diagnosis and postoperative survival.

作者信息

Sheng Ruofan, Zheng Beixuan, Zhang Yunfei, Yang Chun, Wu Dong, Zhou Jianjun, Zeng Mengsu

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.

Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, 200032, China.

出版信息

Cancer Imaging. 2025 Mar 26;25(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s40644-025-00860-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The precise impact of LI-RADS-defined risk factors on the diagnosis and prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the value of LI-RADS categories and features for iCCA diagnosis, focusing on the diagnostic and prognostic implications of LI-RADS-defined risk factors.

METHODS

Totally 214 high risk patients, including 107 surgically-confirmed solitary iCCAs and 107 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) from two centers were retrospectively enrolled. Clinical and MRI features based on LI-RADS v2018 were compared, and the performance of targetoid features for discriminating iCCA was evaluated. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was compared across different pathologic diagnoses and LI-RADS categories. Multivariate Cox analysis was performed to identify the independent risk factors for RFS.

RESULTS

In the LI-RADS defined high-risk patients, iCCAs differed from HCCs in MRI manifestation. The LR-M category enabled the accurate classification of most iCCAs (89/107, 83.2%), achieving high sensitivity (83.2%), specificity (85.1%), and accuracy (84.1%). The optimal diagnostic performance for iCCA was achieved when at least one targetoid appearance was required for LR-M categorization (AUC = 0.828). Although 26.2% iCCAs presented at least one major feature and 15.0% iCCAs were miscategorized as probably or definitely HCC, only one iCCA case was categorized as LR-5. RFS varied according to both pathologic diagnosis (P = 0.030) and LI-RADS category (P = 0.028), with LI-RADS category demonstrating an independent association with RFS (HR = 1.736, P = 0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

In high-risk patients, iCCAs frequently exhibit HCC major features, leading to miscategorization as probable HCC. However, the LR-5 category remains highly specific for ruling out iCCA. Furthermore, in high-risk patients with solitary resected iCCA or HCC, LI-RADS category enables the prediction of postsurgical prognosis independently from pathological diagnosis.

摘要

背景

肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)定义的风险因素对肝内胆管癌(iCCA)诊断及预后的确切影响尚不清楚。

目的

评估LI-RADS分类及特征对iCCA诊断的价值,重点关注LI-RADS定义的风险因素的诊断及预后意义。

方法

回顾性纳入来自两个中心的214例高危患者,包括107例手术确诊的孤立性iCCA和107例肝细胞癌(HCC)。比较基于LI-RADS v2018的临床和MRI特征,并评估类靶征对鉴别iCCA的效能。比较不同病理诊断和LI-RADS分类的无复发生存期(RFS)。进行多因素Cox分析以确定RFS的独立危险因素。

结果

在LI-RADS定义的高危患者中,iCCA与HCC的MRI表现不同。LR-M类别能够准确分类大多数iCCA(89/107,83.2%),具有较高的敏感性(83.2%)、特异性(85.1%)和准确性(84.1%)。当LR-M分类至少需要一个类靶征表现时,iCCA的诊断效能最佳(AUC = 0.828)。尽管26.2%的iCCA表现出至少一个主要特征,15.0%的iCCA被错误分类为可能或肯定的HCC,但只有1例iCCA病例被分类为LR-5。RFS根据病理诊断(P = 0.030)和LI-RADS分类(P = 0.028)而有所不同,LI-RADS分类显示与RFS存在独立关联(HR = 1.736,P = 0.033)。

结论

在高危患者中,iCCA常表现出HCC的主要特征,导致被错误分类为可能的HCC。然而,LR-5类别对排除iCCA仍具有高度特异性。此外,在接受孤立性切除的iCCA或HCC的高危患者中,LI-RADS分类能够独立于病理诊断预测术后预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ae8/11938583/e3cdb9c21a20/40644_2025_860_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验