• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关注儿童注意控制量表:确认其因子结构和测量不变性。

Attending to the Attentional Control Scale for Children: Confirming its factor structure and measurement invariance.

机构信息

Yale University Child Study Center, New Haven, USA.

Florida International University, Miami, USA.

出版信息

J Anxiety Disord. 2021 May;80:102399. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102399. Epub 2021 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102399
PMID:33892347
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8141040/
Abstract

The Attentional Control Scale for Children (ACS-C) is a widely used self-report questionnaire that measures attentional control in youth. Previous research examined factor-structure and validation of the ACS-C and yielded a 2-factor structure with Attentional Focusing and Attentional Shifting subscales. This study used a confirmatory factor analysis in a large, ethnically diverse sample of clinic-referred anxious youth (N = 442, ages 7-16 years) to compare model fit of three models, the original two-factor model of the ACS-C, a two-factor model of a modified ACS-C (two items re-assigned from Attentional Focusing to Attentional Shifting, three items removed from Attentional Focusing, and two items removed from Attentional Shifting), and a single-factor model. Results reveal best model fit for the two-factor modified ACS-C. This model had strong factorial invariance across sex, partial invariance across ethnicity, and was variant across age. Also, total and subscale scores for the two-factor modified ACS-C correlated with anxiety and depression symptom scale scores, supporting its concurrent validity. Findings confirm the two-factor structure of the modified ACS-C. Future research implications relating to attentional control in children are discussed.

摘要

儿童注意控制量表(ACS-C)是一种广泛使用的自评问卷,用于衡量青少年的注意力控制。先前的研究检验了 ACS-C 的因子结构和验证,并得出了具有注意力集中和注意力转移两个分量表的 2 因素结构。本研究在一个由临床转诊的焦虑青少年组成的大型、种族多样化的样本中(N=442,年龄 7-16 岁),使用验证性因素分析比较了三种模型的拟合优度,即 ACS-C 的原始两因素模型、修改后的 ACS-C 的两因素模型(将两个项目从注意力集中重新分配到注意力转移,从注意力集中中删除三个项目,从注意力转移中删除两个项目)和单因素模型。结果表明,修改后的 ACS-C 的两因素模型具有最佳的模型拟合度。该模型在性别、种族和年龄方面具有较强的因子不变性。此外,两因素修改后的 ACS-C 的总分和分量表得分与焦虑和抑郁症状量表得分相关,支持其同时效度。研究结果证实了修改后的 ACS-C 的两因素结构。讨论了与儿童注意力控制相关的未来研究意义。

相似文献

1
Attending to the Attentional Control Scale for Children: Confirming its factor structure and measurement invariance.关注儿童注意控制量表:确认其因子结构和测量不变性。
J Anxiety Disord. 2021 May;80:102399. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102399. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
2
Attentional Control Scale for Children: Factor Structure and Concurrent Validity Among Children and Adolescents Referred for Anxiety Disorders.儿童注意力控制量表:焦虑症转诊儿童及青少年的因子结构与同时效度
J Clin Psychol. 2017 Apr;73(4):489-499. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22346. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
3
Self reported attentional control with the Attentional Control Scale: factor structure and relationship with symptoms of anxiety and depression.使用注意力控制量表自我报告的注意力控制:结构因素及与焦虑和抑郁症状的关系。
J Anxiety Disord. 2011 Aug;25(6):777-82. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.03.013. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
4
Factor structure and validation of the Attentional Control Scale.注意控制量表的因子结构和验证。
Cogn Emot. 2014 Apr;28(3):433-51. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.835254. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
5
The Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) in the general population: scale structure, reliability, measurement invariance and normative data: a cross-sectional survey.一般人群中的四维症状问卷(4DSQ):量表结构、信度、测量不变性及常模数据:一项横断面调查
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Sep 15;14(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0533-4.
6
Factor Structure, Measurement Invariance, and Concurrent Validity of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire Across Development, Psychopathology, and Culture.《宾夕法尼亚州担忧问卷在发展、精神病理学和文化中的因子结构、测量不变性和同时效度》
Assessment. 2022 Jul;29(5):909-924. doi: 10.1177/1073191121993223. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
7
Validity and Usefulness of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in Carers of People with Dementia: Evidence from Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Concurrent Validity, and Measurement Invariance in a Large Sample.《在痴呆症患者照顾者中使用医院焦虑和抑郁量表的有效性和实用性:来自大样本的验证性因子分析、同时效度和测量不变性的证据》。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017 Nov;25(11):1270-1280. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2017.05.017. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
8
Confirmatory factor analysis and factorial invariance analysis of the adolescent self-report Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: how important are method effects and minor factors?青少年自评 strengths and difficulties questionnaire 的验证性因子分析和因子不变性分析:方法效应和次要因素有多重要?
Br J Clin Psychol. 2011 Jun;50(2):127-44. doi: 10.1348/014466510X498174. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
9
Limited validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in dementia: evidence from a confirmatory factor analysis.痴呆患者中医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)的有效性有限:来自验证性因子分析的证据。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017 Jul;32(7):805-813. doi: 10.1002/gps.4530. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
10
Spanish Validation of the Child Anxiety Life Interference Scale (CALIS-C): Psychometric Properties, Factorial Structure and Factorial Invariance Across Gender.西班牙语版儿童焦虑生活干扰量表(CALIS-C)的验证:心理测量学特性、因子结构和跨性别因子不变性。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2019 Oct;50(5):756-763. doi: 10.1007/s10578-019-00879-4.

引用本文的文献

1
The effectiveness of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for children on anxiety, attentional control, and emotion regulation in children: a study protocol.基于正念的儿童认知疗法对儿童焦虑、注意力控制和情绪调节的有效性:一项研究方案。
Front Pediatr. 2025 Jul 25;13:1459434. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1459434. eCollection 2025.
2
Exploring the role of post-error processing in social anxiety across age.探索错误后处理在不同年龄段社交焦虑中的作用。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2025 Aug;66(8):1223-1233. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.14146. Epub 2025 Mar 10.
3
Attentional Control Accounts for the Association Between Anxiety Sensitivity and Sleep Efficiency in Clinic-Referred Youth.注意控制解释了临床转诊青少年中焦虑敏感性与睡眠效率之间的关联。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2023 Dec 1. doi: 10.1007/s10578-023-01631-9.
4
Attention Training as a Low-Intensity Treatment for Concerning Anxiety in Clinic-Referred Youth.注意训练作为一种低强度治疗方法,用于治疗临床转诊青少年的焦虑问题。
Behav Ther. 2023 Jan;54(1):77-90. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2022.07.004. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
5
The role of attentional shifting in the relation between error monitoring and anxiety in youth.注意转换在青少年错误监测与焦虑关系中的作用。
Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2022 Aug;324:111507. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2022.111507. Epub 2022 Jun 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Using Evaluative Criteria to Review Youth Anxiety Measures, Part I: Self-Report.使用评价标准评估青少年焦虑量表,第一部分:自评。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2021 Jan-Feb;50(1):58-76. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2020.1802736. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
2
Editorial: Attention to Threat in Child Anxiety: Gazing Into the Future While Keeping Sight of the Past.社论:关注儿童焦虑中的威胁:既要看向未来,也要关注过去。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Jan;59(1):33-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.09.019. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
3
Reliability from α to ω: A tutorial.从 α 到 ω 的可靠性:教程。
Psychol Assess. 2019 Dec;31(12):1395-1411. doi: 10.1037/pas0000754. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
4
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Eye-Tracking of Attention to Threat in Child and Adolescent Anxiety.系统评价和荟萃分析:儿童和青少年焦虑中对威胁的眼动追踪。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Jan;59(1):88-99.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.06.006. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
5
Modeling the Relationships Between Metacognitive Beliefs, Attention Control and Symptoms in Children With and Without Anxiety Disorders: A Test of the S-REF Model.模拟有无焦虑症儿童的元认知信念、注意力控制与症状之间的关系:对S-REF模型的检验
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 7;10:1205. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01205. eCollection 2019.
6
Cognitive and attentional vulnerability to depression in youth: A review.青少年抑郁的认知和注意易损性:综述。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2019 Jul;71:63-77. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
7
Anxiety-Linked Attentional Bias: Is It Reliable?焦虑相关注意偏向:它可靠吗?
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2019 May 7;15:529-554. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095505. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
8
The Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED): Informant Discrepancy, Measurement Invariance, and Test-Retest Reliability.儿童焦虑相关情绪障碍筛查表(SCARED):知情者差异、测量不变性和重测信度。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2019 Jun;50(3):473-482. doi: 10.1007/s10578-018-0854-0.
9
Early and late dot-probe attentional bias to mild and high threat pictures: Relations with EEG theta/beta ratio, self-reported trait attentional control, and trait anxiety.早期和晚期点探测注意偏向于轻度和高度威胁图片:与 EEG theta/beta 比值、自我报告的特质注意控制和特质焦虑的关系。
Psychophysiology. 2018 Dec;55(12):e13274. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13274. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
10
Neural Correlates of Attentional Processing of Threat in Youth with and without Anxiety Disorders.注意加工威胁的神经相关性:有与无焦虑障碍的青少年。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2019 Jan;47(1):119-129. doi: 10.1007/s10802-018-0424-8.