• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从国际强迫症移动应用程序数据集看强迫观念的语义联系:大数据分析研究。

Semantic Linkages of Obsessions From an International Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Mobile App Data Set: Big Data Analytics Study.

机构信息

Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 21;23(6):e25482. doi: 10.2196/25482.

DOI:10.2196/25482
PMID:33892466
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8277342/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is characterized by recurrent intrusive thoughts, urges, or images (obsessions) and repetitive physical or mental behaviors (compulsions). Previous factor analytic and clustering studies suggest the presence of three or four subtypes of OCD symptoms. However, these studies have relied on predefined symptom checklists, which are limited in breadth and may be biased toward researchers' previous conceptualizations of OCD.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we examine a large data set of freely reported obsession symptoms obtained from an OCD mobile app as an alternative to uncovering potential OCD subtypes. From this, we examine data-driven clusters of obsessions based on their latent semantic relationships in the English language using word embeddings.

METHODS

We extracted free-text entry words describing obsessions in a large sample of users of a mobile app, NOCD. Semantic vector space modeling was applied using the Global Vectors for Word Representation algorithm. A domain-specific extension, Mittens, was also applied to enhance the corpus with OCD-specific words. The resulting representations provided linear substructures of the word vector in a 100-dimensional space. We applied principal component analysis to the 100-dimensional vector representation of the most frequent words, followed by k-means clustering to obtain clusters of related words.

RESULTS

We obtained 7001 unique words representing obsessions from 25,369 individuals. Heuristics for determining the optimal number of clusters pointed to a three-cluster solution for grouping subtypes of OCD. The first had themes relating to relationship and just-right; the second had themes relating to doubt and checking; and the third had themes relating to contamination, somatic, physical harm, and sexual harm. All three clusters showed close semantic relationships with each other in the central area of convergence, with themes relating to harm. An equal-sized split-sample analysis across individuals and a split-sample analysis over time both showed overall stable cluster solutions. Words in the third cluster were the most frequently occurring words, followed by words in the first cluster.

CONCLUSIONS

The clustering of naturally acquired obsessional words resulted in three major groupings of semantic themes, which partially overlapped with predefined checklists from previous studies. Furthermore, the closeness of the overall embedded relationships across clusters and their central convergence on harm suggests that, at least at the level of self-reported obsessional thoughts, most obsessions have close semantic relationships. Harm to self or others may be an underlying organizing theme across many obsessions. Notably, relationship-themed words, not previously included in factor-analytic studies, clustered with just-right words. These novel insights have potential implications for understanding how an apparent multitude of obsessional symptoms are connected by underlying themes. This observation could aid exposure-based treatment approaches and could be used as a conceptual framework for future research.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af57/8277342/c7e6da720a0a/jmir_v23i6e25482_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af57/8277342/7e4f6623ce24/jmir_v23i6e25482_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af57/8277342/7b4ac167aab5/jmir_v23i6e25482_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af57/8277342/c7e6da720a0a/jmir_v23i6e25482_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af57/8277342/7e4f6623ce24/jmir_v23i6e25482_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af57/8277342/7b4ac167aab5/jmir_v23i6e25482_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af57/8277342/c7e6da720a0a/jmir_v23i6e25482_fig3.jpg
摘要

背景

强迫症(OCD)的特征是反复出现的侵入性思维、冲动或图像(强迫观念)和重复的身体或精神行为(强迫行为)。先前的因素分析和聚类研究表明,存在强迫症症状的三个或四个亚型。然而,这些研究依赖于预先定义的症状检查表,这些检查表在广度上有限,并且可能偏向于研究人员以前对 OCD 的概念化。

目的

在这项研究中,我们从 OCD 移动应用程序中获得的大量自由报告的强迫症状数据集中检查,以发现潜在的 OCD 亚型。在此基础上,我们使用词嵌入技术,根据英语中潜在的语义关系,对强迫观念进行基于数据的聚类。

方法

我们从一个移动应用程序,即 NOCD 的大量用户中提取描述强迫观念的自由文本条目。使用全局词向量表示算法应用语义向量空间建模。还应用了特定领域的扩展 Mittens,用 OCD 特定的词来增强语料库。由此产生的表示提供了在 100 维空间中词向量的线性子结构。我们对最常用词的 100 维向量表示应用主成分分析,然后应用 k-均值聚类获得相关词的聚类。

结果

我们从 25369 个人中获得了 7001 个独特的代表强迫观念的单词。确定最佳聚类数目的启发式方法指出,将 OCD 亚型分组为三个聚类是最佳选择。第一个聚类的主题与人际关系和恰到好处有关;第二个聚类的主题与怀疑和检查有关;第三个聚类的主题与污染、躯体、身体伤害和性伤害有关。所有三个聚类在收敛的中心区域都具有密切的语义关系,主题与伤害有关。在个体之间进行等分样本分析和随时间进行等分样本分析都显示出总体稳定的聚类解决方案。第三聚类中的单词是最常出现的单词,其次是第一聚类中的单词。

结论

自然获得的强迫性词语聚类产生了三个主要的语义主题分组,这与以前研究中预定义的检查表部分重叠。此外,聚类之间的整体嵌入关系的紧密程度及其在伤害方面的集中收敛表明,至少在自我报告的强迫性思维层面上,大多数强迫观念具有密切的语义关系。对自己或他人的伤害可能是许多强迫观念的一个潜在组织主题。值得注意的是,以前没有纳入因素分析研究的人际关系主题词与恰到好处的词聚类在一起。这些新的见解可能对理解看似多种多样的强迫症状如何通过潜在主题联系起来具有潜在意义。这种观察结果可以帮助基于暴露的治疗方法,并可用作未来研究的概念框架。

相似文献

1
Semantic Linkages of Obsessions From an International Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Mobile App Data Set: Big Data Analytics Study.从国际强迫症移动应用程序数据集看强迫观念的语义联系:大数据分析研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 21;23(6):e25482. doi: 10.2196/25482.
2
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder强迫症
3
[Current and emerging features of obsessive-compulsive disorder--trends for the revision of DSM-5].[强迫症的当前及新出现特征——《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版修订趋势]
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2012;114(9):1023-30.
4
A comparison of cluster and factor analytic techniques for identifying symptom-based dimensions of obsessive-compulsive disorder.比较聚类和因子分析技术在识别强迫症基于症状维度中的应用。
Psychiatry Res. 2019 Aug;278:86-96. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.05.040. Epub 2019 May 25.
5
Clinical subtypes of obsessive-compulsive disorder based on the presence of checking and washing compulsions.基于检查和洗涤强迫行为的强迫症临床亚型。
Braz J Psychiatry. 2005 Sep;27(3):201-7. doi: 10.1590/s1516-44462005000300008. Epub 2005 Oct 4.
6
[Modern typology of symptoms and obsessive-compulsive syndromes: results of a large French study of 615 patients].[症状与强迫综合征的现代类型学:一项针对615名患者的大型法国研究结果]
Encephale. 1996 May;22 Spec No 1:9-21.
7
[Washing, checking, and rumination: are the belief domains, obsessions and compulsions specific to OCD subtypes?].[洗涤、检查与沉思:信念领域、强迫观念及强迫行为是否为强迫症亚型所特有?]
Encephale. 2010 Feb;36(1):54-61. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.09.003. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
8
Obsessive-compulsive disorder symptom dimensions show specific relationships to psychiatric comorbidity.强迫症症状维度与精神疾病共病呈现特定关系。
Psychiatry Res. 2005 Jun 15;135(2):121-32. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2005.03.003.
9
What Drives OCD Symptom Change During CBT Treatment? Temporal Relationships Among Obsessions and Compulsions.强迫症症状在认知行为治疗中变化的原因是什么?强迫观念和强迫行为之间的时间关系。
Behav Ther. 2019 Jan;50(1):87-100. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2018.03.012. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
10
Revision of the Padua Inventory of obsessive compulsive disorder symptoms: distinctions between worry, obsessions, and compulsions.《帕多瓦强迫症症状量表的修订:担忧、强迫观念与强迫行为之间的区别》
Behav Res Ther. 1996 Feb;34(2):163-73. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(95)00035-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Deep learning in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a narrative review.强迫症中的深度学习:一项叙述性综述。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 13;16:1581297. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1581297. eCollection 2025.
2
Artificial Intelligence in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Systematic Review.强迫症中的人工智能:一项系统综述。
Curr Treat Options Psychiatry. 2025;12(1):23. doi: 10.1007/s40501-025-00359-8. Epub 2025 Jun 14.
3
Natural language processing in clinical neuroscience and psychiatry: A review.临床神经科学与精神病学中的自然语言处理:综述

本文引用的文献

1
Reaching reliable change using short, daily, cognitive training exercises delivered on a mobile application: The case of Relationship Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (ROCD) symptoms and cognitions in a subclinical cohort.使用移动应用程序提供的简短、日常、认知训练练习实现可靠改变:在亚临床队列中,关系强迫症(ROCD)症状和认知的案例。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Nov 1;276:775-787. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.043. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
2
Best practices for analyzing large-scale health data from wearables and smartphone apps.分析来自可穿戴设备和智能手机应用程序的大规模健康数据的最佳实践。
NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Jun 3;2:45. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0121-1. eCollection 2019.
3
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 14;13:946387. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.946387. eCollection 2022.
4
Online Video Teletherapy Treatment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Using Exposure and Response Prevention: Clinical Outcomes From a Retrospective Longitudinal Observational Study.在线视频远程治疗强迫症使用暴露和反应预防:一项回顾性纵向观察研究的临床结果。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 19;24(5):e36431. doi: 10.2196/36431.
Relationship Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Interference, Symptoms, and Maladaptive Beliefs.
关系强迫障碍:干扰、症状及适应不良信念
Front Psychiatry. 2016 Apr 18;7:58. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00058. eCollection 2016.
4
Half of obsessive-compulsive disorder cases misdiagnosed: vignette-based survey of primary care physicians.半数强迫症病例被误诊:基于病例的初级保健医生调查。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2015 Jun;76(6):e761-7. doi: 10.4088/JCP.14m09110.
5
Right or flawed: relationship obsessions and sexual satisfaction.正确还是有缺陷:关系痴迷与性满足。
J Sex Med. 2014 Sep;11(9):2218-24. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12616. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
6
High rates of OCD symptom misidentification by mental health professionals.心理健康专业人员对强迫症症状的误判率很高。
Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;25(3):201-9.
7
A cluster separation measure.一种聚类分离度量。
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1979 Feb;1(2):224-7.
8
Problems of Obsessional Illness: (Section of Psychiatry).强迫性障碍问题:(精神病学部分)
Proc R Soc Med. 1936 Feb;29(4):325-36. doi: 10.1177/003591573602900418.
9
Concurrent validity of the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale-Symptom Checklist.耶鲁-布朗强迫量表症状清单的同时效度
J Clin Psychol. 2008 Dec;64(12):1338-51. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20525.
10
Meta-analysis of the symptom structure of obsessive-compulsive disorder.强迫症症状结构的荟萃分析。
Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;165(12):1532-42. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08020320. Epub 2008 Oct 15.