• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Clinical Utility of Functional RNA Analysis for the Reclassification of Splicing Gene Variants in Hereditary Cancer.功能性 RNA 分析在遗传性癌症剪接基因变异再分类中的临床应用
Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2021 May-Jun;18(3):285-294. doi: 10.21873/cgp.20259.
2
Identification of Spliceogenic Variants beyond Canonical GT-AG Splice Sites in Hereditary Cancer Genes.鉴定遗传性癌症基因中非典型 GT-AG 剪接位点的剪接变体。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jul 4;23(13):7446. doi: 10.3390/ijms23137446.
3
Diagnostic Outcomes of Concurrent DNA and RNA Sequencing in Individuals Undergoing Hereditary Cancer Testing.个体接受遗传性癌症检测时同时进行 DNA 和 RNA 测序的诊断结果。
JAMA Oncol. 2024 Feb 1;10(2):212-219. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.5586.
4
Spectrum of splicing variants in disease genes and the ability of RNA analysis to reduce uncertainty in clinical interpretation.疾病基因中剪接变异的谱与 RNA 分析减少临床解读不确定性的能力。
Am J Hum Genet. 2021 Apr 1;108(4):696-708. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.03.006. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
5
Assessment of Diagnostic Outcomes of RNA Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer.遗传性癌症 RNA 基因检测的诊断结果评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1913900. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.13900.
6
Characterization of the c.793-1G > A splicing variant in CHEK2 gene as pathogenic: a case report.CHEK2 基因 c.793-1G > A 剪接变异的致病性特征:一例报告。
BMC Med Genet. 2019 Jul 26;20(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12881-019-0862-3.
7
Identification of genetic variants for clinical management of familial colorectal tumors.鉴定用于家族性结直肠肿瘤临床管理的遗传变异。
BMC Med Genet. 2018 Feb 20;19(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12881-018-0533-9.
8
Results of multigene panel testing in familial cancer cases without genetic cause demonstrated by single gene testing.对经单基因检测未发现遗传病因的家族性癌症病例进行多基因检测panel 的结果。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 6;9(1):18555. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54517-z.
9
Parallel DNA/RNA NGS Using an Identical Target Enrichment Panel in the Analysis of Hereditary Cancer Predisposition.采用相同的靶向富集panel 对遗传性癌症易感性进行平行 DNA/RNA NGS 分析。
Folia Biol (Praha). 2024;70(1):62-73. doi: 10.14712/fb2024070010062.
10
Potentially pathogenic germline CHEK2 c.319+2T>A among multiple early-onset cancer families.多个早发性癌症家族中潜在致病性的种系CHEK2基因c.319+2T>A突变
Fam Cancer. 2018 Jan;17(1):141-153. doi: 10.1007/s10689-017-0011-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Refining the interpretation of variants of uncertain significance in hereditary cancer screening through integrated RNA sequencing.通过整合RNA测序优化遗传性癌症筛查中意义未明变异的解读
Genet Med Open. 2024 Dec 10;3:101914. doi: 10.1016/j.gimo.2024.101914. eCollection 2025.
2
Diagnostic Outcomes of Concurrent DNA and RNA Sequencing in Individuals Undergoing Hereditary Cancer Testing.个体接受遗传性癌症检测时同时进行 DNA 和 RNA 测序的诊断结果。
JAMA Oncol. 2024 Feb 1;10(2):212-219. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.5586.
3
Copy Number Variations (CNVs) Account for 10.8% of Pathogenic Variants in Patients Referred for Hereditary Cancer Testing.拷贝数变异 (CNVs) 占遗传性癌症检测患者致病性变异的 10.8%。
Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2023 Sep-Oct;20(5):448-455. doi: 10.21873/cgp.20396.
4
Population screening shows risk of inherited cancer and familial hypercholesterolemia in Oregon.俄勒冈州的人群筛查显示遗传性癌症和家族性高胆固醇血症的风险。
Am J Hum Genet. 2023 Aug 3;110(8):1249-1265. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.06.014. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
5
Mutational and splicing landscape in a cohort of 43,000 patients tested for hereditary cancer.对43000名遗传性癌症检测患者队列的突变和剪接图谱分析。
NPJ Genom Med. 2022 Aug 25;7(1):49. doi: 10.1038/s41525-022-00323-y.
6
Transcriptome analysis provides critical answers to the "variants of uncertain significance" conundrum.转录组分析为“意义不明的变异”难题提供了关键答案。
Hum Mutat. 2022 Nov;43(11):1590-1608. doi: 10.1002/humu.24394. Epub 2022 May 18.
7
RNA Analysis and Clinical Characterization of a Novel Splice Variant in the Gene Causing Familial Sotos Syndrome.导致家族性索托斯综合征的基因中一种新型剪接变体的RNA分析及临床特征
Front Pediatr. 2022 Feb 2;10:827802. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.827802. eCollection 2022.
8
What's Wrong in a Jump? Prediction and Validation of Splice Site Variants.跳跃中出了什么问题?剪接位点变异的预测与验证
Methods Protoc. 2021 Sep 5;4(3):62. doi: 10.3390/mps4030062.

本文引用的文献

1
Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.遗传/家族性高风险评估:乳腺癌、卵巢癌和胰腺癌,第 2.2021 版,NCCN 肿瘤学临床实践指南。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Jan 6;19(1):77-102. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0001.
2
Impact of a Cancer Gene Variant Reclassification Program Over a 20-Year Period.癌症基因变异重新分类计划在20年期间的影响。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2020 Aug 27;4. doi: 10.1200/PO.20.00020. eCollection 2020.
3
Exon splicing analysis of intronic variants in multigene cancer panel testing for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer.多基因癌症panel 检测中内含子变异的外显子剪接分析,用于遗传性乳腺癌/卵巢癌。
Cancer Sci. 2020 Oct;111(10):3912-3925. doi: 10.1111/cas.14600. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
4
Variants of uncertain significance in the era of high-throughput genome sequencing: a lesson from breast and ovary cancers.高通量基因组测序时代意义未明的变异:乳腺癌和卵巢癌的教训。
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Mar 4;39(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13046-020-01554-6.
5
Blood RNA analysis can increase clinical diagnostic rate and resolve variants of uncertain significance.血液 RNA 分析可以提高临床诊断率,并解决意义不确定的变异。
Genet Med. 2020 Jun;22(6):1005-1014. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0766-9. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
6
Breast cancer screening implications of risk modeling among female relatives of ATM and CHEK2 carriers.携带 ATM 和 CHEK2 突变的女性亲属的风险建模对乳腺癌筛查的影响。
Cancer. 2020 Apr 15;126(8):1651-1655. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32715. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
7
ATM Dysfunction in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma and Associated Therapeutic Implications.胰腺腺癌中的 ATM 功能障碍及其相关治疗意义。
Mol Cancer Ther. 2019 Nov;18(11):1899-1908. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0208.
8
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Colorectal, Version 2.2019.NCCN 指南解读:遗传/家族性高风险评估:结直肠癌,第 2.2019 版。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Sep 1;17(9):1032-1041. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0044.
9
A clinical guide to hereditary cancer panel testing: evaluation of gene-specific cancer associations and sensitivity of genetic testing criteria in a cohort of 165,000 high-risk patients.遗传性癌症基因检测临床指南:对 165000 例高危患者中基因特异性癌症相关性和基因检测标准敏感性的队列评估。
Genet Med. 2020 Feb;22(2):407-415. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0633-8. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
10
Genetic and genomic basis of the mismatch repair system involved in Lynch syndrome.错配修复系统相关基因及基因组在林奇综合征中的作用。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2019 Sep;24(9):999-1011. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01494-y. Epub 2019 Jul 4.

功能性 RNA 分析在遗传性癌症剪接基因变异再分类中的临床应用

Clinical Utility of Functional RNA Analysis for the Reclassification of Splicing Gene Variants in Hereditary Cancer.

机构信息

Genekor Medical S.A, Athens, Greece;

Genekor Medical S.A, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2021 May-Jun;18(3):285-294. doi: 10.21873/cgp.20259.

DOI:10.21873/cgp.20259
PMID:33893081
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8126331/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Classification of splicing variants (SVs) in genes associated with hereditary cancer is often challenging. The aim of this study was to investigate the occurrence of SVs in hereditary cancer genes and the clinical utility of RNA analysis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

1518 individuals were tested for cancer predisposition, using a Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) panel of 36 genes. Splicing variant analysis was performed using RT-PCR and Sanger Sequencing.

RESULTS

In total, 34 different SVs were identified, 53% of which were classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic. The remaining 16 variants were initially classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS). RNA analysis was performed for 3 novel variants.

CONCLUSION

The RNA analysis assisted in the reclassification of 20% of splicing variants from VUS to pathogenic. RNA analysis is essential in the case of uncharacterized splicing variants, for proper classification and personalized management of these patients.

摘要

背景

与遗传性癌症相关基因的剪接变异(SV)分类通常具有挑战性。本研究旨在调查遗传性癌症基因中 SV 的发生情况以及 RNA 分析的临床效用。

材料和方法

使用针对 36 个基因的下一代测序 (NGS) 面板,对 1518 个人进行癌症易感性检测。使用 RT-PCR 和 Sanger 测序进行剪接变异分析。

结果

总共鉴定出 34 种不同的 SV,其中 53%被归类为致病性或可能致病性。其余 16 个变体最初被归类为意义不确定的变异 (VUS)。对 3 个新变体进行了 RNA 分析。

结论

RNA 分析有助于将 20%的剪接变异从 VUS 重新分类为致病性。在未表征的剪接变异的情况下,RNA 分析对于正确分类和对这些患者进行个性化管理至关重要。