The MDAR (Materials Design Analysis Reporting) Framework for transparent reporting in the life sciences.
作者信息
Macleod Malcolm, Collings Andrew M, Graf Chris, Kiermer Veronique, Mellor David, Swaminathan Sowmya, Sweet Deborah, Vinson Valda
机构信息
Edinburgh CAMARADES group, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, United Kingdom;
eLife Sciences Publications Ltd., Cambridge CB4 1YG, United Kingdom.
出版信息
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 27;118(17). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2103238118.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The MDAR (Materials Design Analysis Reporting) Framework for transparent reporting in the life sciences.用于生命科学透明报告的MDAR（材料设计分析报告）框架。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 27;118(17). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2103238118.
2
Science, misinformation and digital technology during the Covid-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间的科学、错误信息和数字技术。
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2021 May 11;43(2):68. doi: 10.1007/s40656-021-00424-4.
3
Announcement: Towards greater reproducibility for life-sciences research in Nature.公告：迈向《自然》杂志生命科学研究更高的可重复性
Nature. 2017 May 31;546(7656):8. doi: 10.1038/546008a.
4
Credibility and reproducibility.可信度与可重复性。
Structure. 2015 Jan 6;23(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2014.12.001.
5
Reproducibility: In praise of open research measures.可重复性：赞开放式研究方法
Nature. 2013 Jun 13;498(7453):170. doi: 10.1038/498170b.
6
Making Research Evaluation More Transparent: Aligning Research Philosophy, Institutional Values, and Reporting.使研究评估更加透明：使研究理念、机构价值观和报告保持一致。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 May;14(3):361-375. doi: 10.1177/1745691618810693. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
7
The Mediterranean Institute for Life Sciences--an attempt at scientific excellence in Croatia.地中海生命科学研究所——克罗地亚追求科学卓越的一次尝试。
IUBMB Life. 2008 May;60(5):262-4. doi: 10.1002/iub.59.
8
Sharing publication-related data and materials: responsibilities of authorship in the life sciences.分享与出版物相关的数据和材料：生命科学领域作者的责任
Plant Physiol. 2003 May;132(1):19-24. doi: 10.1104/pp.900068.
9
Celebrating 90 years of Peking University School of Life Sciences (1925-2015).庆祝北京大学生命科学学院成立90周年（1925 - 2015）
Sci China Life Sci. 2015 Nov;58(11):1055-6. doi: 10.1007/s11427-015-4963-8.
10
Standards for reporting bioscience data: a forward look.生物科学数据报告标准：前瞻性展望。
Drug Discov Today. 2007 Jul;12(13-14):527-33. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2007.05.006. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
引用本文的文献
1
Do organisms need an impact factor? Citations of key biological resources including model organisms reveal usage patterns and impact.生物体需要影响因子吗？包括模式生物在内的关键生物资源的引用揭示了使用模式和影响。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 13;20(8):e0327344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327344. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessing the Effectiveness of SciScore in Supporting the Reproducibility of Scientific Research.评估SciScore在支持科研可重复性方面的有效性。
Sci Ed. 2023 Jun;46(2):46-52. doi: 10.36591/se-d-4602-15. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
3
VueGen: automating the generation of scientific reports.VueGen：科学报告生成自动化
Bioinform Adv. 2025 Jun 24;5(1):vbaf149. doi: 10.1093/bioadv/vbaf149. eCollection 2025.
4
Building a synthesis-ready research ecosystem: fostering collaboration and open science to accelerate biomedical translation.构建一个可供综合研究的生态系统：促进合作与开放科学以加速生物医学转化。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Mar 10;25(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02524-2.
5
Quorum sensing LuxR proteins VjbR and BabR jointly regulate survival during infection.群体感应LuxR蛋白VjbR和BabR共同调节感染期间的生存。
J Bacteriol. 2025 Mar 20;207(3):e0052724. doi: 10.1128/jb.00527-24. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
6
Promoting reusable and open methods and protocols (PRO-MaP) can improve methodological reporting in the life sciences.推广可重复使用和开放的方法和协议（PRO-MaP）可以提高生命科学领域的方法报告质量。
PLoS Biol. 2024 Sep 19;22(9):e3002835. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002835. eCollection 2024 Sep.
7
REFORMS: Consensus-based Recommendations for Machine-learning-based Science.改革：基于共识的机器学习科学建议。
Sci Adv. 2024 May 3;10(18):eadk3452. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adk3452. Epub 2024 May 1.
8
Endometrial Cancer Detection by DNA Methylation Analysis in Cervical Papanicolaou Brush Samples.基于宫颈巴氏刷样本中 DNA 甲基化分析的子宫内膜癌检测。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Jan-Dec;23:15330338241242637. doi: 10.1177/15330338241242637.
9
Experimental credit.实验学分。
EMBO Rep. 2024 Mar;25(3):927-929. doi: 10.1038/s44319-024-00105-w. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
10
Do organisms need an impact factor? Citations of key biological resources including model organisms reveal usage patterns and impact.生物体需要影响因子吗？包括模式生物在内的关键生物资源的引用揭示了使用模式和影响。
bioRxiv. 2024 Jan 16:2024.01.15.575636. doi: 10.1101/2024.01.15.575636.
本文引用的文献
1
Did a change in Nature journals' editorial policy for life sciences research improve reporting?《自然》杂志生命科学研究编辑政策的改变是否改善了报告情况？
BMJ Open Sci. 2019 Feb 26;3(1):e000035. doi: 10.1136/bmjos-2017-000035. eCollection 2019.
2
The Rigor and Transparency Index Quality Metric for Assessing Biological and Medical Science Methods.用于评估生物医学科学方法的严谨性与透明度指数质量指标
iScience. 2020 Oct 20;23(11):101698. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101698. eCollection 2020 Nov 20.
3
A randomised controlled trial of an Intervention to Improve Compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines (IICARus).一项旨在提高对《动物研究：体内实验报告指南》（ARRIVE）依从性的干预措施的随机对照试验（IICARus）。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019 Jun 12;4:12. doi: 10.1186/s41073-019-0069-3. eCollection 2019.
4
Checklists work to improve science.清单有助于改进科学。
Nature. 2018 Apr;556(7701):273-274. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-04590-7.
5
A checklist is associated with increased quality of reporting preclinical biomedical research: A systematic review.一份检查表与提高临床前生物医学研究报告质量相关：一项系统评价。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 13;12(9):e0183591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183591. eCollection 2017.
6
A STAR Is Born.一个明星的诞生。
Cell. 2016 Aug 25;166(5):1059-1060. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.021.
7
Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature.生物医学文献中的可重复研究实践与透明度
PLoS Biol. 2016 Jan 4;14(1):e1002333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002333. eCollection 2016 Jan.
8
Risk of Bias in Reports of In Vivo Research: A Focus for Improvement.体内研究报告中的偏倚风险：改进重点
PLoS Biol. 2015 Oct 13;13(10):e1002273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002273. eCollection 2015 Oct.
9
SCIENTIFIC STANDARDS. Promoting an open research culture.科学标准。促进开放的研究文化。
Science. 2015 Jun 26;348(6242):1422-5. doi: 10.1126/science.aab2374.
10
UK funders demand strong statistics for animal studies.英国资助者要求动物研究要有强有力的统计数据。
Nature. 2015 Apr 16;520(7547):271-2. doi: 10.1038/520271a.
Zotero 插件