地塞米松或托珠单抗治疗的埃及危重症 COVID-19 患者辅助通气的短期存活率。

Short term survival of critically ill COVID-19 Egyptian patients on assisted ventilation treated by either Dexamethasone or Tocilizumab.

机构信息

Department of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis, Qena Faculty of Medicine, South Vally University, Qena, Egypt.

Esna Quarantine Hospital, Esna, Luxor, Egypt.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 23;11(1):8816. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88086-x.

Abstract

Tocilizumab (TCZ) and Dexamethasone are used for the treatment of critically ill COVID-19 patients. We compared the short-term survival of critically ill COVID-19 patients treated with either TCZ or Dexamethasone. 109 critically ill COVID-19 patients randomly assigned to either TCZ therapy (46 patients) or pulse Dexamethasone therapy (63 patients). Age, sex, neutrophil/ lymphocyte ratio, D-dimer, ferritin level, and CT chest pattern were comparable between groups. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed better survival in Dexamethasone group compared with TCZ (P = 0.002), patients didn't need vasopressor at admission (P < 0.0001), patients on non-invasive ventilation compared to patients on mechanical ventilation (P<0.0001 ), and in patients with ground glass pattern in CT chest (P<0.0001 ) compared with those who have consolidation. Cox regression analysis showed that, TCZ therapy (HR = 2.162, 95% CI, 1.144-4.087, P <0.0001) compared with Dexamethasone group, higher neutrophil/Lymphocyte ratio (HR = 2.40, CI, 1.351-4.185, P = 0.003), lower PaO/FiO, 2 days after treatment, (HR = 1.147, 95% CI, 1.002-1.624, P < 0.0001) independently predicted higher probability of mortality. Dexamethasone showed better survival in severe COVID-19 compared to TCZ. Considering the risk factors mentioned here is crucial when dealing with severe COVID-19 cases.Clinical trial registration No clinicalTrials.gov: Nal protocol approved by Hospital Authorities, for data collection and for participation in CT04519385 (19/08/2020).

摘要

托珠单抗(TCZ)和地塞米松用于治疗重症 COVID-19 患者。我们比较了使用 TCZ 或地塞米松治疗的重症 COVID-19 患者的短期生存率。109 例重症 COVID-19 患者随机分为 TCZ 治疗组(46 例)或脉冲地塞米松治疗组(63 例)。两组间年龄、性别、中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值、D-二聚体、铁蛋白水平和 CT 胸部模式无差异。Kaplan-Meier 生存分析显示地塞米松组的生存率优于 TCZ 组(P=0.002),入院时不需要血管加压药(P<0.0001),与机械通气患者相比,接受无创通气的患者(P<0.0001),以及 CT 胸部有磨玻璃样改变的患者(P<0.0001),与实变患者相比。Cox 回归分析显示,与地塞米松组相比,TCZ 治疗(HR=2.162,95%CI,1.144-4.087,P<0.0001),较高的中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(HR=2.40,CI,1.351-4.185,P=0.003),较低的 PaO/FiO,治疗后 2 天(HR=1.147,95%CI,1.002-1.624,P<0.0001),独立预测死亡率较高的概率。地塞米松在治疗严重 COVID-19 方面优于 TCZ。考虑到这里提到的危险因素在处理严重 COVID-19 病例时至关重要。临床试验注册号 Nal 方案获医院管理局批准,用于数据收集和参与 CT04519385(2020 年 8 月 19 日)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/924d/8065149/36e42b888861/41598_2021_88086_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索