Department of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis, Qena Faculty of Medicine, South Vally University, Qena, Egypt.
Esna Quarantine Hospital, Esna, Luxor, Egypt.
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 23;11(1):8816. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88086-x.
Tocilizumab (TCZ) and Dexamethasone are used for the treatment of critically ill COVID-19 patients. We compared the short-term survival of critically ill COVID-19 patients treated with either TCZ or Dexamethasone. 109 critically ill COVID-19 patients randomly assigned to either TCZ therapy (46 patients) or pulse Dexamethasone therapy (63 patients). Age, sex, neutrophil/ lymphocyte ratio, D-dimer, ferritin level, and CT chest pattern were comparable between groups. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed better survival in Dexamethasone group compared with TCZ (P = 0.002), patients didn't need vasopressor at admission (P < 0.0001), patients on non-invasive ventilation compared to patients on mechanical ventilation (P<0.0001 ), and in patients with ground glass pattern in CT chest (P<0.0001 ) compared with those who have consolidation. Cox regression analysis showed that, TCZ therapy (HR = 2.162, 95% CI, 1.144-4.087, P <0.0001) compared with Dexamethasone group, higher neutrophil/Lymphocyte ratio (HR = 2.40, CI, 1.351-4.185, P = 0.003), lower PaO/FiO, 2 days after treatment, (HR = 1.147, 95% CI, 1.002-1.624, P < 0.0001) independently predicted higher probability of mortality. Dexamethasone showed better survival in severe COVID-19 compared to TCZ. Considering the risk factors mentioned here is crucial when dealing with severe COVID-19 cases.Clinical trial registration No clinicalTrials.gov: Nal protocol approved by Hospital Authorities, for data collection and for participation in CT04519385 (19/08/2020).
托珠单抗(TCZ)和地塞米松用于治疗重症 COVID-19 患者。我们比较了使用 TCZ 或地塞米松治疗的重症 COVID-19 患者的短期生存率。109 例重症 COVID-19 患者随机分为 TCZ 治疗组(46 例)或脉冲地塞米松治疗组(63 例)。两组间年龄、性别、中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值、D-二聚体、铁蛋白水平和 CT 胸部模式无差异。Kaplan-Meier 生存分析显示地塞米松组的生存率优于 TCZ 组(P=0.002),入院时不需要血管加压药(P<0.0001),与机械通气患者相比,接受无创通气的患者(P<0.0001),以及 CT 胸部有磨玻璃样改变的患者(P<0.0001),与实变患者相比。Cox 回归分析显示,与地塞米松组相比,TCZ 治疗(HR=2.162,95%CI,1.144-4.087,P<0.0001),较高的中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(HR=2.40,CI,1.351-4.185,P=0.003),较低的 PaO/FiO,治疗后 2 天(HR=1.147,95%CI,1.002-1.624,P<0.0001),独立预测死亡率较高的概率。地塞米松在治疗严重 COVID-19 方面优于 TCZ。考虑到这里提到的危险因素在处理严重 COVID-19 病例时至关重要。临床试验注册号 Nal 方案获医院管理局批准,用于数据收集和参与 CT04519385(2020 年 8 月 19 日)。