Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Neuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Sleep. 2021 Sep 13;44(9). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsab106.
The high prevalence of chronic sleep restriction in adolescents underscores the importance of understanding how adolescent sleep is regulated under such conditions. One component of sleep regulation is a homeostatic process: if sleep is restricted, then sleep intensity increases. Our knowledge of this process is primarily informed by total sleep deprivation studies and has been incorporated in mathematical models of human sleep regulation. Several animal studies, however, suggest that adaptation occurs in chronic sleep restriction conditions, showing an attenuated or even decreased homeostatic response. We investigated the homeostatic response of adolescents to different sleep opportunities. Thirty-four participants were allocated to one of three groups with 5, 7.5, or 10 h of sleep opportunity per night for five nights. Each group underwent a protocol of nine nights designed to mimic a school week between two weekends: two baseline nights (10 h sleep opportunity), five condition nights (5, 7.5, or 10 h), and two recovery nights (10 h). Measures of sleep homeostasis (slow-wave activity and slow-wave energy) were calculated from frontal and central EEG derivations and compared to predictions derived from simulations of the homeostatic process of the two-process model of sleep regulation. Only minor differences were found between empirical data and model predictions, indicating that sleep homeostasis is preserved under chronic sleep restriction in adolescents. These findings improve our understanding of effects of repetitive short sleep in adolescents.
青少年慢性睡眠限制的高发率强调了了解青少年在这种情况下如何调节睡眠的重要性。睡眠调节的一个组成部分是一个内稳态过程:如果睡眠受到限制,那么睡眠强度会增加。我们对这一过程的了解主要来自于完全睡眠剥夺研究,并已被纳入人类睡眠调节的数学模型中。然而,一些动物研究表明,在慢性睡眠限制的情况下会发生适应,表现出内稳态反应减弱甚至降低。我们研究了青少年对不同睡眠机会的内稳态反应。34 名参与者被分配到三个组中的一个,每个组有 5、7.5 或 10 个小时的睡眠机会,持续五晚。每个组都进行了为期九天的方案,以模拟两个周末之间的一周学校生活:两个基线晚上(10 小时睡眠机会),五个条件晚上(5、7.5 或 10 小时),两个恢复晚上(10 小时)。从额部和中央 EEG 推导中计算了睡眠内稳态(慢波活动和慢波能量)的测量值,并与睡眠调节的两过程模型的内稳态过程模拟得出的预测值进行了比较。实际数据与模型预测之间仅存在微小差异,表明青少年慢性睡眠限制下的睡眠内稳态得到了维持。这些发现提高了我们对青少年反复性短睡眠影响的认识。