Suppr超能文献

2020年3月至5月,盐湖县卫生局对无家可归者中新冠病毒病的接触者追踪情况进行评估。

Assessment of contact tracing for COVID-19 among people experiencing homelessness, Salt Lake County Health Department, March-May 2020.

作者信息

Fields Victoria L, Kiphibane Tair, Eason Jeffrey T, Hafoka Siosaia F, Lopez Adriana S, Schwartz Amy, Henry Ankita, Tran Cuc H, Tate Jacqueline E, Kirking Hannah L, Laws Rebecca L, Venkatappa Thara, Mosites Emily, Montgomery Martha P

机构信息

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.

Salt Lake County Health Department, Salt Lake City, UT.

出版信息

Ann Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;59:50-55. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 Apr 22.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Contact tracing is intended to reduce the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but it is difficult to conduct among people who live in congregate settings, including people experiencing homelessness (PEH). This analysis compares person-based contact tracing among two populations in Salt Lake County, Utah, from March-May 2020.

METHODS

All laboratory-confirmed positive cases among PEH (n = 169) and documented in Utah's surveillance system were included in this analysis. The general population comparison group (n = 163) were systematically selected from all laboratory-confirmed cases identified during the same period.

RESULTS

Ninety-three PEH cases (55%) were interviewed compared to 163 (100%) cases among the general population (P < .0001). PEH were more likely to be lost to follow-up at end of isolation (14.2%) versus the general population (0%; P-value < .0001) and provided fewer contacts per case (0.3) than the general population (4.7) (P-value < .0001). Contacts of PEH were more often unreachable (13.0% vs. 7.1%; P-value < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that contact tracing among PEH should include a location-based approach, along with a person-based approach when resources allow, due to challenges in identifying, locating, and reaching cases among PEH and their contacts through person-based contact tracing efforts alone.

摘要

目的

接触者追踪旨在减少2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的传播,但在居住在集体环境中的人群中进行追踪很困难,这些人群包括无家可归者(PEH)。本分析比较了2020年3月至5月犹他州盐湖县两个人群中基于个体的接触者追踪情况。

方法

本分析纳入了犹他州监测系统记录的所有实验室确诊的PEH阳性病例(n = 169)。一般人群对照组(n = 163)是从同一时期确定的所有实验室确诊病例中系统选取的。

结果

93例PEH病例(55%)接受了访谈,而一般人群中有163例(100%)接受了访谈(P < .0001)。与一般人群(0%)相比,PEH在隔离结束时更有可能失访(14.2%)(P值 < .0001),且每例提供的接触者数量(0.3)少于一般人群(4.7)(P值 < .0001)。PEH的接触者更常无法联系到(13.0%对7.1%;P值 < .0001)。

结论

这些发现表明,由于仅通过基于个体的接触者追踪工作来识别、定位和联系PEH及其接触者存在挑战,因此对PEH的接触者追踪应包括基于地点的方法,在资源允许时还应结合基于个体的方法。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Contact tracing strategies for infectious diseases: A systematic literature review.传染病接触者追踪策略:一项系统文献综述。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 May 9;5(5):e0004579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004579. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验