• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知行为干预减少驾驶愤怒:基于混合方法的评估。

A cognitive-behavioural intervention to reduce driving anger: Evaluation based on a mixed-method approach.

机构信息

Technical University of Denmark, Department of Technology, Management and Economics, DK-2800 Kgs., Lyngby, Denmark.

Technical University of Denmark, Department of Technology, Management and Economics, DK-2800 Kgs., Lyngby, Denmark.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jun;156:106144. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106144. Epub 2021 Apr 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2021.106144
PMID:33894475
Abstract

Road anger is an increasing problem that does not only lead to discomfort but is also associated with aggressive driving and an increased risk of crash involvement. Based on a cognitive-behavioural approach, we developed and tested a short group intervention (90 min) that aimed at decreasing road anger among drivers. We used a before-after control group design, surveying people who did (EG) and who did not (CG) participate in the group intervention. The sample (n = 126) consisted of 80 men and 46 women with a mean age of 54 years (SD = 13). In addition, a sub-sample (n = 37) participated in a driving simulator study before and after the intervention. To enrich the survey- and simulator-based findings, we conducted a focus group discussion about post-intervention experiences in traffic. Comparisons of pre and post survey results showed that constructive expression as measured by a slightly revised sub-scale of the Driving Anger Expression Inventory (DAX-short), increased significantly for EG participants but not within the CG. In addition, the involvement in milder forms of road anger (e.g., yelling) decreased significantly in the EG but not in the CG. In the simulator study, we observed that EG participants decreased the extent of aggressive driving, commenting and gesturing - however, none of these differences were statistically significant. EG participants self-assessed the intervention overall positive and 44 % reported that they had changed their way of thinking or reacting in traffic. Overall, results indicate a positive effect of the cognitive-behavioural group intervention. Study limitations, possibilities to improve the intervention and different areas of application are discussed.

摘要

路怒症是一个日益严重的问题,不仅会让人感到不适,还与攻击性驾驶行为以及事故风险增加有关。基于认知行为方法,我们开发并测试了一个简短的小组干预措施(90 分钟),旨在减少驾驶员的路怒情绪。我们采用了前后对照的对照组设计,对参加和未参加小组干预的人进行了调查。样本(n=126)由 80 名男性和 46 名女性组成,平均年龄为 54 岁(SD=13)。此外,一个子样本(n=37)在干预前后参加了驾驶模拟器研究。为了丰富调查和基于模拟器的发现,我们就交通干预后的体验进行了焦点小组讨论。与调查结果相比,经轻微修订的驾驶愤怒表达量表(DAX-短)的建设性表达测量结果显示,实验组的参与者显著增加,但对照组则没有。此外,实验组中轻度路怒(如大喊大叫)的参与度显著降低,但对照组则没有。在模拟器研究中,我们观察到实验组参与者减少了攻击性驾驶、评注和手势的程度——然而,这些差异都没有统计学意义。实验组参与者总体上对干预措施的评价是积极的,44%的人报告说他们已经改变了在交通中的思维或反应方式。总的来说,结果表明认知行为小组干预具有积极的效果。研究局限性、改进干预措施的可能性和不同的应用领域都进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
A cognitive-behavioural intervention to reduce driving anger: Evaluation based on a mixed-method approach.认知行为干预减少驾驶愤怒:基于混合方法的评估。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jun;156:106144. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106144. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
2
Brazilian adaptation of the driving anger expression inventory: testing its psychometrics properties and links between anger behavior, risky behavior, sensation seeking, and hostility in a sample of Brazilian undergraduate students.巴西驾驶愤怒表达量表的修订:检验其在巴西大学生样本中愤怒行为、冒险行为、感觉寻求和敌意之间的心理测量学特性和关联。
J Safety Res. 2019 Sep;70:233-241. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.07.008. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
3
Multigroup invariance of measure for angry drivers (MAD) scale using a representative sample of drivers in Australia.多群组愤怒驾驶员量表(MAD)的测量不变性,使用澳大利亚代表性驾驶员样本。
J Safety Res. 2024 Sep;90:208-215. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2024.05.014. Epub 2024 Jun 2.
4
Road anger expression-Changes over time and attributed reasons.路怒症表现——随时间变化的归因原因。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Oct;119:29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.06.013. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
5
Development of a short form of the driving anger expression inventory.驾驶愤怒表达量表简版的编制
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Nov;72:169-76. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.06.021. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
6
[Anger expression on the road: validity and reliability of the driving anger expression inventory].[道路上的愤怒表达:驾驶愤怒表达量表的效度与信度]
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2007 Fall;18(3):231-43.
7
Links between observed and self-reported driving anger, observed and self-reported aggressive driving, and personality traits.观察到的驾驶愤怒与自我报告的驾驶愤怒、观察到的攻击性行为与自我报告的攻击性行为之间的联系,以及人格特质。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Jun;140:105516. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105516. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
8
Gender roles, sex and the expression of driving anger.性别角色、性别与驾驶愤怒情绪的表达。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Sep;106:23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.05.016. Epub 2017 May 25.
9
Expressing Anger Is More Dangerous than Feeling Angry when Driving.开车时表达愤怒比感到愤怒更危险。
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 3;11(6):e0156948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156948. eCollection 2016.
10
Anger, aggression, risky behavior, and crash-related outcomes in three groups of drivers.三组驾驶员的愤怒、攻击性、危险行为及与撞车相关的后果
Behav Res Ther. 2003 Mar;41(3):333-49. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(02)00014-1.

引用本文的文献

1
The Path to Driving Aggression and Crash Risk: The Role of Metacognition and Anger Rumination in Anger Expression Among Chinese Drivers.引发攻击性和撞车风险的途径:元认知和愤怒反刍在中国驾驶员愤怒表达中的作用
Aggress Behav. 2025 Jul;51(4):e70041. doi: 10.1002/ab.70041.
2
A systematic review of neural, cognitive, and clinical studies of anger and aggression.对愤怒与攻击行为的神经、认知及临床研究的系统评价。
Curr Psychol. 2022 Jun 8:1-13. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03143-6.