Technical University of Denmark, Department of Technology, Management and Economics, DK-2800 Kgs., Lyngby, Denmark.
Technical University of Denmark, Department of Technology, Management and Economics, DK-2800 Kgs., Lyngby, Denmark.
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jun;156:106144. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106144. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
Road anger is an increasing problem that does not only lead to discomfort but is also associated with aggressive driving and an increased risk of crash involvement. Based on a cognitive-behavioural approach, we developed and tested a short group intervention (90 min) that aimed at decreasing road anger among drivers. We used a before-after control group design, surveying people who did (EG) and who did not (CG) participate in the group intervention. The sample (n = 126) consisted of 80 men and 46 women with a mean age of 54 years (SD = 13). In addition, a sub-sample (n = 37) participated in a driving simulator study before and after the intervention. To enrich the survey- and simulator-based findings, we conducted a focus group discussion about post-intervention experiences in traffic. Comparisons of pre and post survey results showed that constructive expression as measured by a slightly revised sub-scale of the Driving Anger Expression Inventory (DAX-short), increased significantly for EG participants but not within the CG. In addition, the involvement in milder forms of road anger (e.g., yelling) decreased significantly in the EG but not in the CG. In the simulator study, we observed that EG participants decreased the extent of aggressive driving, commenting and gesturing - however, none of these differences were statistically significant. EG participants self-assessed the intervention overall positive and 44 % reported that they had changed their way of thinking or reacting in traffic. Overall, results indicate a positive effect of the cognitive-behavioural group intervention. Study limitations, possibilities to improve the intervention and different areas of application are discussed.
路怒症是一个日益严重的问题,不仅会让人感到不适,还与攻击性驾驶行为以及事故风险增加有关。基于认知行为方法,我们开发并测试了一个简短的小组干预措施(90 分钟),旨在减少驾驶员的路怒情绪。我们采用了前后对照的对照组设计,对参加和未参加小组干预的人进行了调查。样本(n=126)由 80 名男性和 46 名女性组成,平均年龄为 54 岁(SD=13)。此外,一个子样本(n=37)在干预前后参加了驾驶模拟器研究。为了丰富调查和基于模拟器的发现,我们就交通干预后的体验进行了焦点小组讨论。与调查结果相比,经轻微修订的驾驶愤怒表达量表(DAX-短)的建设性表达测量结果显示,实验组的参与者显著增加,但对照组则没有。此外,实验组中轻度路怒(如大喊大叫)的参与度显著降低,但对照组则没有。在模拟器研究中,我们观察到实验组参与者减少了攻击性驾驶、评注和手势的程度——然而,这些差异都没有统计学意义。实验组参与者总体上对干预措施的评价是积极的,44%的人报告说他们已经改变了在交通中的思维或反应方式。总的来说,结果表明认知行为小组干预具有积极的效果。研究局限性、改进干预措施的可能性和不同的应用领域都进行了讨论。