State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, United States.
Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Lung Cancer. 2021 Jun;156:68-71. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.04.016. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
The CALGB 30610/RTOG 0538 randomized trial was designed to test whether high-dose thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) would improve survival compared with 45 Gy twice-daily (BID) TRT in limited stage small cell lung cancer (LSCLC). Two piloted experimental TRT regimens were of interest to study, 70 Gy daily (QD) and 61.2 Gy concomitant boost (CB). Driven by concerns about adequate patient accrual, a study design was employed that eliminated one experimental TRT arm based on early interim toxicity and tolerability, with the study then continuing as a traditional 2-arm phase III study.
Patients with LSCLC were assigned to receive four cycles of cisplatin and etoposide chemotherapy with one of 3 TRT regimens starting with either the first or second cycle of chemotherapy. The interim endpoint was the cumulative highest toxicity calculated from a scoring system based on treatment-related grade 3 and higher toxicity and the ability to complete therapy in the experimental arms.
The final interim analysis was performed after 70 patients accrued to each experimental cohort, and a difference in treatment related toxicity scoring was not found (p = 0.739). Severe esophageal toxicity was comparable in both cohorts. Pulmonary toxicity was low overall, though 4 patients (5.7 %) on the 61.2 Gy arm developed grade 4 dyspnea, which was not observed in the 70 Gy arm. A protocol mandated decision was made to discontinue the 61.2 Gy arm following review of toxicity with the Data and Safety Monitoring Board.
A randomized trial design using a planned early interim toxicity analysis to discriminate between experimental treatment arms is feasible in a phase III setting. Refinement of the design could increase the likelihood of detecting clinically meaningful differences in toxicity in future studies.
CALGB 30610/RTOG 0538 随机试验旨在测试高剂量胸部放疗(TRT)是否优于局限期小细胞肺癌(LSCLC)中的 45 Gy 每日两次(BID)TRT 改善生存。两种探索性的实验性 TRT 方案很有研究意义,分别是 70 Gy 每日(QD)和 61.2 Gy 同期推量(CB)。由于对患者入组数量的担忧,采用了一种研究设计,根据早期中期毒性和耐受性,消除了一个实验性 TRT 臂,随后该研究继续作为传统的 2 臂 III 期研究进行。
LSCLC 患者接受顺铂和依托泊苷化疗 4 个周期,并在化疗的第 1 或第 2 个周期开始接受 3 种 TRT 方案之一。中期终点是根据基于治疗相关 3 级及以上毒性和完成实验臂治疗能力的评分系统计算的累积最高毒性。
在每个实验组各入组 70 例患者后进行了最终的中期分析,未发现治疗相关毒性评分存在差异(p = 0.739)。两组严重食管毒性相当。总体而言,肺部毒性较低,但 61.2 Gy 组有 4 例(5.7%)患者出现 4 级呼吸困难,70 Gy 组未观察到。在数据和安全监测委员会审查毒性后,做出了停止 61.2 Gy 组的协议规定决定。
在 III 期研究中,使用计划的中期毒性分析来区分实验治疗臂的随机试验设计是可行的。对设计进行改进可以增加未来研究中检测到有临床意义的毒性差异的可能性。