• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在伴有和不伴有糖尿病的冠心病患者中,血压变异性的随访间预测价值与心血管事件。

Predictive value of visit-to-visit blood pressure variability for cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease with and without diabetes mellitus.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.

Department of Medicine, Shenzhen Hong Kong University Hospital, Shenzhen, China.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021 Apr 24;20(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01280-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12933-021-01280-z
PMID:33894788
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8070286/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

High blood pressure is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability (BPV) has recently been shown to predict cardiovascular outcomes. We investigated the predictive value of BPV for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS

Patients with stable CAD were enrolled and monitored for new MACE. Visit-to-visit BPV was defined as the coefficient of variation (CV) of systolic and diastolic BP across clinic visits. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association of BPV with MACE. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to assess its predictive ability.

RESULTS

Among 1140 Chinese patients with stable CAD, 192 (17%) experienced a new MACE. In multivariable analyses, the risk of MACE was significantly associated with CV of systolic BP (odds ratio [OR] for highest versus lowest quartile, 3.30; 95% CI 1.97-5.54), and diastolic BP (OR for highest versus lowest quartile, 2.39; 95% CI 1.39-4.11), after adjustment for variables of the risk factor model (age, gender, T2DM, hypertension, antihypertensive agents, number of BP measurements) and mean BP. The risk factor model had an AUC of 0.70 for prediction of MACE. Adding systolic/diastolic CV into the risk factor model with mean BP significantly increased the AUC to 0.73/0.72 (P = 0.002/0.007). In subgroup analyses, higher CV of systolic BP remained significantly associated with an increased risk for MACE in patients with and without T2DM, whereas the association of CV of diastolic BP with MACE was observed only in those without T2DM.

CONCLUSIONS

Visit-to-visit variability of systolic BP and of diastolic BP was an independent predictor of new MACE and provided incremental prognostic value beyond mean BP and conventional risk factors in patients with stable CAD. The association of BPV in CAD patients without T2DM with subsequent risk for MACE was stronger than in those with T2DM.

摘要

背景

高血压是心血管疾病的主要危险因素。最近研究表明,血压变异性(BPV)可预测心血管结局。本研究旨在探讨血压变异性对合并或不合并 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)的稳定性冠心病(CAD)患者发生主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的预测价值。

方法

入选稳定性 CAD 患者,监测新发生的 MACE。血压变异性定义为诊室血压的收缩压和舒张压变异系数(CV)。采用多变量逻辑回归分析评估 BPV 与 MACE 的相关性。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评估其预测能力。

结果

1140 例中国稳定性 CAD 患者中,192 例(17%)发生新发生的 MACE。多变量分析显示,与最低四分位相比,收缩压 CV 最高四分位的 MACE 风险比(OR)为 3.30(95%CI:1.975.54),舒张压 CV 最高四分位的 MACE 风险比为 2.39(95%CI:1.394.11),校正危险因素模型(年龄、性别、T2DM、高血压、降压药、血压测量次数)和平均血压后。危险因素模型预测 MACE 的 AUC 为 0.70。在危险因素模型中加入收缩压/舒张压 CV 后,AUC 显著增加至 0.73/0.72(P=0.002/0.007)。亚组分析显示,在合并或不合并 T2DM 的患者中,较高的收缩压 CV 仍与 MACE 风险增加显著相关,而舒张压 CV 与 MACE 的相关性仅见于不合并 T2DM 的患者。

结论

收缩压和舒张压的 BPV 是稳定性 CAD 患者新发 MACE 的独立预测因素,其提供了平均血压和传统危险因素之外的额外预后价值。在不合并 T2DM 的 CAD 患者中,BPV 与随后发生 MACE 的相关性强于合并 T2DM 的患者。

相似文献

1
Predictive value of visit-to-visit blood pressure variability for cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease with and without diabetes mellitus.在伴有和不伴有糖尿病的冠心病患者中,血压变异性的随访间预测价值与心血管事件。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021 Apr 24;20(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01280-z.
2
High-sensitivity troponin I and B-type natriuretic peptide biomarkers for prediction of cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease with and without diabetes mellitus.高敏肌钙蛋白 I 和 B 型利钠肽生物标志物用于预测伴或不伴糖尿病的冠状动脉疾病患者的心血管事件。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019 Dec 17;18(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0974-2.
3
Impact of visit-to-visit variability and systolic blood pressure control on subsequent outcomes in hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease (from the HIJ-CREATE substudy).就诊间血压变异性和收缩压控制对冠心病高血压患者后续结局的影响(来自HIJ-CREATE子研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Jul 15;116(2):236-42. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.04.011. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
4
Association between visit-to-visit blood pressure variability and adverse events in coronary artery disease patients after coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后冠心病患者血压变异性与不良事件的关系。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2022 Oct;24(10):1327-1338. doi: 10.1111/jch.14565. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
5
Association between B-type natriuretic peptide and within-visit blood pressure variability.B型利钠肽与就诊期间血压变异性之间的关联。
Clin Cardiol. 2018 Jun;41(6):778-781. doi: 10.1002/clc.22953. Epub 2018 May 10.
6
Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability as a prognostic marker in patients with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases--relationships and comparisons with vascular markers of atherosclerosis.在心血管和脑血管疾病患者中,作为预后标志物的随访间血压变异性——与动脉粥样硬化血管标志物的关系和比较。
Atherosclerosis. 2014 Jul;235(1):230-5. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.04.015. Epub 2014 May 9.
7
Effect of visit-to-visit blood pressure variability on cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease and well-controlled blood pressure.就诊间血压变异性对冠心病且血压控制良好患者心血管事件的影响。
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2016 Oct;10(10):799-810. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
8
Number of blood pressure measurements needed to estimate long-term visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability for predicting cardiovascular risk: a 10-year retrospective cohort study in a primary care clinic in Malaysia.需要多少次血压测量来估计长期随访收缩压变异性以预测心血管风险:马来西亚一家初级保健诊所的 10 年回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 20;9(4):e025322. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025322.
9
Prognostic importance of visit-to-visit blood pressure variability for micro- and macrovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: The Rio de Janeiro Type 2 Diabetes Cohort Study.2 型糖尿病患者的血压变异性与微血管和大血管结局的预后意义:里约热内卢 2 型糖尿病队列研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 May 2;19(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01030-7.
10
Visit-to-Visit Blood Pressure Variability, Coronary Atheroma Progression, and Clinical Outcomes.血压变异性与冠状动脉粥样硬化进展及临床转归的关系
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 May 1;4(5):437-443. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.0751.

引用本文的文献

1
Blood Pressure Variability and Risk of Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in Real-World Clinical Settings.现实临床环境中的血压变异性与心血管事件及死亡风险
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Jun 3;14(11):e037658. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.037658. Epub 2025 May 26.
2
Impact of Empagliflozin on Cardiovascular Outcomes and Renal Function in Patients with Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.恩格列净对肥胖合并2型糖尿病患者心血管结局和肾功能的影响:一项回顾性队列研究
Diabetes Ther. 2025 May 19. doi: 10.1007/s13300-025-01753-4.
3
Systolic blood pressure variability: risk of cardiovascular events, chronic kidney disease, dementia, and death.收缩压变异性:心血管事件、慢性肾脏病、痴呆和死亡的风险。
Eur Heart J. 2025 Jul 14;46(27):2673-2687. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf256.
4
Association of systolic blood pressure target and variability with long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的收缩压目标值及变异性与长期临床结局的关联
Clin Hypertens. 2025 Apr 1;31:e13. doi: 10.5646/ch.2025.31.e13. eCollection 2025.
5
The Dose-response of Blood Pressure Variability in Stroke and Coronary Heart Disease.中风和冠心病中血压变异性的剂量反应
Curr Hypertens Rev. 2025;21(2):94-101. doi: 10.2174/0115734021346604250214071418.
6
Association of the blood levels of specific volatile organic compounds with nonfatal cardio-cerebrovascular events in US adults.特定挥发性有机化合物的血液水平与美国成年人非致命性心脑血管事件的关联。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 26;24(1):616. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18115-7.
7
Longitudinal Adherence to Diabetes Quality Indicators and Cardiac Disease: A Nationwide Population-Based Historical Cohort Study of Patients With Pharmacologically Treated Diabetes.长期坚持糖尿病质量指标与心脏疾病:基于全国人口的药物治疗糖尿病患者的历史队列研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Oct 4;11(19):e025603. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025603. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
8
The Effect of Blood Pressure Variability on Coronary Atherosclerosis Plaques.血压变异性对冠状动脉粥样硬化斑块的影响。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 15;9:803810. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.803810. eCollection 2022.
9
Association of Urinary Potassium Excretion with Blood Pressure Variability and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Pre-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease.尿钾排泄与透析前慢性肾脏病患者血压变异性及心血管结局的关系。
Nutrients. 2021 Dec 13;13(12):4443. doi: 10.3390/nu13124443.

本文引用的文献

1
Blood pressure levels and cardiovascular risk according to age in patients with diabetes mellitus: a nationwide population-based cohort study.糖尿病患者血压水平及心血管风险与年龄的关系:一项基于全国人群的队列研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 Oct 19;19(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01156-8.
2
Prognostic importance of visit-to-visit blood pressure variability for micro- and macrovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: The Rio de Janeiro Type 2 Diabetes Cohort Study.2 型糖尿病患者的血压变异性与微血管和大血管结局的预后意义:里约热内卢 2 型糖尿病队列研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 May 2;19(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01030-7.
3
Searching for optimal blood pressure targets in type 2 diabetic patients with coronary artery disease.寻找伴有冠状动脉疾病的 2 型糖尿病患者的最佳血压目标值。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019 Nov 16;18(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0959-1.
4
Association between blood pressure variability, cardiovascular disease and mortality in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.血压变异性与 2 型糖尿病患者心血管疾病和死亡的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Dec;21(12):2587-2598. doi: 10.1111/dom.13828. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
5
Effects of Blood Pressure Lowering on Clinical Outcomes According to Baseline Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.降压治疗对 2 型糖尿病患者临床结局的影响:基于基线血压和心血管风险分层。
Hypertension. 2019 Jun;73(6):1291-1299. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.12414.
6
Number of blood pressure measurements needed to estimate long-term visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability for predicting cardiovascular risk: a 10-year retrospective cohort study in a primary care clinic in Malaysia.需要多少次血压测量来估计长期随访收缩压变异性以预测心血管风险:马来西亚一家初级保健诊所的 10 年回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 20;9(4):e025322. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025322.
7
Visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction predicts long-term cardiovascular outcomes.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的血压变异性与长期心血管结局相关。
J Hum Hypertens. 2019 Apr;33(4):259-266. doi: 10.1038/s41371-019-0176-0. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
8
Impaired baroreflex sensitivity and increased systolic blood pressure variability in chronic post-ischemic stroke.慢性缺血性中风后压力反射敏感性受损及收缩压变异性增加。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2018 Oct 8;73:e253. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2018/e253.
9
Progression of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes.2 型糖尿病患者的心血管自主神经病变和心血管疾病的进展。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018 Aug 2;17(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12933-018-0752-6.
10
Blood pressure variability and risk of cardiovascular events and death in patients with hypertension and different baseline risks.血压变异性与不同基线风险的高血压患者心血管事件和死亡风险。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jun 21;39(24):2243-2251. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx760.