• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2003-2016 年商业保险患者中基于初次修复方法的视网膜脱离再次手术需求。

Need for Retinal Detachment Reoperation Based on Primary Repair Method Among Commercially Insured Patients, 2003-2016.

机构信息

From the Department of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, (M.G.R.R., S.P.), Palo Alto.

Department of Ophthalmology, Wayne and Gladys Valley Center for Vision, University of California, (A.R.A.), San Francisco.

出版信息

Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep;229:71-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.04.007. Epub 2021 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajo.2021.04.007
PMID:33895151
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10728497/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To examine associations between primary repair, patient characteristics, and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) reoperation.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

We used administrative claims to identify enrollees with incident RRD treatment by laser barricade, pneumatic retinopexy (PR), pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), or scleral buckle (SB) between 2003 and 2016. Analysis excluded patients with less than 3 years of continuous enrollment, previous RRD diagnosis, or repair. We determined reoperation frequency (PPV, PR, or SB) within 90 days postrepair and used multivariable logistic regression to identify associations between reoperation and patient and primary repair characteristics.

RESULTS

Of 16,190 patients with documented primary RRD repair, 2,918 (18.0%) required reoperation within 90 days. Reoperation was significantly associated with male sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.24, P < .001), pseudophakia (OR 1.25, P < .001), vitreous hemorrhage (OR 1.22, P = .001), and worse systemic health (OR 1.19-1.25, P < .05, for Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥3). Pseudophakia had higher reoperation odds after all primary procedures except PPV. In addition, 28.7% of primary PR cases required reoperation, vs 19.1% of SB and 17.9% of PPV repairs. Adjusting for other patient characteristics, PR had highest odds of reoperation (OR 1.90, P < .001, vs primary PPV). Primary laser barricade had lowest odds of reoperation (OR 0.49, P < .001). PPV was the most frequent reoperation procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly 1 in 5 patients require reoperation within 90 days after primary RRD repair. Cases requiring only primary laser barricade had lowest reoperation odds, likely representing less severe RRDs. Primary PR had highest reoperation odds; PPV and SB were similar to each other. These findings are important for patient education and surgical decision-making.

摘要

目的

研究原发性修复、患者特征与孔源性视网膜脱离(RRD)再手术之间的关联。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

方法

我们使用行政索赔数据,确定了 2003 年至 2016 年间接受激光阻挡、气液交换(PR)、经睫状体平坦部玻璃体切除术(PPV)或巩膜扣带术(SB)治疗的新发 RRD 患者。分析排除了连续入组时间少于 3 年、有 RRD 既往史或修复术的患者。我们确定了修复后 90 天内的再手术频率(PPV、PR 或 SB),并使用多变量逻辑回归分析识别再手术与患者和原发性修复特征之间的关系。

结果

在 16190 例有记录的原发性 RRD 修复患者中,2918 例(18.0%)在 90 天内需要再次手术。再手术与男性(比值比 [OR] 1.24,P <.001)、白内障(OR 1.25,P <.001)、玻璃体积血(OR 1.22,P =.001)和较差的全身健康状况(OR 1.19-1.25,P <.05,Charlson 合并症指数≥3)显著相关。除了 PPV 外,所有主要手术中白内障的再手术几率更高。此外,28.7%的原发性 PR 病例需要再手术,而 SB 和 PPV 修复术的再手术率分别为 19.1%和 17.9%。调整其他患者特征后,PR 的再手术几率最高(OR 1.90,P <.001,与原发性 PPV 相比)。原发性激光阻挡术的再手术几率最低(OR 0.49,P <.001)。PPV 是最常见的再手术程序。

结论

近 1/5 的患者在原发性 RRD 修复后 90 天内需要再次手术。仅接受原发性激光阻挡术的患者再手术几率最低,可能代表 RRD 程度较轻。原发性 PR 的再手术几率最高;PPV 和 SB 彼此相似。这些发现对于患者教育和手术决策很重要。

相似文献

1
Need for Retinal Detachment Reoperation Based on Primary Repair Method Among Commercially Insured Patients, 2003-2016.2003-2016 年商业保险患者中基于初次修复方法的视网膜脱离再次手术需求。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep;229:71-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.04.007. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
2
Sex Differences in the Repair of Retinal Detachments in the United States.美国视网膜脱离修复中的性别差异。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov;219:284-294. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.06.039. Epub 2020 Jul 5.
3
Primary Retinal Detachment Outcomes Study: Pseudophakic Retinal Detachment Outcomes: Primary Retinal Detachment Outcomes Study Report Number 3.原发性视网膜脱离结局研究:人工晶状体眼视网膜脱离结局:原发性视网膜脱离结局研究报告第 3 号。
Ophthalmology. 2020 Nov;127(11):1507-1514. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.05.005. Epub 2020 May 8.
4
Association of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment and Outcomes With the Day of the Week That Patients Undergo a Repair or Receive a Diagnosis.孔源性视网膜脱离及其治疗或诊断日与结局的相关性。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 Feb 1;138(2):156-163. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.5253.
5
Outcomes of Pars Plana Vitrectomy Alone versus Combined Scleral Buckling plus Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Primary Retinal Detachment.单纯板层巩膜扣带术与巩膜扣带术联合玻璃体切除术治疗原发性视网膜脱离的疗效比较。
Ophthalmol Retina. 2021 Feb;5(2):169-175. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2020.09.013. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
6
Comparison of pars plana vitrectomy for retinal detachment after failed pneumatic retinopexy and primary pars plana vitrectomy.气体视网膜固定术失败后行玻璃体切除术与原发性玻璃体切除术治疗视网膜脱离的比较。
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2019 Feb;42(2):146-152. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
7
Primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment - surgical methods and anatomical outcome.原发性孔源性视网膜脱离——手术方法及解剖学结果
Acta Ophthalmol. 2017 May;95(3):247-251. doi: 10.1111/aos.13295. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
8
Pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckling for repairing simple rhegmatogenous retinal detachments.玻璃体切除术与巩膜扣带术治疗单纯孔源性视网膜脱离的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 8;3(3):CD009562. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009562.pub2.
9
Primary Retinal Detachment Outcomes Study Report Number 2: Phakic Retinal Detachment Outcomes.原发性视网膜脱离结局研究报告第 2 号:有晶状体眼视网膜脱离结局。
Ophthalmology. 2020 Aug;127(8):1077-1085. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.03.007. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
10
Vitrectomy versus Combined Vitrectomy and Scleral Buckle for Repair of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment with Vitreous Hemorrhage.玻璃体切割术与巩膜扣带术联合治疗玻璃体积血性原发性孔源性视网膜脱离。
Ophthalmol Retina. 2022 Mar;6(3):228-233. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2021.10.001. Epub 2021 Oct 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Cystoid Macular Edema after Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair with Pars Plana Vitrectomy: Rate, Risk Factors, and Outcomes.玻璃体切割术治疗孔源性视网膜脱离复位术后的黄斑囊样水肿:发生率、危险因素及预后
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 21;11(16):4914. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164914.
2
Scleral Buckling: A Look at the Past, Present and Future in View of Recent Findings on the Importance of Photoreceptor Re-Alignment Following Retinal Re-Attachment.巩膜扣带术:鉴于近期关于视网膜复位后光感受器重新排列重要性的研究结果,回顾其过去、现在与未来
Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Jun 16;16:1971-1984. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S359309. eCollection 2022.
3
Accuracy of segmented measurement of axial length in ultra-high myopia filled with silicone oil using immersion B-scan ultrasonography.使用浸入式B超超声检查测量硅油填充的超高度近视患者眼轴长度的分段测量准确性。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2022 May 18;15(5):793-799. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2022.05.16. eCollection 2022.
4
Differences in Axial Length and IOL Power Based on Alternative A-Scan or Fellow-Eye Biometry in Macula-Off Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Eyes.基于黄斑脱离性孔源性视网膜脱离眼的替代A超或健眼生物测量法的眼轴长度和人工晶状体度数差异。
Ophthalmol Ther. 2022 Feb;11(1):347-354. doi: 10.1007/s40123-021-00439-x. Epub 2021 Dec 8.

本文引用的文献

1
The Relative Impact of Patient, Physician, and Geographic Factors on Variation in Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Management.患者、医生和地理因素对原发性孔源性视网膜脱离治疗方式变化的相对影响。
Ophthalmology. 2020 Jan;127(1):97-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.04.019. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
2
Long-term Clinical Results of Vitrectomy and Scleral Buckling in Treatment of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment.玻璃体切除术联合巩膜扣带术治疗孔源性视网膜脱离的长期临床结果
ScientificWorldJournal. 2019 Mar 6;2019:5416806. doi: 10.1155/2019/5416806. eCollection 2019.
3
Pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckling for repairing simple rhegmatogenous retinal detachments.玻璃体切除术与巩膜扣带术治疗单纯孔源性视网膜脱离的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 8;3(3):CD009562. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009562.pub2.
4
The Pneumatic Retinopexy versus Vitrectomy for the Management of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Outcomes Randomized Trial (PIVOT).原发性孔源性视网膜脱离经气液交换与玻璃体切割手术治疗效果的随机临床试验(PIVOT)。
Ophthalmology. 2019 Apr;126(4):531-539. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.11.014. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
5
Choice of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair Method in US Commercially Insured and Medicare Advantage Patients, 2003-2016.2003-2016 年美国商业保险和医疗保险优势计划患者原发性孔源性视网膜脱离修复方法的选择。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec;196:82-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.08.024. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
6
Comparison of Pneumatic Retinopexy and Scleral Buckle for Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair.原发性孔源性视网膜脱离修复术中巩膜扣带术与气体视网膜固定术的比较
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2017 Nov 1;48(11):887-893. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20171030-03.
7
A retrospective study comparing outcomes of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair by scleral buckling and pars plana vitrectomy in Finland.一项在芬兰进行的回顾性研究,比较巩膜扣带术和平坦部玻璃体切除术治疗原发性孔源性视网膜脱离的疗效。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar 10;11:503-509. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S128746. eCollection 2017.
8
Primary Repair of Moderate Severity Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: A Critical Decision-Making Algorithm.中度严重性孔源性视网膜脱离的一期修复:一种关键决策算法
Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2016 Spring;5(1):18-31.
9
Scleral buckling in phakic uncomplicated primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: long-term outcomes.有晶状体的单纯原发性孔源性视网膜脱离的巩膜扣带术:长期疗效
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar 10;27(2):220-225. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000914. Epub 2016 Dec 31.
10
Outcomes after Failed Pneumatic Retinopexy for Retinal Detachment.视网膜脱离行巩膜扣带术后失败的结果。
Ophthalmology. 2016 May;123(5):1137-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.017. Epub 2016 Mar 5.