Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Department of Biostatistics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Ophthalmol Retina. 2021 Feb;5(2):169-175. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2020.09.013. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
We compared the outcomes of primary uncomplicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair using pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) alone versus combined scleral buckling plus PPV (SB+PPV).
Retrospective, observational study.
Patients with primary RRD who underwent PPV or SB+PPV from June 1, 2014, through December 31, 2017.
We performed a single-institution, retrospective, observational study of 488 consecutive patients with primary RRD repaired via PPV alone or SB+PPV and gas tamponade. We excluded patients younger than 18 years and those with advanced proliferative vitreoretinopathy, giant retinal tear, trauma, or secondary forms of RRD. We performed logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses to identify potential risk factors associated with a retinal redetachment.
Single-operation anatomic success (SOAS), defined as adequate retinal reattachment achieved with only 1 procedure.
The mean follow-up interval was 14.3 months. Single-operation anatomic success and final anatomic success were achieved in 425 eyes (87.1%) and 487 eyes (99.8%), respectively. Single-operation anatomic success was achieved in 90 of 111 eyes (81.1%) with PPV alone compared with 345 of 374 eyes (92.2%) with SB+PPV (P = 0.0010). Scleral buckling plus PPV showed greater SOAS than PPV alone in phakic eyes (P < 0.0001), but not in eyes with a posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL). Retinal redetachments occurred on average at 1.5 and 9 months after the initial surgery. Significant best-corrected visual acuity improvement was associated with SOAS (P < 0.0001).
Scleral buckling plus PPV resulted in greater SOAS outcomes than PPV alone for primary RRD repair. Phakic eyes achieved greater surgical success with SB+PPV, whereas eyes with a PCIOL achieved similar results with both methods. Most retinal redetachments occurred within the initial postoperative 3-month period. Single-operation anatomic success was associated with statistically significant visual improvement.
我们比较了单纯玻璃体切除术(PPV)与巩膜扣带术联合玻璃体切除术(SB+PPV)治疗原发性单纯孔源性视网膜脱离(RRD)的疗效。
回顾性观察性研究。
2014 年 6 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间接受 PPV 或 SB+PPV 联合气体填充治疗的原发性 RRD 患者。
我们对 488 例接受单纯 PPV 或 SB+PPV 联合气体填充治疗的原发性 RRD 患者进行了单中心回顾性观察性研究。我们排除了年龄小于 18 岁的患者,以及有晚期增生性玻璃体视网膜病变、巨大视网膜裂孔、创伤或继发性 RRD 的患者。我们进行了逻辑回归和 Cox 比例风险回归分析,以确定与视网膜再脱离相关的潜在危险因素。
单次手术解剖成功率(SOAS),定义为仅通过 1 次手术即可获得充分的视网膜复位。
平均随访时间为 14.3 个月。425 只眼(87.1%)和 487 只眼(99.8%)达到了单次手术解剖成功和最终解剖成功。单纯 PPV 治疗组的 111 只眼中有 90 只(81.1%)达到 SOAS,而 SB+PPV 治疗组的 374 只眼中有 345 只(92.2%)达到 SOAS(P=0.0010)。在有晶状体眼患者中,巩膜扣带术联合玻璃体切除术的 SOAS 优于单纯玻璃体切除术(P<0.0001),但在后房人工晶状体(PCIOL)眼患者中则不然。视网膜再脱离平均发生在初次手术后 1.5 个月和 9 个月。最佳矫正视力的显著改善与 SOAS 相关(P<0.0001)。
对于原发性 RRD 修复,巩膜扣带术联合玻璃体切除术的 SOAS 结果优于单纯玻璃体切除术。有晶状体眼患者接受 SB+PPV 治疗的手术成功率更高,而接受 PCIOL 的眼两种方法的效果相似。大多数视网膜再脱离发生在术后最初的 3 个月内。单次手术解剖成功与统计学上显著的视力改善相关。