Lu Fengju, Shen Boxiong, Li Shuhao, Liu Lijun, Zhao Peng, Si Meng
School of Chemical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, 300401, China; School of Energy & Environmental Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, 300401, China.
School of Energy & Environmental Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, 300401, China.
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jul 1;289:112535. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112535. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
In comparison with various restaurant cuisines, common cooking methods are more represented in residential cooking. Rather than the exhaust pipe or the ambient environment in the cooking room, the respiration zone better reflects the health risks for operators. In this study, the concentrations of total volatile organic compound (TVOC) released from six typical cooking methods were monitored online in the respiratory zone, and the VOCs were analysed by GC-MS. The results demonstrated that the intensities of exposure to TVOC for the different cooking methods decreased as follows: stir-frying (3.809 mg/m) > quick-frying (2.724 mg/m) > deep-frying (2.465 mg/m) > boiling (1.161 mg/m)≈stewing (1.149 mg/m) > limit in China (0.600 mg/m) > steaming (0.440 mg/m). The intense ventilation mode of the ventilator reduced exposure to TVOC by 45-63% relative to the medium mode. Eleven types of VOCs (approximately 200 compounds) were found in Chinese residential cooking fumes, and the predominant contaminants were aldehydes, followed by alkanes, unsaturated aldehydes, alcohols and alkenes. The mass percentage of aromatic hydrocarbons in all VOCs emitted from Chinese residential cooking was only 1%, while the value was 17-48% for commercial restaurants. The results of a health risk assessment revealed that the total potential carcinogenic risk level for VOCs released by six residential cooking methods decreased as follows: deep-frying (5.75) > stir-frying (3.95) > quick-frying (2.94) > stewing (1.99) > boiling (1.73) > steaming (1.48). Chinese residential cooking, and especially deep frying, has potential health impacts for the operator.
与各类餐厅菜肴相比,常见烹饪方法在家庭烹饪中更为常见。呼吸区比烹饪室中的排气管或周围环境更能反映操作人员面临的健康风险。在本研究中,对六种典型烹饪方法释放的总挥发性有机化合物(TVOC)浓度在呼吸区进行了在线监测,并采用气相色谱 - 质谱联用仪(GC - MS)对挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)进行了分析。结果表明,不同烹饪方法的TVOC暴露强度从高到低依次为:炒菜(3.809毫克/立方米)> 快速油炸(2.724毫克/立方米)> 深度油炸(2.465毫克/立方米)> 煮(1.161毫克/立方米)≈ 炖(1.149毫克/立方米)> 中国限值(0.600毫克/立方米)> 蒸(0.440毫克/立方米)。与中等通风模式相比,强力通风模式可使TVOC暴露降低45 - 63%。在中国家庭烹饪油烟中发现了11种VOCs(约200种化合物),主要污染物为醛类,其次是烷烃、不饱和醛、醇类和烯烃。中国家庭烹饪排放的所有VOCs中芳烃的质量百分比仅为1%,而商业餐厅的这一数值为17 - 48%。健康风险评估结果显示,六种家庭烹饪方法释放的VOCs的总潜在致癌风险水平从高到低依次为:深度油炸(5.75)> 炒菜(3.95)> 快速油炸(2.94)> 炖(1.99)> 煮(1.73)> 蒸(1.48)。中国家庭烹饪,尤其是深度油炸,对操作人员有潜在的健康影响。