• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Efficacy of Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections for Grade 3 Symptomatic Degenerative Meniscal Lesions: A 1-Year Follow-up Prospective Study.自体富血小板血浆注射治疗 3 级有症状退行性半月板病变的疗效:为期 1 年的前瞻性研究。
Sports Health. 2022 Mar-Apr;14(2):227-236. doi: 10.1177/19417381211011074. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
2
Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Hyaluronic Acid Injections for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: Results at 5 Years of a Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.富血小板血浆与透明质酸注射治疗膝骨关节炎:一项 5 年双盲、随机对照试验的结果。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Feb;47(2):347-354. doi: 10.1177/0363546518814532. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
3
Clinical outcome and risk factor predictive for failure of autologous PRP injections for low-to-moderate knee osteoarthritis.自体富血小板血浆注射治疗轻至中度膝关节骨关节炎的临床结局及失败风险预测因素。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2021 May-Aug;29(2):23094990211021922. doi: 10.1177/23094990211021922.
4
Comparing efficacy of a single intraarticular injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) combined with different hyaluronans for knee osteoarthritis: a randomized-controlled clinical trial.比较富血小板血浆(PRP)联合不同透明质酸单次关节内注射治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效:一项随机对照临床试验。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Nov 4;23(1):954. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05906-5.
5
The Effectiveness of Leukocyte-Poor Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections for Symptomatic Mild to Moderate Osteoarthritis of the Knee With Joint Effusion or Bone Marrow Lesions in a Japanese Population: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.白细胞浓缩富血小板血浆注射治疗日本人群伴关节积液或骨髓病变的症状性轻至中度膝关节骨关节炎的疗效:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验。
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Aug;52(10):2493-2502. doi: 10.1177/03635465241263073. Epub 2024 Aug 3.
6
Hyaluronic Acid Versus Platelet-Rich Plasma: A Prospective, Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Clinical Outcomes and Effects on Intra-articular Biology for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis.透明质酸与富血小板血浆:一项比较临床结果及对膝关节骨关节炎关节内生物学影响的前瞻性、双盲随机对照试验
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Feb;45(2):339-346. doi: 10.1177/0363546516665809. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
7
Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Hyaluronic Acid for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.富血小板血浆与透明质酸治疗膝关节骨关节炎的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2021 Jan;49(1):249-260. doi: 10.1177/0363546520909397. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
8
Platelet-Rich Plasma Intra-articular Knee Injections Show No Superiority Versus Viscosupplementation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.富血小板血浆膝关节腔内注射与关节腔注射透明质酸钠相比无优势:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jul;43(7):1575-82. doi: 10.1177/0363546515582027. Epub 2015 May 7.
9
Clinical and radiographic comparison of a single LP-PRP injection, a single hyaluronic acid injection and daily NSAID administration with a 52-week follow-up: a randomized controlled trial.单次富血小板血浆注射、单次透明质酸注射及每日非甾体抗炎药给药的临床与影像学比较并随访52周:一项随机对照试验
J Orthop Traumatol. 2018 Aug 20;19(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s10195-018-0501-3.
10
Bone marrow aspirate concentrate versus platelet-rich plasma for treating knee osteoarthritis: a one-year non-randomized retrospective comparative study.骨髓抽吸浓缩物与富血小板血浆治疗膝骨关节炎:一年非随机回顾性对比研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jan 3;23(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04910-5.

引用本文的文献

1
No Long-Term Superiority of Cord-Derived PRP over Autologous PRP in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Cohort Study.脐带血源性富血小板血浆在膝关节骨关节炎中并不优于自体富血小板血浆:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025 Apr 21;10(2):138. doi: 10.3390/jfmk10020138.
2
Platelet-rich plasma for nonoperative management of degenerative meniscal tears: A systematic review.富血小板血浆用于退行性半月板撕裂的非手术治疗:一项系统评价。
J Orthop. 2024 Mar 12;54:67-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.03.009. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Degenerative Meniscus Tears Treated Nonoperatively With Platelet-Rich Plasma Yield Variable Clinical and Imaging Outcomes: A Systematic Review.富血小板血浆非手术治疗退行性半月板撕裂的临床和影像学结果各异:一项系统评价
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024 Feb 23;6(2):100916. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100916. eCollection 2024 Apr.
4
Current Status and Advancements in Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy.富血小板血浆疗法的现状与进展
Cureus. 2023 Oct 17;15(10):e47176. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47176. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
High survival rate after the combination of intrameniscal and intraarticular infiltrations of platelet-rich plasma as conservative treatment for meniscal lesions.富血小板血浆关节内和半月板内注射联合作为半月板损伤的保守治疗具有高存活率。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Oct;31(10):4246-4256. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07470-4. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
6
Platelet-Rich Plasma Gel Matrix (PRP-GM): Description of a New Technique.富血小板血浆凝胶基质(PRP-GM):一种新技术的描述。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Dec 19;9(12):817. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9120817.
7
Platelet-rich plasma use in meniscus repair treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies.富血小板血浆在半月板修复治疗中的应用:临床研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Oct 8;17(1):446. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03293-0.
8
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) augmentation does not result in more favourable outcomes in arthroscopic meniscal repair: a meta-analysis.富血小板血浆(PRP)增强在关节镜半月板修复中并没有带来更有利的结果:一项荟萃分析。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2022 Feb 7;23(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s10195-022-00630-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: an expert opinion and proposal for a novel classification and coding system.富含血小板的血浆治疗膝关节骨关节炎:专家意见和新型分类及编码系统建议。
Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2020 Dec;20(12):1447-1460. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2020.1798925. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
2
Degenerative Meniscus Lesions: An Expert Consensus Statement Using the Modified Delphi Technique.退变性半月板损伤:应用改良 Delphi 技术的专家共识声明。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Feb;36(2):501-512. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.014. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
3
The temporal effect of intra-articular ozone injections on pain in knee osteoarthritis.关节内臭氧注射对膝骨关节炎疼痛的时间效应。
Br Med Bull. 2019 Dec 11;132(1):33-44. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldz028.
4
Platelet-Rich Plasma Reduces Failure Risk for Isolated Meniscal Repairs but Provides No Benefit for Meniscal Repairs With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.富血小板血浆可降低半月板修复术失败风险,但对前交叉韧带重建的半月板修复术无益处。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Jul;47(8):1789-1796. doi: 10.1177/0363546519852616. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
5
Short-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Trephination with a Platelet Rich Plasma Intrameniscal Injection for the Repair of Degenerative Meniscal Lesions. A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Study.富血小板血浆关节内注射联合半月板钻孔治疗半月板退行性病变的短期疗效:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、平行对照、安慰剂对照研究。
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Feb 16;20(4):856. doi: 10.3390/ijms20040856.
6
Biologic Therapies for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis.生物制剂治疗膝骨关节炎。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Apr;34(4):801-813. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.12.001. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
7
Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Hyaluronic Acid Injections for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: Results at 5 Years of a Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.富血小板血浆与透明质酸注射治疗膝骨关节炎:一项 5 年双盲、随机对照试验的结果。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Feb;47(2):347-354. doi: 10.1177/0363546518814532. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
8
A contemporary view of platelet-rich plasma therapies: moving toward refined clinical protocols and precise indications.富血小板血浆疗法的当代观点:迈向精细化临床方案与精准适应症
Regen Med. 2018 Sep;13(6):717-728. doi: 10.2217/rme-2018-0042. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
9
Autologous US-guided PRP injection versus US-guided focal extracorporeal shock wave therapy for chronic lateral epicondylitis: A minimum of 2-year follow-up retrospective comparative study.超声引导下自体富血小板血浆注射与超声引导下局部体外冲击波疗法治疗慢性外侧上髁炎:至少2年随访的回顾性对照研究
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018 Jan-Apr;26(1):2309499017749986. doi: 10.1177/2309499017749986.
10
A Call for Standardization in Platelet-Rich Plasma Preparation Protocols and Composition Reporting: A Systematic Review of the Clinical Orthopaedic Literature.呼吁标准化富血小板血浆制备方案和组成报告:临床矫形文献的系统评价。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Oct 18;99(20):1769-1779. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01374.

自体富血小板血浆注射治疗 3 级有症状退行性半月板病变的疗效:为期 1 年的前瞻性研究。

Efficacy of Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections for Grade 3 Symptomatic Degenerative Meniscal Lesions: A 1-Year Follow-up Prospective Study.

机构信息

Department of Surgical Sciences (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.

Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.

出版信息

Sports Health. 2022 Mar-Apr;14(2):227-236. doi: 10.1177/19417381211011074. Epub 2021 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1177/19417381211011074
PMID:33896253
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8883415/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections have been proposed as a biologic option to provide symptomatic relief and delay surgery in patients with degenerative joint disease of osteoarthritis (OA). The efficacy of autologous PRP on symptomatic degenerative meniscal lesions (DMLs) has never been investigated.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that patients with symptomatic DMLs without OA undergoing autologous PRP injections experience a significant clinical improvement at 12 months.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective case series.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.

METHODS

A total of 69 patients with symptomatic DMLs without radiographic evidence of knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence radiographic grading scale 0-1) received 4 autologous PRP injections once a week. Patients were prospectively evaluated before the injection and then at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Evaluation was based on Lysholm knee scoring scale (primary outcome), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), Tegner activity scale, and visual analogue scale scores.

RESULTS

Patients treated with PRP injections demonstrated an improving knee function and symptoms over the duration of the study. A significant improvement from baseline to 12 months was observed in all the outcome measures, and no patients experienced failure or required surgery during the follow-up. Patients younger than 50 years reported lower subjective level of pain and higher Tegner activity scale at baseline and had significantly better Lysholm knee scoring scale ( = 0.03) and WOMAC ( = 0.03) scores at 6 months, as well as better range of motion at 3, 6, and 12 months ( < 0.001). Thirty-three (47.8%) patients were very satisfied, 26 (37.7%) satisfied, 8 (11.6%) partially satisfied, and 2 (2.9 %) not satisfied, with 62 (89.8%) patients willing to repeat the same treatment. No patient was lost to follow-up and no patient experienced adverse reaction, infection, failure, recurrence or underwent further surgery.

CONCLUSION

PRP injections provide short-term benefits in symptomatic DMLs. Although promising results were evident at 12 months, this is a preliminary study and no definitive recommendation can be made based, for example, on longer follow-up.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This research supports the use of autologous PRP injections for symptomatic DMLs.

摘要

背景

富含血小板的血浆(PRP)注射已被提议作为一种生物选择,为退行性骨关节炎(OA)患者的退行性关节疾病提供症状缓解并延迟手术。自体 PRP 对有症状的半月板退行性病变(DML)的疗效从未被研究过。

假设

我们假设患有 DML 且没有 OA 症状的患者接受自体 PRP 注射治疗后,在 12 个月时会有明显的临床改善。

研究设计

前瞻性病例系列研究。

证据等级

4 级。

方法

共 69 例有症状的 DML 患者,无膝关节 OA 的影像学证据(Kellgren-Lawrence 放射学分级 0-1),每周接受 4 次自体 PRP 注射。患者在注射前和 1、3、6 和 12 个月进行前瞻性评估。评估基于 Lysholm 膝关节评分量表(主要结果)、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学关节炎指数(WOMAC)、Tegner 活动量表和视觉模拟评分量表。

结果

接受 PRP 注射治疗的患者在研究期间膝关节功能和症状逐渐改善。所有结局指标在基线至 12 个月时均有显著改善,随访期间无患者出现失败或需要手术。年龄小于 50 岁的患者报告基线时疼痛程度较低,Tegner 活动量表评分较高,在 6 个月时 Lysholm 膝关节评分量表( = 0.03)和 WOMAC( = 0.03)评分显著改善,在 3、6 和 12 个月时的运动范围显著改善(<0.001)。33 例(47.8%)患者非常满意,26 例(37.7%)满意,8 例(11.6%)部分满意,2 例(2.9%)不满意,62 例(89.8%)患者愿意重复同样的治疗。无患者失访,无患者出现不良反应、感染、失败、复发或进一步手术。

结论

PRP 注射为有症状的 DML 提供了短期益处。尽管 12 个月时的结果很有希望,但这是一项初步研究,不能基于例如更长的随访来做出明确的推荐。

临床相关性

本研究支持使用自体 PRP 注射治疗有症状的 DML。