Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung Branch, Keelung 204, and School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung Branch, Keelung 204, and School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.
Injury. 2021 Jul;52(7):1903-1907. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.04.023. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
The comparison of mortality and morbidity between distal femur (DF) and hip fracture in the old age is rarely reported in the literature. We aim to analyze a nationwide database among the elderly to compare the outcomes between hip fractures and distal femur fractures in the United States.
A retrospective analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank was queried between 2007-2014 to identify distal femur (DF) and hip fracture patients greater than 65 years of age. Outcomes analyzed included in-hospital mortality, total hospital length of stay(LOS), intensive care unit length of stay(ICU-LOS), length of ventilation use and hospital discharge disposition. Multivariable regression models were performed to adjust for potential confounders. Statistical significance was established at p < 0.001.
26,325 (10.1%) and 233,213 (89.9%) patients reported a diagnosis of DF and hip fracture, respectively. The inpatient mortality rate was significantly higher in the distal femur fracture group (8.3% vs. 6.7%), with significantly longer LOS (7.87 vs. 6.65), ICU-LOS (1.50 vs. 0.73), and required ventilation days (0.74 vs. 0.27). Multivariable analyses demonstrated that hip fracture patients had a lower mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.80; 95% CI [0.76, -0.85]; p < 0.001), shorter LOS ([aOR], -0.31; 95% CI [-0.39, -0.23]; P < 0.001), and more likely to be discharged home ([aOR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.85, 0.91; P < 0.001, compared to DF fracture patients.
After adjusting for potential factors, DF fracture patients have a significantly higher mortality, longer LOS, and less likely to be discharged home compared to hip fractures among the elderly. These results may suggest clinicians and caregivers for closely monitoring of clinical conditions for these patients.
III.
关于老年人远端股骨(DF)和髋部骨折的死亡率和发病率比较,文献中很少有报道。我们旨在通过分析美国全国创伤数据库,比较老年人中髋部骨折和远端股骨骨折的结果。
对 2007 年至 2014 年国家创伤数据库进行回顾性分析,以确定年龄大于 65 岁的远端股骨(DF)和髋部骨折患者。分析的结果包括院内死亡率、总住院时间(LOS)、重症监护病房 LOS(ICU-LOS)、通气使用时间和出院去向。使用多变量回归模型调整潜在混杂因素。p<0.001 为统计学意义。
报告了 26325 例(10.1%)和 233213 例(89.9%)患者的诊断为 DF 和髋部骨折。远端股骨骨折组的住院死亡率明显更高(8.3%比 6.7%),LOS(7.87 比 6.65)、ICU-LOS(1.50 比 0.73)和通气天数(0.74 比 0.27)明显更长。多变量分析表明,髋部骨折患者死亡率较低(调整后的优势比[aOR],0.80;95%置信区间[CI],0.76,-0.85;p<0.001),LOS 更短([aOR],-0.31;95%CI[-0.39,-0.23];P<0.001),更有可能出院回家([aOR],0.88;95%CI,0.85,0.91;P<0.001,与 DF 骨折患者相比。
在调整了潜在因素后,与老年人髋部骨折相比,DF 骨折患者的死亡率显著更高,LOS 更长,出院回家的可能性更小。这些结果可能提示临床医生和护理人员密切监测这些患者的临床状况。
III 级。