Sullins D Paul
The Catholic University of America, Hyattsville, MD, USA.
Linacre Q. 2021 May;88(2):184-201. doi: 10.1177/0024363921989491. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
Is the system of norms comprising traditional, natural marriage-featuring formally enacted, irrevocable, exclusive man/woman sexual union preceded by chastity-essential for children's development and well-being, as Catholic teaching asserts? Review of an extensive body of diverse research finds that, compared to children continuously living with two parents, married parents, or their own biological parents, children in other family arrangements consistently experience lower emotional well-being, physical health, and academic achievement. Competing research has variously attributed this difference to a lack of married parents, two parents, complementary man/woman parents, or family stability, but these possibilities have not previously been studied in combination. To address this question, family structure differences and determinants of child well-being (reverse coded to show child distress) were examined using the 2008-2018 National Health Interview Surveys ( = 82,635). Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) for child emotional problems were higher with less than two parents (AOR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.27-1.56), unmarried parents (1.46, 95% CI 1.31-1.61), unstable parents (1.55, 95% CI 1.27-1.76), or less than two biological parents (AOR = 1.70, 95% CI 1.55-2.87 for one biological parent; 4.77, 95% CI 3.95-5.77 for no biological parents). When combined in the same model, only the lack of joint biological parentage accounted for higher distress, with outcomes significantly worse without the biological father than without the biological mother (interaction AOR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.04-1.71). This evidence strongly supports the claim that maximum child development occurs only in the persistent care of both of the child's own biological parents. Marriage benefits children primarily by ensuring such care. Implications are discussed.
Children raised apart from the care of both natural parents consistently experience lower developmental outcomes. Traditional, religious marriage norms-a lifelong, exclusive sexual union between man and woman-benefit children by establishing strong conditions that promote such care. More than any other family arrangement, marriage assures to children the care of their own mom and dad.
如天主教教义所主张的,包含传统的、以自然婚姻为特征的规范体系——正式制定的、不可撤销的、排他性的男女两性性结合,且婚前保持贞洁,这对孩子的成长和幸福至关重要——是否如此?对大量不同研究的综述发现,与持续与双亲、已婚父母或亲生父母生活在一起的孩子相比,处于其他家庭结构中的孩子在情感幸福、身体健康和学业成绩方面始终较差。相互竞争的研究将这种差异归因于缺乏已婚父母、双亲、互补的男女父母或家庭稳定性等各种因素,但此前尚未对这些可能性进行综合研究。为解决这个问题,利用《2008 - 2018年美国国家健康访谈调查》(n = 82,635)研究了家庭结构差异和儿童幸福的决定因素(反向编码以显示儿童苦恼程度)。双亲数量少于两个(调整后的优势比[AOR] = 1.42,95%置信区间[CI] 1.27 - 1.56)、父母未婚(1.46,95% CI 1.31 - 1.61)、父母关系不稳定(1.55,95% CI 1.27 - 1.76)或亲生父母数量少于两个(对于有一位亲生父母,AOR = 1.70,95% CI 1.55 - 2.87;对于没有亲生父母,4.77,95% CI 3.95 - 5.77)的情况下,儿童出现情感问题的调整后优势比更高。当在同一模型中综合考虑这些因素时,只有缺乏共同亲生父母这一因素导致苦恼程度更高,而且没有亲生父亲时的结果显著比没有亲生母亲时更差(交互作用AOR = 1.33,95% CI 1.04 - 1.71)。这一证据有力地支持了这样一种观点,即只有在孩子的亲生父母双方持续照料下,孩子才能实现最大程度的成长。婚姻对孩子有益主要是通过确保这种照料来实现的。文中对相关影响进行了讨论。
在没有亲生父母双方照料的环境中长大的孩子,其成长结果始终较差。传统的、宗教性的婚姻规范——男女之间终身排他的性结合——通过建立促进这种照料的有力条件,从而使孩子受益。与任何其他家庭结构相比,婚姻能确保孩子得到自己父母的照料。