Suppr超能文献

精神障碍中心智理论不同方面与症状群之间的关系:将心智理论解构为认知性、情感性和超心智理论

The Relationship Between Different Aspects of Theory of Mind and Symptom Clusters in Psychotic Disorders: Deconstructing Theory of Mind Into Cognitive, Affective, and Hyper Theory of Mind.

作者信息

Dorn Laura M-L, Struck Nele, Bitsch Florian, Falkenberg Irina, Kircher Tilo, Rief Winfried, Mehl Stephanie

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 9;12:607154. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.607154. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Several meta-analyses highlight pronounced problems in general Theory of Mind (ToM), the ability to infer other persons' mental states, in patients with psychosis in comparison to non-clinical controls. In addition, first studies suggest associations between Hyper-ToM, an exaggerated inference of mental states to others, and delusions. Research on different ToM subtypes (Cognitive ToM, Affective ToM, and Hyper-ToM) and symptom clusters of psychosis (positive, negative, and disorganized symptoms) have gathered conflicting findings. Thus, the present study examined group differences between patients with psychosis and non-clinical controls concerning Cognitive ToM/Affective ToM and Hyper-ToM. Further, the association between ToM subtypes and symptom clusters (positive, negative, and disorganized symptoms) were examined. Patients with psychotic disorders ( = 64, 1/3 with present delusions indicated by a minimum score of four in the P1 item) and non-clinical controls ( = 21) were examined with assessments of Cognitive ToM and Affective ToM abilities and Hyper-ToM errors using the Frith-Happé animations. Psychopathology was assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Patients with psychosis presented more pronounced problems in Cognitive and Affective ToM in comparison to non-clinical controls, whereas there were no group differences with regard to Hyper-ToM errors. Furthermore, deficits in Cognitive ToM were associated with general delusions, whereas problems in Affective ToM were associated with negative and disorganized symptoms. In addition, there was no association between Hyper-ToM errors and any symptoms when controlling for years of education. Our findings suggest that deficits in ToM subtypes might not be directly related to delusions and positive symptoms and are in line with more recently developed cognitive models of delusions. In addition, our results support the well-established finding of associations between ToM alterations and negative or disorganized symptoms. Our results shed light on the role of different dimensions of ToM in specific symptoms of psychosis.

摘要

多项荟萃分析强调,与非临床对照相比,精神病患者在一般心理理论(ToM)方面存在明显问题,心理理论即推断他人心理状态的能力。此外,初步研究表明,过度心理理论(Hyper-ToM),即对他人心理状态的过度推断,与妄想之间存在关联。关于不同心理理论亚型(认知心理理论、情感心理理论和过度心理理论)以及精神病症状群(阳性、阴性和紊乱症状)的研究结果相互矛盾。因此,本研究考察了精神病患者与非临床对照在认知心理理论/情感心理理论和过度心理理论方面的组间差异。此外,还考察了心理理论亚型与症状群(阳性、阴性和紊乱症状)之间的关联。对患有精神障碍的患者(n = 64,其中三分之一目前存在妄想,P1项目得分至少为4分)和非临床对照(n = 21)进行了研究,使用弗里思 - 哈佩动画评估他们的认知心理理论和情感心理理论能力以及过度心理理论错误。使用阳性和阴性症状量表评估精神病理学。与非临床对照相比,精神病患者在认知和情感心理理论方面存在更明显的问题,而在过度心理理论错误方面没有组间差异。此外,认知心理理论缺陷与一般性妄想有关,而情感心理理论问题与阴性和紊乱症状有关。此外,在控制受教育年限后,过度心理理论错误与任何症状之间均无关联。我们的研究结果表明,心理理论亚型的缺陷可能与妄想和阳性症状没有直接关系,这与最近发展的妄想认知模型一致。此外,我们的结果支持了心理理论改变与阴性或紊乱症状之间存在关联这一已确立的发现。我们的结果揭示了心理理论不同维度在精神病特定症状中的作用。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验