Super Laura, Hofmann Analise, Leung Connie, Ho Mabel, Harrower Emma, Adreak Najah, Rezaie Manesh Zohreh
Forest and Conservation Sciences The University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada.
Cellular and Physiological Sciences The University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada.
Ecol Evol. 2020 Nov 24;11(8):3464-3472. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6960. eCollection 2021 Apr.
Instructors can deliberately design for equity, diversity, and inclusion, including for large first-year classes, and now instructors have added challenges given COVID-19. Our paper explores the question: How do we integrate equity, diversity, and inclusion and universal design for learning (UDL) into first-year, undergraduate ecology and evolution introductory lessons given the COVID-19 pandemic? Given the large field exploring equity, diversity, and inclusion, we chose to focus on developing reflective practice question rubrics for before, during, and after lessons to encourage UDL for instructors, teaching assistants, and learners. We conducted a focus group within our team and discussed ideas related to online learning, including related pitfalls and solutions. Lastly, we created a figure to illustrate ideas and end with a general discussion. Our reflective practice questions for UDL rubrics, figure, focus group, and discussion aim to increase positive action for equity, diversity, and inclusion in the classroom and beyond.
教师可以有意识地为公平、多样性和包容性进行教学设计,包括针对大型的一年级课程,而现在由于新冠疫情,教师们又面临了新的挑战。我们的论文探讨了这样一个问题:在新冠疫情期间,如何将公平、多样性和包容性以及通用学习设计(UDL)融入到本科一年级的生态学和进化导论课程中?鉴于探索公平、多样性和包容性的领域范围广泛,我们选择专注于为课程前、课程中和课程后开发反思性实践问题评分标准,以鼓励教师、助教和学习者采用通用学习设计。我们在团队内部进行了一次焦点小组讨论,并讨论了与在线学习相关的想法,包括相关的陷阱和解决方案。最后,我们制作了一个图表来说明这些想法,并以一般性讨论作为结尾。我们为通用学习设计评分标准、图表、焦点小组讨论所提出的反思性实践问题,旨在促进在课堂内外为公平、多样性和包容性采取积极行动。