• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用广义线性模型和遗漏协变量在协变量自适应随机试验中检验治疗效果。

Testing for treatment effect in covariate-adaptive randomized trials with generalized linear models and omitted covariates.

作者信息

Li Yang, Ma Wei, Qin Yichen, Hu Feifang

机构信息

Center for Applied Statistics and School of Statistics, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.

Institute of Statistics and Big Data, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Sep;30(9):2148-2164. doi: 10.1177/09622802211008206. Epub 2021 Apr 26.

DOI:10.1177/09622802211008206
PMID:33899607
Abstract

Concerns have been expressed over the validity of statistical inference under covariate-adaptive randomization despite the extensive use in clinical trials. In the literature, the inferential properties under covariate-adaptive randomization have been mainly studied for continuous responses; in particular, it is well known that the usual two-sample -test for treatment effect is typically conservative. This phenomenon of invalid tests has also been found for generalized linear models without adjusting for the covariates and are sometimes more worrisome due to inflated Type I error. The purpose of this study is to examine the unadjusted test for treatment effect under generalized linear models and covariate-adaptive randomization. For a large class of covariate-adaptive randomization methods, we obtain the asymptotic distribution of the test statistic under the null hypothesis and derive the conditions under which the test is conservative, valid, or anti-conservative. Several commonly used generalized linear models, such as logistic regression and Poisson regression, are discussed in detail. An adjustment method is also proposed to achieve a valid size based on the asymptotic results. Numerical studies confirm the theoretical findings and demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed adjustment method.

摘要

尽管协变量自适应随机化在临床试验中被广泛使用,但人们对其统计推断的有效性仍表示担忧。在文献中,协变量自适应随机化下的推断性质主要是针对连续反应进行研究的;特别是,众所周知,用于治疗效果的常用双样本检验通常是保守的。在未对协变量进行调整的广义线性模型中也发现了这种无效检验的现象,而且由于第一类错误膨胀,有时情况更令人担忧。本研究的目的是检验广义线性模型和协变量自适应随机化下未调整的治疗效果检验。对于一大类协变量自适应随机化方法,我们在原假设下获得了检验统计量的渐近分布,并推导了检验是保守、有效或反保守的条件。详细讨论了几种常用的广义线性模型,如逻辑回归和泊松回归。还提出了一种调整方法,以根据渐近结果实现有效的检验规模。数值研究证实了理论结果,并证明了所提出调整方法的有效性。

相似文献

1
Testing for treatment effect in covariate-adaptive randomized trials with generalized linear models and omitted covariates.使用广义线性模型和遗漏协变量在协变量自适应随机试验中检验治疗效果。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Sep;30(9):2148-2164. doi: 10.1177/09622802211008206. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
2
Validity of tests under covariate-adaptive biased coin randomization and generalized linear models.协变量自适应偏倚硬币随机化和广义线性模型下检验的有效性
Biometrics. 2013 Dec;69(4):960-9. doi: 10.1111/biom.12062. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
3
Testing hypotheses under adaptive randomization with continuous covariates in clinical trials.临床试验中具有连续协变量的适应性随机化下的假设检验。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Jun;28(6):1609-1621. doi: 10.1177/0962280218770231. Epub 2018 May 17.
4
The impact of covariate misclassification using generalized linear regression under covariate-adaptive randomization.协变量自适应随机化下使用广义线性回归的协变量误分类的影响
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Jan;27(1):20-34. doi: 10.1177/0962280215616405. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
5
The impact of misclassification on covariate-adaptive randomized clinical trials.混杂因素自适应随机临床试验中分类错误的影响。
Biometrics. 2021 Jun;77(2):451-464. doi: 10.1111/biom.13308. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
6
Inference under Covariate-Adaptive Randomization.协变量自适应随机化下的推断
J Am Stat Assoc. 2018;113(524):1784-1796. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2017.1375934. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
7
Inference under covariate-adaptive randomization: A simulation study.协变量自适应随机化下的推断:一项模拟研究。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Apr;30(4):1072-1080. doi: 10.1177/0962280220985564. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
8
Regression analysis for covariate-adaptive randomization: A robust and efficient inference perspective.协变量自适应随机化的回归分析:稳健且有效的推断视角。
Stat Med. 2022 Dec 20;41(29):5645-5661. doi: 10.1002/sim.9585. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
9
An evaluation of constrained randomization for the design and analysis of group-randomized trials with binary outcomes.对具有二元结局的群组随机试验的设计与分析中受限随机化的评估。
Stat Med. 2017 Oct 30;36(24):3791-3806. doi: 10.1002/sim.7410. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
10
Evaluating tests for cluster-randomized trials with few clusters under generalized linear mixed models with covariate adjustment: A simulation study.在具有协变量调整的广义线性混合模型下评估少数群组随机试验的检验:一项模拟研究。
Stat Med. 2024 Jan 30;43(2):201-215. doi: 10.1002/sim.9950. Epub 2023 Nov 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Abnormal choroid plexus, hippocampus, and lateral ventricles volumes as markers of treatment-resistant major depressive disorder.异常脉络丛、海马体和侧脑室体积作为难治性重度抑郁症的标志物。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025 Feb;79(2):69-77. doi: 10.1111/pcn.13764. Epub 2024 Nov 19.