Li Fan, Turner Elizabeth L, Heagerty Patrick J, Murray David M, Vollmer William M, DeLong Elizabeth R
Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, 27705, NC, USA.
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, 27705, NC, USA.
Stat Med. 2017 Oct 30;36(24):3791-3806. doi: 10.1002/sim.7410. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
Group-randomized trials are randomized studies that allocate intact groups of individuals to different comparison arms. A frequent practical limitation to adopting such research designs is that only a limited number of groups may be available, and therefore, simple randomization is unable to adequately balance multiple group-level covariates between arms. Therefore, covariate-based constrained randomization was proposed as an allocation technique to achieve balance. Constrained randomization involves generating a large number of possible allocation schemes, calculating a balance score that assesses covariate imbalance, limiting the randomization space to a prespecified percentage of candidate allocations, and randomly selecting one scheme to implement. When the outcome is binary, a number of statistical issues arise regarding the potential advantages of such designs in making inference. In particular, properties found for continuous outcomes may not directly apply, and additional variations on statistical tests are available. Motivated by two recent trials, we conduct a series of Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate the statistical properties of model-based and randomization-based tests under both simple and constrained randomization designs, with varying degrees of analysis-based covariate adjustment. Our results indicate that constrained randomization improves the power of the linearization F-test, the KC-corrected GEE t-test (Kauermann and Carroll, 2001, Journal of the American Statistical Association 96, 1387-1396), and two permutation tests when the prognostic group-level variables are controlled for in the analysis and the size of randomization space is reasonably small. We also demonstrate that constrained randomization reduces power loss from redundant analysis-based adjustment for non-prognostic covariates. Design considerations such as the choice of the balance metric and the size of randomization space are discussed.
群组随机试验是将完整的个体组分配到不同比较组的随机研究。采用此类研究设计的一个常见实际限制是,可用的组数量有限,因此,简单随机化无法充分平衡各比较组之间的多个组水平协变量。因此,提出了基于协变量的受限随机化作为一种实现平衡的分配技术。受限随机化包括生成大量可能的分配方案,计算评估协变量不平衡的平衡分数,将随机化空间限制为候选分配的预先指定百分比,并随机选择一个方案来实施。当结果为二元变量时,关于此类设计在进行推断时的潜在优势会出现一些统计问题。特别是,对于连续结果所发现的性质可能并不直接适用,并且统计检验还有其他变体。受最近两项试验的启发,我们进行了一系列蒙特卡罗模拟,以评估在简单和受限随机化设计下,基于模型和基于随机化的检验的统计性质,同时进行不同程度的基于分析的协变量调整。我们的结果表明,当在分析中控制了预后组水平变量且随机化空间大小合理较小时,受限随机化提高了线性化F检验、KC校正的广义估计方程t检验(考曼和卡罗尔,2001年,《美国统计协会杂志》96卷, 1387 - 1396页)以及两种置换检验的功效。我们还证明,受限随机化减少了因对非预后协变量进行多余的基于分析的调整而导致的功效损失。文中讨论了诸如平衡度量的选择和随机化空间大小等设计考虑因素。