• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于自然驾驶数据的实时驾驶风险状态预测的综合方法。

An integrated methodology for real-time driving risk status prediction using naturalistic driving data.

机构信息

The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering, Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai, 201804, China; College of Transportation Engineering, Tongji University, 4800 Cao'an Highway, Shanghai, 201804, China.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jun;156:106122. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106122. Epub 2021 Apr 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2021.106122
PMID:33901716
Abstract

Real-time driving risk status prediction is critical for developing proactive traffic intervention strategies and enhance driving safety. However, the optimal observation time window length and prediction time window length, which should be the prerequisite for the timeliness and accuracy of real-time driving risk status prediction model, have been rarely explored in previous studies. In this study, a methodology which integrates driving risk status identification, rolling time window-based feature extraction, real-time driving risk status prediction and driving risk influencing factors analysis was proposed to accurately evaluate and predict real-time driving risk status. The methodology was tested based on 1,440 car-following events from Shanghai Naturalistic Driving Study. Results show that four driving risk statuses (safe, low-risk, median-risk and high-risk) are most appropriate to establish risk labelling criteria. In addition, results from driving risk status prediction show that when the observation time window length is 0.5 s, the accuracy rate of predicting medium-risk or high-risk status occurring in the next 0.7 s is higher than 85 % using multi-layer perceptron model. Meanwhile, the results from the analysis of influencing factors show that the input variables related to the risk status score higher in the ranking of feature importance. A part from that, speed difference, headway distance, speed and acceleration are still important in predicting driving risk status. The proposed methods in this paper can be applied in connected and autonomous vehicle (CAV) to reduce driver cognitive workload and hence improve driving safety fed with naturalistic driving data collected using in-vehicle systems.

摘要

实时驾驶风险状态预测对于开发主动交通干预策略和提高驾驶安全性至关重要。然而,在以前的研究中,很少探讨过实时驾驶风险状态预测模型的及时性和准确性的前提条件,即最佳观察时间窗口长度和预测时间窗口长度。在本研究中,提出了一种集成驾驶风险状态识别、滚动时间窗特征提取、实时驾驶风险状态预测和驾驶风险影响因素分析的方法,以准确评估和预测实时驾驶风险状态。该方法基于上海自然驾驶研究中的 1440 个跟驰事件进行了测试。结果表明,四种驾驶风险状态(安全、低风险、中风险和高风险)最适合建立风险标签标准。此外,驾驶风险状态预测的结果表明,当观察时间窗口长度为 0.5s 时,使用多层感知机模型预测下一个 0.7s 内发生中风险或高风险状态的准确率高于 85%。同时,影响因素分析的结果表明,与风险状态评分相关的输入变量在特征重要性排名中得分较高。除了这些,速度差、车头间距、速度和加速度在预测驾驶风险状态方面仍然很重要。本文提出的方法可以应用于联网和自动驾驶汽车中,通过使用车载系统采集的自然驾驶数据,减少驾驶员的认知工作量,从而提高驾驶安全性。

相似文献

1
An integrated methodology for real-time driving risk status prediction using naturalistic driving data.基于自然驾驶数据的实时驾驶风险状态预测的综合方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jun;156:106122. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106122. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
2
A dynamic method to predict driving risk on sharp curves using multi-source data.一种使用多源数据预测弯道驾驶风险的动态方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Oct;191:107228. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107228. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
3
A proactive lane-changing risk prediction framework considering driving intention recognition and different lane-changing patterns.考虑驾驶意图识别和不同变道模式的主动变道风险预测框架。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Jan;164:106500. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106500. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
4
Driving risk assessment using driving behavior data under continuous tunnel environment.基于连续隧道环境下驾驶行为数据的驾驶风险评估。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(8):807-812. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1675154. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
5
Driver Behavior During Overtaking Maneuvers from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.来自100辆汽车自然驾驶研究的超车操作过程中的驾驶员行为。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S176-81. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1057281.
6
Class-imbalanced crash prediction based on real-time traffic and weather data: A driving simulator study.基于实时交通和天气数据的不平衡碰撞预测:驾驶模拟器研究。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2020;21(3):201-208. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1723794. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
7
Quantifying visual road environment to establish a speeding prediction model: An examination using naturalistic driving data.量化视觉道路环境以建立超速预测模型:使用自然驾驶数据的检验。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Aug;129:289-298. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
8
Real-Time Driving Behavior Identification Based on Multi-Source Data Fusion.基于多源数据融合的实时驾驶行为识别。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 29;19(1):348. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010348.
9
Fleet analysis of headway distance for autonomous driving.自动驾驶中车头时距的车队分析。
J Safety Res. 2017 Dec;63:145-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.10.009. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
10
Existence of connected and autonomous vehicles in mixed traffic: Impacts on safety and environment.混合交通中互联和自动驾驶车辆的存在:对安全和环境的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2024;25(3):390-399. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2023.2291337. Epub 2024 Jan 2.

引用本文的文献

1
A Short-Term Risk Prediction Method Based on In-Vehicle Perception Data.一种基于车载感知数据的短期风险预测方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2025 May 20;25(10):3213. doi: 10.3390/s25103213.
2
Design and Implementation of a Two-Wheeled Vehicle Safe Driving Evaluation System.两轮车辆安全驾驶评估系统的设计与实现
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jul 22;24(14):4739. doi: 10.3390/s24144739.
3
Optimal Duration of In-Vehicle Data Recorder Monitoring to Assess Bus Driver Behavior.评估公交车驾驶员行为的车载数据记录仪监测最佳持续时间。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Nov 1;23(21):8887. doi: 10.3390/s23218887.
4
Motor-cognitive functions required for driving in post-stroke individuals identified via machine-learning analysis.通过机器学习分析确定的脑卒中患者驾驶所需的运动认知功能。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023 Oct 18;20(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01263-z.
5
Vehicle Driving Risk Prediction Model by Reverse Artificial Intelligence Neural Network.基于反向人工智能神经网络的车辆驾驶风险预测模型。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Oct 7;2022:3100509. doi: 10.1155/2022/3100509. eCollection 2022.
6
Data-Driven Estimation of a Driving Safety Tolerance Zone Using Imbalanced Machine Learning.基于不平衡机器学习的数据驱动驾驶安全容忍区估计。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jul 15;22(14):5309. doi: 10.3390/s22145309.
7
Real-Time Driving Behavior Identification Based on Multi-Source Data Fusion.基于多源数据融合的实时驾驶行为识别。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 29;19(1):348. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010348.