• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种基于车载感知数据的短期风险预测方法。

A Short-Term Risk Prediction Method Based on In-Vehicle Perception Data.

作者信息

Yao Xinpeng, Lyu Nengchao, Liu Mengfei

机构信息

Shandong Hi-Speed Group Innovation Research Institute, Jinan 250014, China.

Intelligent Transportation Systems Research Center, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2025 May 20;25(10):3213. doi: 10.3390/s25103213.

DOI:10.3390/s25103213
PMID:40432006
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12115600/
Abstract

Advanced driving assistance systems (ADASs) provide rich data on vehicles and their surroundings, enabling early detection and warning of driving risks. This study proposes a short-term risk prediction method based on in-vehicle perception data, aiming to support real-time risk identification in ADAS environments. A variable sliding window approach is employed to determine the optimal prediction window lead length and duration. The method incorporates Monte Carlo simulation for threshold calibration, Boruta-based feature selection, and multiple machine learning models, including the light gradient-boosting machine (LGBM), with performance interpretation via SHAP analysis. Validation is conducted using data from 90 real-world driving sessions. Results show that the optimal prediction lead time and window length are 1.6 s and 1.2 s, respectively, with LGBM achieving the best predictive performance. Risk prediction effectiveness is enhanced when integrating information across the human-vehicle-road environment system. Key features influencing prediction include vehicle speed, accelerator operation, braking deceleration, and the reciprocal of time to collision (TTCi). The proposed approach provides an effective solution for short-term risk prediction and offers algorithmic support for future ADAS applications.

摘要

先进驾驶辅助系统(ADAS)可提供有关车辆及其周围环境的丰富数据,从而实现对驾驶风险的早期检测和预警。本研究提出了一种基于车载感知数据的短期风险预测方法,旨在支持ADAS环境下的实时风险识别。采用可变滑动窗口方法来确定最佳预测窗口提前长度和持续时间。该方法结合了用于阈值校准的蒙特卡罗模拟、基于Boruta的特征选择以及包括轻梯度提升机(LGBM)在内的多种机器学习模型,并通过SHAP分析进行性能解释。使用来自90次实际驾驶会话的数据进行验证。结果表明,最佳预测提前时间和窗口长度分别为1.6秒和1.2秒,LGBM实现了最佳预测性能。整合人车路环境系统中的信息可提高风险预测有效性。影响预测的关键特征包括车速、油门操作、制动减速度以及碰撞时间倒数(TTCi)。所提出的方法为短期风险预测提供了有效解决方案,并为未来ADAS应用提供了算法支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d28/12115600/ddaceb6e1b47/sensors-25-03213-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d28/12115600/35be0082e81a/sensors-25-03213-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d28/12115600/96c700cb6405/sensors-25-03213-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d28/12115600/188b7366f26e/sensors-25-03213-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d28/12115600/91070522413a/sensors-25-03213-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d28/12115600/8ee113184a32/sensors-25-03213-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d28/12115600/1d4a0488beec/sensors-25-03213-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d28/12115600/ddaceb6e1b47/sensors-25-03213-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d28/12115600/35be0082e81a/sensors-25-03213-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d28/12115600/96c700cb6405/sensors-25-03213-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d28/12115600/188b7366f26e/sensors-25-03213-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d28/12115600/91070522413a/sensors-25-03213-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d28/12115600/8ee113184a32/sensors-25-03213-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d28/12115600/1d4a0488beec/sensors-25-03213-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d28/12115600/ddaceb6e1b47/sensors-25-03213-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
A Short-Term Risk Prediction Method Based on In-Vehicle Perception Data.一种基于车载感知数据的短期风险预测方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2025 May 20;25(10):3213. doi: 10.3390/s25103213.
2
A proactive lane-changing risk prediction framework considering driving intention recognition and different lane-changing patterns.考虑驾驶意图识别和不同变道模式的主动变道风险预测框架。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Jan;164:106500. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106500. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
3
Interpretable noninvasive diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion using LGBM and SHAP: development and clinical application of a machine learning model.使用LightGBM和SHAP对结核性胸腔积液进行可解释的无创诊断:机器学习模型的开发与临床应用
PeerJ. 2025 May 20;13:e19411. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19411. eCollection 2025.
4
Characteristics of automatic emergency braking responses in passenger vehicles evaluated in the IIHS front crash prevention program.在IIHS前碰撞预防计划中评估的乘用车自动紧急制动反应的特征。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Sep;190:107150. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107150. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
5
Does connected environment contribute to the driving safety and traffic efficiency improvement in emergency events?连通环境是否有助于提高紧急事件中的驾驶安全和交通效率?
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Dec;208:107810. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107810. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
6
A deep transfer learning approach for Real-Time traffic conflict prediction with trajectory data.一种基于轨迹数据的实时交通冲突预测深度迁移学习方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2025 May;214:107966. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2025.107966. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
7
Local Linear Wavelet Neural Network-Based Unscented Kalman Filter for Vehicle Collision Estimate Warning System and Ensuring Stable Vehicle-to-Infrastructure Communication.基于局部线性小波神经网络的无迹卡尔曼滤波器用于车辆碰撞估计预警系统及确保车辆与基础设施之间的稳定通信。
Appl Bionics Biomech. 2024 Dec 22;2024:2451501. doi: 10.1155/abb/2451501. eCollection 2024.
8
In-depth analysis of crash contributing factors and potential ADAS interventions among at-risk drivers using the SHRP 2 naturalistic driving study.利用SHRP 2自然驾驶研究对高危驾驶员中碰撞致因因素及潜在的高级驾驶辅助系统干预措施进行深入分析。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(sup1):S68-S73. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2021.1979529. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
9
Field effectiveness evaluation of advanced driver assistance systems.先进驾驶辅助系统的实地有效性评估
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018;19(sup2):S91-S95. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1527030. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
10
A proactive crash risk prediction framework for lane-changing behavior incorporating individual driving styles.主动式换道行为碰撞风险预测框架,纳入个体驾驶风格。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Aug;188:107072. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107072. Epub 2023 May 1.

本文引用的文献

1
High-risk event prone driver identification considering driving behavior temporal covariate shift.考虑驾驶行为时间协变量偏移的高风险事件倾向驾驶员识别。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 May;199:107526. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107526. Epub 2024 Mar 2.
2
Causation analysis of crashes and near crashes using naturalistic driving data.基于自然驾驶数据的事故与险肇事故致因分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Nov;177:106821. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106821. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
3
A study of freeway crash risk prediction and interpretation based on risky driving behavior and traffic flow data.
基于驾驶行为风险和交通流数据的高速公路事故风险预测与解释研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Sep;160:106328. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106328. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
4
An integrated methodology for real-time driving risk status prediction using naturalistic driving data.基于自然驾驶数据的实时驾驶风险状态预测的综合方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jun;156:106122. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106122. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
5
Real-time crash risk prediction on arterials based on LSTM-CNN.基于 LSTM-CNN 的干线道路实时碰撞风险预测
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Feb;135:105371. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.105371. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
6
Analysis of cut-in behavior based on naturalistic driving data.基于自然驾驶数据的切入行为分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Mar;124:127-137. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
7
Safety analytics for integrating crash frequency and real-time risk modeling for expressways.用于整合高速公路碰撞频率和实时风险建模的安全分析
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Jul;104:58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.04.009. Epub 2017 May 6.
8
A tree-structured crash surrogate measure for freeways.一种高速公路树状事故替代度量指标。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Apr;77:137-48. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.02.007. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
9
In-depth analysis of drivers' merging behavior and rear-end crash risks in work zone merging areas.深入分析工作区合流区驾驶员合流行为与追尾碰撞风险。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Apr;77:51-61. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Feb 14.
10
Individual driver risk assessment using naturalistic driving data.利用自然驾驶数据进行驾驶员个体风险评估。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Dec;61:3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.06.014. Epub 2012 Jul 9.