University Hospital Cologne, Heart Centre, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cologne, Germany; University Hospital Cologne, Heart Centre, ECMO Centre Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
University Hospital Cologne, Heart Centre, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cologne, Germany; University Hospital Cologne, Heart Centre, ECMO Centre Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Heart Lung Circ. 2021 Oct;30(10):1533-1539. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2021.03.276. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
Simultaneous mechanical circulatory support (MCS) with intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is common in postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCS). This study aimed to analyse the effect of concomitant ECMO and IABP therapy on the short-term outcomes of patients with PCS.
Between March 2006 and March 2017, 172 consecutive patients with central (c) or peripheral (p) veno-arterial ECMO therapy due to PCS were identified at the current institution and included in this retrospective analysis. Patients were divided into ECMO+IABP and ECMO alone groups. Further, the impact of ECMO flow direction was analysed for the groups.
A total of 129 patients received ECMO+IABP support and 43 patients were treated with ECMO alone. Median ECMO duration did not differ between the groups (68 [34; 95] hours ECMO+IABP vs 44 [20; 103] hours ECMO; p=0.151). However, a trend toward a higher weaning rate was evident in ECMO+IABP patients (75 [58%] ECMO+IABP vs 18 [42%] ECMO; p=0.078). Concomitant IABP support with either cECMO (73% [n=24] cECMO+IABP vs 50% [n=11] ECMO; p=0.098) or pECMO (57% [n=55] ECMO+IABP vs 33% [n=7] ECMO; p=0.056) was also associated with a trend toward a higher weaning rate off ECMO. In-hospital mortality did not differ between the groups.
This analysis found that, independent of ECMO type, additional IABP support might increase ECMO weaning; however, it did not influence survival in PCS patients. Larger studies are necessary to further analyse the impact of this concomitant MSC therapy on clinical outcomes.
主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)与体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)同时用于心脏手术后心源性休克(PCS)患者中较为常见。本研究旨在分析同时行 ECMO 和 IABP 治疗对 PCS 患者短期预后的影响。
2006 年 3 月至 2017 年 3 月,本中心连续收治 172 例因 PCS 行中心(c)或外周(p)静脉-动脉 ECMO 治疗的患者,并对这些患者进行回顾性分析。患者被分为 ECMO+IABP 组和 ECMO 组。进一步分析 ECMO 血流方向对两组的影响。
共 129 例患者接受 ECMO+IABP 支持,43 例患者仅接受 ECMO 治疗。两组 ECMO 持续时间中位数无差异(ECMO+IABP 组 68 [34;95] 小时 vs ECMO 组 44 [20;103] 小时;p=0.151)。然而,ECMO+IABP 患者的撤机率有升高趋势(ECMO+IABP 组 75 [58%] 例 vs ECMO 组 18 [42%] 例;p=0.078)。cECMO 联合 IABP 支持(73%[n=24]cECMO+IABP 组 vs 50%[n=11]ECMO 组;p=0.098)或 pECMO 联合 IABP 支持(57%[n=55]ECMO+IABP 组 vs 33%[n=7]ECMO 组;p=0.056)也与 ECMO 脱机率升高趋势相关。两组患者住院死亡率无差异。
本分析发现,无论 ECMO 类型如何,附加的 IABP 支持可能增加 ECMO 撤机;然而,它并没有影响 PCS 患者的生存。需要更大的研究来进一步分析这种同时行机械循环支持治疗对临床结局的影响。