Dpeartment of Neurology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
Neurology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;92(10):1062-1067. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2021-326166. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
A subset of ischaemic stroke patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have ischaemic stroke despite anticoagulation. We sought to determine the association between prestroke anticoagulant therapy and recurrent ischaemic events and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH).
We included consecutive patients with acute ischaemic stroke and AF from the Initiation of Anticoagulation after Cardioembolic stroke (IAC) study from eight comprehensive stroke centres in the USA. We compared recurrent ischaemic events and delayed sICH risk using adjusted Cox regression analyses between patients who were prescribed anticoagulation (ACp) versus patients who were naïve to anticoagulation therapy prior to the ischaemic stroke (anticoagulation naïve).
Among 2084 patients in IAC, 1518 had prior anticoagulation status recorded and were followed for 90 days. In adjusted Cox hazard models, ACp was associated with some evidence of a higher risk higher risk of 90-day recurrent ischaemic events only in the fully adjusted model (adjusted HR 1.50, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.28, p=0.058) but not increased risk of 90-day sICH (adjusted HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.46 to 2.51, p=0.862). In addition, switching anticoagulation class was not associated with reduced risk of recurrent ischaemic events (adjusted HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.12 to 1.33, p=0.136) nor sICH (adjusted HR 1.47, 95% CI 0.29 to 7.50, p=0.641).
AF patients with ischaemic stroke despite anticoagulation may have higher recurrent ischaemic event risk compared with anticoagulation-naïve patients. This suggests differing underlying pathomechanisms requiring different stroke prevention measures and identifying these mechanisms may improve secondary prevention strategies.
尽管进行了抗凝治疗,仍有一部分伴有心房颤动(AF)的缺血性脑卒中患者发生了缺血性脑卒中。我们旨在确定缺血性脑卒中前抗凝治疗与复发性缺血事件和症状性颅内出血(sICH)之间的相关性。
我们纳入了来自美国 8 个综合卒中中心的 Initiation of Anticoagulation after Cardioembolic stroke(IAC)研究中连续的急性缺血性脑卒中合并 AF 患者。我们比较了在缺血性脑卒中前接受抗凝治疗的患者(ACp)与未接受抗凝治疗的患者(抗凝治疗初治)之间复发性缺血事件和延迟性 sICH 风险,采用校正后的 Cox 回归分析。
在 IAC 研究的 2084 例患者中,有 1518 例患者记录了既往抗凝状态,随访 90 天。在调整后的 Cox 风险模型中,ACp 与 90 天内复发性缺血事件风险增加有关,但仅在完全调整模型中具有一定证据(调整后的 HR 1.50,95%CI 0.99 至 2.28,p=0.058),而与 90 天内 sICH 风险增加无关(调整后的 HR 1.08,95%CI 0.46 至 2.51,p=0.862)。此外,转换抗凝药物种类与复发性缺血事件风险降低无关(调整后的 HR 0.41,95%CI 0.12 至 1.33,p=0.136),也与 sICH 无关(调整后的 HR 1.47,95%CI 0.29 至 7.50,p=0.641)。
与抗凝治疗初治患者相比,尽管进行了抗凝治疗,仍有一部分缺血性脑卒中合并 AF 的患者复发性缺血事件风险更高。这表明存在不同的潜在发病机制,需要采取不同的卒中预防措施,识别这些机制可能会改善二级预防策略。