Department of Respiratory Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Integrated Frontier Research for Medical Science Division, Institute for Open and Transdisciplinary Research Initiatives, Osaka University, Suita, Japan.
Rheumatol Int. 2021 Jul;41(7):1233-1241. doi: 10.1007/s00296-021-04862-y. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
We aimed to investigate the efficacy of anti-IL-6 receptor antibody (aIL-6) and other biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), such as TNF inhibitor and CTLA4-Ig in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients with knee joint involvement.
We retrospectively analyzed 1059 treatment courses of patients with RA who visited our hospitals and were treated with bDMARDs. We categorized them into two groups, with or without knee joint involvement. We investigated the clinical disease activity index (CDAI) at baseline and 12 weeks after the initiation of bDMARDs. We compared the improvement of the markers between aIL-6 and other bDMARDs.
Treatment with aIL-6 significantly increased ΔCDAI (n = 91, 15.4 ± 1.1; mean ± SEM) in patients with knee joint involvement, compared to other bDMARDs (n = 232, 11.0 ± 0.7) at 12 weeks (P = 0.006). Following the multivariate analysis adjusted by the CDAI levels at baseline, age, gender, concomitant use of methotrexate, and the first use of bDMARDs, ΔCDAI levels were significantly higher in aIL-6, compared to other bDMARDs (P = 0.02). However, there was no significant difference in ΔCDAI improvement between aIL-6 (n = 162, 5.9 ± 0.6) and other bDMARDs (n = 573, 6.2 ± 0.4) in patients without swollen knee joints. ΔCDAI levels were equally increased in patients with shoulder and elbow joint involvement.
aIL-6 was more effective in the patients with RA and knee joint involvement, compared to other bDMARDs.
我们旨在探究抗白细胞介素 6 受体抗体(aIL-6)和其他生物改善病情抗风湿药(bDMARDs),如 TNF 抑制剂和 CTLA4-Ig 在膝关节受累的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者中的疗效。
我们回顾性分析了 1059 例就诊于我院并接受 bDMARDs 治疗的 RA 患者的 1059 个疗程。我们将他们分为两组,即膝关节受累组和无膝关节受累组。我们在开始 bDMARDs 治疗前和 12 周后分别调查了临床疾病活动指数(CDAI)。我们比较了 aIL-6 和其他 bDMARDs 对标志物的改善效果。
与其他 bDMARDs(n = 232,11.0 ± 0.7)相比,在膝关节受累的患者中,使用 aIL-6 治疗在 12 周时显著增加了 ΔCDAI(n = 91,15.4 ± 1.1;均数 ± SEM)(P = 0.006)。经过基线 CDAI 水平、年龄、性别、甲氨蝶呤联合使用和首次使用 bDMARDs 的多变量分析调整后,与其他 bDMARDs 相比,aIL-6 的 ΔCDAI 水平显著更高(P = 0.02)。然而,在无膝关节肿胀的患者中,aIL-6(n = 162,5.9 ± 0.6)和其他 bDMARDs(n = 573,6.2 ± 0.4)的 ΔCDAI 改善无显著差异。在肩和肘关节受累的患者中,ΔCDAI 水平同样增加。
与其他 bDMARDs 相比,aIL-6 在膝关节受累的 RA 患者中更有效。