Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, USA.
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2021 Jul-Sep;69(3):383-410. doi: 10.1080/00207144.2021.1910827. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
Three experiments studied recognition during posthypnotic amnesia (PHA) employing confidence ratings rather than the traditional yes/no format. As the criterion for recognition was loosened, an increase in hits was accompanied by an increase in false alarms, especially to distractor items that were conceptually related to, or semantically associated with, targets. Nevertheless, hits exceeded false alarms at every level of confidence. In addition, amnesic subjects had difficulty identifying the particular list on which recognized items were presented for study or the correct order in which targets appeared on the study list. Taken together, these findings support the conclusion that successful recognition during PHA is more likely to be mediated by a priming-based feeling familiarity than conscious recollection.
三项实验采用置信度评级而非传统的“是/否”格式研究催眠后失忆(PHA)期间的识别。随着识别标准放宽,击中率的增加伴随着虚报率的增加,特别是对于在概念上或语义上与目标相关的分心项目。然而,在每个置信度水平上,击中率都超过了虚报率。此外,健忘症患者难以识别出识别项目呈现学习的特定列表,或目标在学习列表中出现的正确顺序。综上所述,这些发现支持这样的结论,即在 PHA 期间成功的识别更可能是由基于启动的感觉熟悉度而不是有意识的回忆介导的。