Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗老年直肠癌患者的结局比较。

Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery in Elderly Patients with Rectal Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, China.

出版信息

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021 Apr 1;22(4):1325-1329. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.4.1325.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic colorectal resection has been gaining popularity over the past two decades-and the number of elderly patients with colorectal cancer treated with a surgical modality has gradually increased. However, studies about laparoscopic rectal surgery in elderly patients with long-term oncologic outcomes are limited. In this study, we evaluated the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic resection in patients with rectal cancer aged ≥80 y.

METHODS

From 2007-2015, a total of 84 consecutive patients with rectal cancer from a single institution were included, 45 patients undergoing laparoscopic rectal resection were compared with 39 patients undergoing open rectal resection.

RESULTS

The two groups were well balanced in terms of age, gender, body mass index, American society of anesthesiologists scores, previous abdominal surgery, neoadjuvant therapy, tumor stage, distance of tumor from the anal verge, and comorbidities. One (2.2%) patient in the laparoscopic group required conversion to open surgery. Laparoscopic surgery was associated with significantly longer operating time (160.1±28.2 versus 148.2±41.3 min; P=0.031), less intraoperative blood loss (80.5±20.9 versus 160.3±42.4 mL; P=0.002), less need of blood transfusion (6.7% versus 20.5%; P=0.003), a shorter time to diet recovery (2.5±1.5 versus 4.9±1.1; P=0.015) and postoperative hospital stay (7.5±4.5 versus 10.8±4.2; P=0.035), lower overall postoperative complication rate (8.9% versus 20.5%; P=0.017), and wound-related complication rate (4.4% versus 10.2%; P=0.013) when compared with open surgery. Specimen length, no. of retrieced lymph nodes, positive distal and circumferential margin rate, mortality rate, and reoperation rate were not significantly different between two groups. The disease-free and overall 5-year survival rates were similar between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic rectal surgery is safe and feasible in patients aged≥80 y and is associated with similar long-term oncologic outcomes when compared with open surgery. 
.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜结直肠切除术在过去二十年中越来越受欢迎,接受手术治疗的老年结直肠癌患者数量逐渐增加。然而,关于老年患者腹腔镜直肠手术的长期肿瘤学结果的研究有限。在这项研究中,我们评估了腹腔镜直肠切除术治疗≥ 80 岁直肠癌患者的安全性和有效性。

方法

2007 年至 2015 年,来自单一机构的 84 例连续直肠癌患者被纳入研究,其中 45 例行腹腔镜直肠切除术,39 例行开放直肠切除术。

结果

两组患者在年龄、性别、体重指数、美国麻醉医师协会评分、既往腹部手术、新辅助治疗、肿瘤分期、肿瘤距肛缘的距离以及合并症方面均具有良好的均衡性。腹腔镜组有 1 例(2.2%)患者需要转为开腹手术。腹腔镜手术与显著更长的手术时间(160.1 ± 28.2 与 148.2 ± 41.3 分钟;P = 0.031)、术中出血量更少(80.5 ± 20.9 与 160.3 ± 42.4 毫升;P = 0.002)、输血需求更少(6.7%与 20.5%;P = 0.003)、饮食恢复时间更短(2.5 ± 1.5 与 4.9 ± 1.1 分钟;P = 0.015)和术后住院时间更短(7.5 ± 4.5 与 10.8 ± 4.2 天;P = 0.035)、总体术后并发症发生率更低(8.9%与 20.5%;P = 0.017)和切口相关并发症发生率更低(4.4%与 10.2%;P = 0.013)。两组之间标本长度、检索淋巴结数量、远端和环周切缘阳性率、死亡率和再次手术率无显著差异。两组患者无病生存率和总生存率相似。

结论

腹腔镜直肠手术在≥ 80 岁的患者中是安全可行的,与开放手术相比,其长期肿瘤学结果相似。

相似文献

8
Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopy in rectal cancer.腹腔镜治疗直肠癌的成本效益分析。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 May;57(5):564-9. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182a73244.

本文引用的文献

1
Current status of surgical treatment of rectal cancer in China.中国直肠癌外科治疗现状。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2020 Nov 20;133(22):2703-2711. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001076.
2
Treatment of Elderly Patients with Colorectal Cancer.老年结直肠癌患者的治疗。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Mar 11;2018:2176056. doi: 10.1155/2018/2176056. eCollection 2018.
9
Current status of rectal cancer treatment in China.中国直肠癌治疗的现状。
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Nov;15(11):1345-50. doi: 10.1111/codi.12269.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验