Nomura Kazunori, Yoshida Munehito, Okada Motohiro, Nakamura Yosuke, Yawatari Kenichi, Nakayama Enshi
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, 88463Sumiya Orthopaedic Hospital, Wakayama-shi, Wakayama, Japan.
Global Spine J. 2023 Apr;13(3):764-770. doi: 10.1177/21925682211008835. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
Retrospective cohort study.
To investigate the effectiveness and safety of a gelatin-thrombin matrix sealant (GTMS) during microendoscopic laminectomy (MEL) for lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS).
This study included 158 LSCS cases on hemostasis-affecting medication who underwent MEL by a single surgeon between September 2016 and August 2020. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on whether GTMS was used (37 cases, Group A) or not (121 cases, Group B). Perioperative data related to bleeding or postoperative spinal epidural hematoma (PSEH) was investigated. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score for low back pain.
The mean intraoperative blood loss per level was greater in Group A (26.0 ± 20.3 g) than in Group B (13.6 ± 9.0 g), whereas the postoperative drainage volume was smaller in Group A (79.1 ± 42.5 g) than in Group B (97.3 ± 55.6 g). No revision surgeries for PSEH were required in Group A, while 2 (1.7%) revisions were required in Group B ( = .957). The median JOA score improved significantly from the preoperative period to 1-year postoperatively in both Group A and B (total score, 16.0-23.5 and 17.0-25.0 points, respectively).
The use of GTMS during MEL for LSCS may be associated with a reduction in postoperative drainage volume. The revision rate for PSEH was not affected significantly by the use of GTMS. Clinical outcomes (represented by the JOA score) were significantly improved after the surgery, regardless of GTMS use during MEL.
回顾性队列研究。
探讨明胶 - 凝血酶基质密封剂(GTMS)在腰椎管狭窄症(LSCS)的显微内镜下椎板切除术(MEL)中的有效性和安全性。
本研究纳入了2016年9月至2020年8月期间由同一位外科医生进行MEL手术且正在服用影响止血药物的158例LSCS患者。根据是否使用GTMS将患者分为两组(A组37例,B组121例)。调查围手术期与出血或术后脊髓硬膜外血肿(PSEH)相关的数据。使用日本骨科协会(JOA)下腰痛评分评估临床结局。
A组每节段平均术中失血量(26.0±20.3克)高于B组(13.6±9.0克),而A组术后引流量(79.1±42.5克)低于B组(97.3±55.6克)。A组无需因PSEH进行翻修手术,而B组有2例(1.7%)需要翻修(P = 0.957)。A组和B组的JOA评分中位数从术前到术后1年均显著改善(总分分别为16.0 - 23.5分和17.0 - 25.0分)。
在LSCS的MEL手术中使用GTMS可能与术后引流量减少有关。GTMS的使用对PSEH的翻修率无显著影响。无论MEL手术中是否使用GTMS,术后临床结局(以JOA评分表示)均有显著改善。