Center for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.
mBio. 2021 Apr 27;12(2):e00466-21. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00466-21.
Predation structures food webs, influences energy flow, and alters rates and pathways of nutrient cycling through ecosystems, effects that are well documented for macroscopic predators. In the microbial world, predatory bacteria are common, yet little is known about their rates of growth and roles in energy flows through microbial food webs, in part because these are difficult to quantify. Here, we show that growth and carbon uptake were higher in predatory bacteria compared to nonpredatory bacteria, a finding across 15 sites, synthesizing 82 experiments and over 100,000 taxon-specific measurements of element flow into newly synthesized bacterial DNA. Obligate predatory bacteria grew 36% faster and assimilated carbon at rates 211% higher than nonpredatory bacteria. These differences were less pronounced for facultative predators (6% higher growth rates, 17% higher carbon assimilation rates), though high growth and carbon assimilation rates were observed for some facultative predators, such as members of the genera and , both capable of gliding motility and wolf-pack hunting behavior. Added carbon substrates disproportionately stimulated growth of obligate predators, with responses 63% higher than those of nonpredators for the and 81% higher for the , whereas responses of facultative predators to substrate addition were no different from those of nonpredators. This finding supports the ecological theory that higher productivity increases predator control of lower trophic levels. These findings also indicate that the functional significance of bacterial predators increases with energy flow and that predatory bacteria influence element flow through microbial food webs. The word "predator" may conjure images of leopards killing and eating impala on the African savannah or of great white sharks attacking elephant seals off the coast of California. But microorganisms are also predators, including bacteria that kill and eat other bacteria. While predatory bacteria have been found in many environments, it has been challenging to document their importance in nature. This study quantified the growth of predatory and nonpredatory bacteria in soils (and one stream) by tracking isotopically labeled substrates into newly synthesized DNA. Predatory bacteria were more active than nonpredators, and obligate predators, such as and , increased in growth rate in response to added substrates at the base of the food chain, strong evidence of trophic control. This work provides quantitative measures of predator activity and suggests that predatory bacteria-along with protists, nematodes, and phages-are active and important in microbial food webs.
捕食作用构建了食物网,影响能量流动,并改变了生态系统中养分循环的速率和途径,这些作用在宏观捕食者中已有充分的记录。在微生物世界中,捕食性细菌很常见,但人们对它们的生长速度及其在微生物食物网中能量流动中的作用知之甚少,部分原因是这些难以量化。在这里,我们表明与非捕食性细菌相比,捕食性细菌的生长和碳吸收更高,这一发现跨越了 15 个地点,综合了 82 项实验和超过 10 万个特定于分类群的元素流入新合成细菌 DNA 的测量结果。专性捕食细菌的生长速度快 36%,碳同化率高 211%。对于兼性捕食者,这些差异不那么明显(生长率高 6%,碳同化率高 17%),尽管一些兼性捕食者(如能够滑行运动和狼型狩猎行为的属成员)的高生长和高碳同化率。添加的碳底物不成比例地刺激了专性捕食者的生长,其反应比非捕食者高 63%,对于 ,反应高 81%,而对于兼性捕食者,对底物添加的反应与非捕食者没有不同。这一发现支持了更高生产力增加对较低营养水平的捕食控制的生态理论。这些发现还表明,细菌捕食者的功能重要性随着能量流动而增加,并且捕食性细菌通过微生物食物网影响元素流动。“捕食者”这个词可能会让人联想到在非洲大草原上豹子捕杀和吃掉黑斑羚,或者在加利福尼亚海岸外大白鲨攻击象海豹的情景。但是微生物也是捕食者,包括杀死和吃掉其他细菌的细菌。虽然已经在许多环境中发现了捕食性细菌,但要证明它们在自然界中的重要性一直具有挑战性。本研究通过追踪同位素标记的底物进入新合成的 DNA,量化了土壤(和一条溪流)中捕食性和非捕食性细菌的生长。与非捕食者相比,捕食性细菌更活跃,而专性捕食者(如 和 )则会随着食物链底部添加的底物而增加生长速度,这是营养控制的有力证据。这项工作提供了捕食者活性的定量测量,并表明捕食性细菌——与原生动物、线虫和噬菌体一起——在微生物食物网中是活跃和重要的。