Badreldin Hisham, Aloqayli Saud, Alqarni Reem, Alyahya Hayaa, Alshehri Abdulmajeed, Alzahrani Mohammed, Al Tawalbeh Amjad, Ismail Wesam W
Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutical Care Services, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Faculty of Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Ar-Ramtha, Jordan.
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2021 Apr 20;12:383-392. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S298645. eCollection 2021.
The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors has published clear guidelines on the authorship of scientific papers. It is the research team's responsibility to review and ensure those guidelines are met. Authorship ethics and practices have been examined among healthcare professionals or among particular health science students such as medical students. However, there is limited evidence to assess the knowledge of authorship roles and practices among health science students.
We conducted a cross-sectional study to assess the knowledge of authorship guidelines practices among health science students at King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. A survey was developed and distributed. It covered several domains, including demographic characteristics, participant's knowledge and attitude of authorship practices, knowledge and experience with ghost and guest authorships, and knowledge of institutional authorship policies. Moreover, a score was computed to reflect the respondents' knowledge about authorship practices.
Among the 321 participants who agreed to take the survey, two-thirds agreed with and supported that multi-authored articles' credit allocation should be based on the most significant contribution and contributions to the manuscript writing. Almost 47% agreed that team relationships would influence authorship allocation. The majority of the participants were not aware of their institutional research and publication policies. Also, around 50% of participants were not aware of guest or ghost authorships. Finally, the knowledge score about authorship credits, allocation, contribution, order, and guidelines was higher among students who were assigned as corresponding authors and those who were aware of their institutional authorship guidelines and policies.
In conclusion, our findings suggest that health science students may have limited knowledge about authorship guidelines and unethical behaviors involved in a scientific publication. Universities and research centers should make more efforts to raise the awareness of health science students regarding authorship guidelines while ensuring that they comply with those guidelines.
国际医学期刊编辑委员会已发布关于科学论文作者身份的明确指南。研究团队有责任审查并确保符合这些指南。已在医疗保健专业人员或特定健康科学专业学生(如医学生)中研究了作者身份伦理和实践。然而,评估健康科学专业学生对作者身份角色和实践的了解的证据有限。
我们进行了一项横断面研究,以评估沙特阿拉伯利雅得国王沙特·本·阿卜杜勒阿齐兹卫生科学大学健康科学专业学生对作者身份指南实践的了解。开发并分发了一项调查。它涵盖了几个领域,包括人口统计学特征、参与者对作者身份实践的知识和态度、对代笔和客座作者身份的知识和经验,以及对机构作者身份政策的了解。此外,计算了一个分数以反映受访者对作者身份实践的了解。
在同意参与调查的321名参与者中,三分之二同意并支持多作者文章的功劳分配应基于最重要的贡献和对稿件撰写的贡献。近47%的人同意团队关系会影响作者身份分配。大多数参与者不了解他们机构的研究和出版政策。此外,约50%的参与者不了解客座或代笔作者身份。最后,被指定为通讯作者的学生以及了解其机构作者身份指南和政策的学生在作者身份功劳、分配、贡献、顺序和指南方面的知识得分更高。
总之,我们的研究结果表明,健康科学专业学生对科学出版物中涉及的作者身份指南和不道德行为的了解可能有限。大学和研究中心应做出更多努力,提高健康科学专业学生对作者身份指南的认识,同时确保他们遵守这些指南。