• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The CARESSES Randomised Controlled Trial: Exploring the Health-Related Impact of Culturally Competent Artificial Intelligence Embedded Into Socially Assistive Robots and Tested in Older Adult Care Homes.CARESSES随机对照试验:探索嵌入社交辅助机器人并在老年护理院进行测试的具有文化能力的人工智能对健康的相关影响。
Int J Soc Robot. 2022;14(1):245-256. doi: 10.1007/s12369-021-00781-x. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
2
The CARESSES study protocol: testing and evaluating culturally competent socially assistive robots among older adults residing in long term care homes through a controlled experimental trial.关爱研究方案:通过对照试验,在长期护理机构的老年人中测试和评估具有文化能力的社交辅助机器人。
Arch Public Health. 2020 Mar 20;78:26. doi: 10.1186/s13690-020-00409-y. eCollection 2020.
3
Exploring the impact of socially assistive robots on health and wellbeing across the lifespan: An umbrella review and meta-analysis.探讨社交辅助机器人在整个生命周期中对健康和幸福的影响:伞式综述和荟萃分析。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 May;153:104730. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104730. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
4
Enablers and barriers to the implementation of socially assistive humanoid robots in health and social care: a systematic review.促进和阻碍社交辅助人形机器人在医疗和社会保健领域应用的因素:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 9;10(1):e033096. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033096.
5
Implementing Affordable Socially Assistive Pet Robots in Care Homes Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Stratified Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial and Mixed Methods Study.在新冠疫情之前及期间在养老院实施经济适用型社会辅助宠物机器人:分层整群随机对照试验和混合方法研究
JMIR Aging. 2022 Aug 24;5(3):e38864. doi: 10.2196/38864.
6
A qualitative exploration of care homes workers' views and training needs in relation to the use of socially assistive humanoid robots in their workplace.对养老院工作人员关于在其工作场所使用社交辅助类人机器人的看法和培训需求的定性探索。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2022 May;17(3):e12432. doi: 10.1111/opn.12432. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
7
Positive Emotional Responses to Socially Assistive Robots in People With Dementia: Pilot Study.《痴呆症患者对社交辅助机器人的积极情绪反应:初步研究》
JMIR Aging. 2024 Apr 11;7:e52443. doi: 10.2196/52443.
8
Changes in technology acceptance among older people with dementia: the role of social robot engagement.老年人认知障碍者技术接受度的变化:社交机器人参与的作用。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Sep;141:104241. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104241. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
9
A social robot intervention on depression, loneliness, and quality of life for Taiwanese older adults in long-term care.社会机器人干预对长期护理机构中台湾地区老年人的抑郁、孤独和生活质量的影响。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2020 Aug;32(8):981-991. doi: 10.1017/S1041610220000459. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
10
Nurses' perception towards care robots and their work experience with socially assistive technology during COVID-19: A qualitative study.护士对护理机器人的看法及其在 COVID-19 期间对社交辅助技术的工作经验:一项定性研究。
Geriatr Nurs. 2023 Mar-Apr;50:234-239. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2023.01.025. Epub 2023 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Designing for flourishing: a conceptual model for enhancing older adults' well-being with social robots.为蓬勃发展而设计:一个利用社交机器人提升老年人幸福感的概念模型。
Front Robot AI. 2025 Aug 20;12:1607373. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1607373. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluating Social Assistive Robots in Clinical Nursing Care: Mixed Method Pilot Study on Health Care Workers' Perceptions and Adoption.评估临床护理中的社交辅助机器人:关于医护人员认知与采用情况的混合方法试点研究
JMIR Nurs. 2025 Aug 1;8:e70305. doi: 10.2196/70305.
3
Digital bridges to social connection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of digital interventions for loneliness and social isolation.通往社交联系的数字桥梁:针对孤独和社会隔离的数字干预措施的系统评价与荟萃分析
Internet Interv. 2025 Jul 8;41:100856. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2025.100856. eCollection 2025 Sep.
4
Global output of clinical application research on artificial intelligence in the past decade: a scientometric study and science mapping.过去十年人工智能临床应用研究的全球产出:一项科学计量学研究与科学图谱分析
Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 15;14(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13643-025-02779-2.
5
AI Applications to Reduce Loneliness Among Older Adults: A Systematic Review of Effectiveness and Technologies.人工智能应用于减少老年人孤独感:有效性与技术的系统评价
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Feb 20;13(5):446. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13050446.
6
Artificially intelligent nursing homes: a scoping review of palliative care interventions.人工智能养老院:姑息治疗干预措施的范围综述
Front Digit Health. 2025 Feb 11;7:1484304. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1484304. eCollection 2025.
7
Efficacy of relational agents for loneliness across age groups: a systematic review and meta-analysis.关系型代理对各年龄段孤独感的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 6;24(1):1802. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19153-x.
8
Systematic review and meta-analysis of AI-based conversational agents for promoting mental health and well-being.基于人工智能的对话代理促进心理健康和幸福的系统评价与荟萃分析。
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Dec 19;6(1):236. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00979-5.
9
Community engagement and loneliness in older adults in China: mediation effects of social support in the wake of COVID-19.社区参与和中国老年人的孤独感:COVID-19 后社会支持的中介作用。
Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 1;11:1199577. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1199577. eCollection 2023.
10
Digital interventions to reduce social isolation and loneliness in older adults: An evidence and gap map.减少老年人社会隔离和孤独感的数字干预措施:证据与差距图谱
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;19(4):e1369. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1369. eCollection 2023 Dec.

CARESSES随机对照试验:探索嵌入社交辅助机器人并在老年护理院进行测试的具有文化能力的人工智能对健康的相关影响。

The CARESSES Randomised Controlled Trial: Exploring the Health-Related Impact of Culturally Competent Artificial Intelligence Embedded Into Socially Assistive Robots and Tested in Older Adult Care Homes.

作者信息

Papadopoulos Chris, Castro Nina, Nigath Abiha, Davidson Rosemary, Faulkes Nicholas, Menicatti Roberto, Khaliq Ali Abdul, Recchiuto Carmine, Battistuzzi Linda, Randhawa Gurch, Merton Len, Kanoria Sanjeev, Chong Nak-Young, Kamide Hiroko, Hewson David, Sgorbissa Antonio

机构信息

University of Bedfordshire, Park Square Campus, Luton, LU1 3JU UK.

Advinia Health Care Limited LTD, 314 Regents Park Road, London, N3 2JX UK.

出版信息

Int J Soc Robot. 2022;14(1):245-256. doi: 10.1007/s12369-021-00781-x. Epub 2021 Apr 23.

DOI:10.1007/s12369-021-00781-x
PMID:33907589
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8062829/
Abstract

This trial represents the final stage of the CARESSES project which aimed to develop and evaluate a culturally competent artificial intelligent system embedded into social robots to support older adult wellbeing. A parallel group, single-blind randomised controlled trial was conducted across older adult care homes in England and Japan. Participants randomly allocated to the Experimental Group or Control Group 1 received a Pepper robot for up 18 h across 2 weeks. Two versions of the CARESSES artificial intelligence were tested: a fully culturally competent system (Experimental Group) and a more limited version (Control Group 1). Control Group 2 (Care As Usual) participants did not receive a robot. Quantitative outcomes of interest reported in the current paper were health-related quality of life (SF-36), loneliness (ULS-8), and perceptions of robotic cultural competence (CCATool-Robotics). Thirty-three residents completed all procedures. The difference in SF-36 Emotional Wellbeing scores between Experimental Group and Care As Usual participants over time was significant (F[1] = 6.614, sig = .019, η  = .258), as was the comparison between Any Robot used and Care As Usual (F[1] = 5.128, sig = .031, η  = .146). There were no significant changes in SF-36 physical health subscales. ULS-8 loneliness scores slightly improved among Experimental and Control Group 1 participants compared to Care As Usual participants, but this was not significant. This study brings new evidence which cautiously supports the value of culturally competent socially assistive robots in improving the psychological wellbeing of older adults residing in care settings.

摘要

这项试验代表了CARESSES项目的最后阶段,该项目旨在开发并评估一个融入社交机器人的、具备文化能力的人工智能系统,以支持老年人的福祉。在英国和日本的老年护理院进行了一项平行组、单盲随机对照试验。随机分配到实验组或对照组1的参与者在两周内可使用佩珀机器人长达18小时。对CARESSES人工智能的两个版本进行了测试:一个完全具备文化能力的系统(实验组)和一个更有限的版本(对照组1)。对照组2(常规护理组)的参与者没有收到机器人。本文报告的感兴趣的定量结果包括健康相关生活质量(SF-36)、孤独感(ULS-8)以及对机器人文化能力的认知(CCATool-Robotics)。33名居民完成了所有程序。随着时间的推移,实验组与常规护理组参与者在SF-36情感幸福得分上的差异具有统计学意义(F[1]=6.614,sig=0.019,η=0.258),使用任何机器人组与常规护理组之间的比较也是如此(F[1]=5.128,sig=0.031,η=0.146)。SF-36身体健康子量表没有显著变化。与常规护理组参与者相比,实验组和对照组1参与者的ULS-8孤独得分略有改善,但不显著。这项研究提供了新证据,谨慎地支持了具备文化能力的社会辅助机器人在改善居住在护理机构中的老年人心理健康方面的价值。