Papadopoulos Chris, Castro Nina, Nigath Abiha, Davidson Rosemary, Faulkes Nicholas, Menicatti Roberto, Khaliq Ali Abdul, Recchiuto Carmine, Battistuzzi Linda, Randhawa Gurch, Merton Len, Kanoria Sanjeev, Chong Nak-Young, Kamide Hiroko, Hewson David, Sgorbissa Antonio
University of Bedfordshire, Park Square Campus, Luton, LU1 3JU UK.
Advinia Health Care Limited LTD, 314 Regents Park Road, London, N3 2JX UK.
Int J Soc Robot. 2022;14(1):245-256. doi: 10.1007/s12369-021-00781-x. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
This trial represents the final stage of the CARESSES project which aimed to develop and evaluate a culturally competent artificial intelligent system embedded into social robots to support older adult wellbeing. A parallel group, single-blind randomised controlled trial was conducted across older adult care homes in England and Japan. Participants randomly allocated to the Experimental Group or Control Group 1 received a Pepper robot for up 18 h across 2 weeks. Two versions of the CARESSES artificial intelligence were tested: a fully culturally competent system (Experimental Group) and a more limited version (Control Group 1). Control Group 2 (Care As Usual) participants did not receive a robot. Quantitative outcomes of interest reported in the current paper were health-related quality of life (SF-36), loneliness (ULS-8), and perceptions of robotic cultural competence (CCATool-Robotics). Thirty-three residents completed all procedures. The difference in SF-36 Emotional Wellbeing scores between Experimental Group and Care As Usual participants over time was significant (F[1] = 6.614, sig = .019, η = .258), as was the comparison between Any Robot used and Care As Usual (F[1] = 5.128, sig = .031, η = .146). There were no significant changes in SF-36 physical health subscales. ULS-8 loneliness scores slightly improved among Experimental and Control Group 1 participants compared to Care As Usual participants, but this was not significant. This study brings new evidence which cautiously supports the value of culturally competent socially assistive robots in improving the psychological wellbeing of older adults residing in care settings.
这项试验代表了CARESSES项目的最后阶段,该项目旨在开发并评估一个融入社交机器人的、具备文化能力的人工智能系统,以支持老年人的福祉。在英国和日本的老年护理院进行了一项平行组、单盲随机对照试验。随机分配到实验组或对照组1的参与者在两周内可使用佩珀机器人长达18小时。对CARESSES人工智能的两个版本进行了测试:一个完全具备文化能力的系统(实验组)和一个更有限的版本(对照组1)。对照组2(常规护理组)的参与者没有收到机器人。本文报告的感兴趣的定量结果包括健康相关生活质量(SF-36)、孤独感(ULS-8)以及对机器人文化能力的认知(CCATool-Robotics)。33名居民完成了所有程序。随着时间的推移,实验组与常规护理组参与者在SF-36情感幸福得分上的差异具有统计学意义(F[1]=6.614,sig=0.019,η=0.258),使用任何机器人组与常规护理组之间的比较也是如此(F[1]=5.128,sig=0.031,η=0.146)。SF-36身体健康子量表没有显著变化。与常规护理组参与者相比,实验组和对照组1参与者的ULS-8孤独得分略有改善,但不显著。这项研究提供了新证据,谨慎地支持了具备文化能力的社会辅助机器人在改善居住在护理机构中的老年人心理健康方面的价值。