Axt Steffen, Kirschniak Andreas, Axt Lena, Braun Manuel, Beltzer Christian, Leichtle Carmen, Leichtle Ulf
Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Tübingen University Hospital.
Department of Internal Medicine I, Reutlingen Hospital.
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2021 Apr 7;13(1):9014. doi: 10.4081/or.2021.9014. eCollection 2021 Mar 30.
The aim of our study is to evaluate clinical long-term results and determine changes in periprosthetic bone density of the custom-made hip prostheses Evolution-K and Adaptiva . Periprosthetic bone density were evaluated by means of DEXA (LunariDXA- Prodigy bone densitometer) with a long-term follow-up of 16 (15-18) years (Evolution-K) in 24 patients and 13 (13-15) years (Adaptiva) in 41 patients. Evolution- K had a survival rate of 92% and yielded 79/100 points in Harris Hip Score, a mediocre result. Adaptiva had a survival rate of 99% and achieved a good score of 88/100 points. Bone density measurements demonstrated the greatest loss of bone density in the proximal regions of interest (ROI) for both prosthesis types (Evolution-K: -25.8% ROI 1, -40.3% ROI 7; -8.3% ROI 2, -10.4% ROI 6; Adaptiva: -29.8% ROI 7, -6.8% ROI 6, +14.3% ROI 3, +3.1% ROI 4). Adaptiva yielded a good clinical result as compared to Evolution-K with only average clinical results. Both prostheses clearly showed signs of "stress shielding". Here, the Adaptiva achieved reduced bone density loss as compared to the Evolution-K.
我们研究的目的是评估定制髋关节假体Evolution-K和Adaptiva的临床长期效果,并确定假体周围骨密度的变化。通过双能X线吸收法(Lunari DXA-Prodigy骨密度仪)对24例患者的Evolution-K假体进行了长达16(15 - 18)年的长期随访,对41例患者的Adaptiva假体进行了13(13 - 15)年的长期随访,以评估假体周围骨密度。Evolution-K的生存率为92%,Harris髋关节评分得分为79/100分,结果一般。Adaptiva的生存率为99%,获得了88/100分的良好评分。骨密度测量显示,两种假体类型在感兴趣的近端区域(ROI)骨密度损失最大(Evolution-K:ROI 1为-25.8%,ROI 7为-40.3%;ROI 2为-8.3%,ROI 6为-10.4%;Adaptiva:ROI 7为-29.8%,ROI 6为-6.8%,ROI 3为+14.3%,ROI 4为+3.1%)。与临床结果一般的Evolution-K相比,Adaptiva取得了良好的临床效果。两种假体均明显显示出“应力遮挡”迹象。在此,与Evolution-K相比,Adaptiva的骨密度损失有所减少。