• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Short Diagnosis-to-Treatment Interval Is Associated With Higher Circulating Tumor DNA Levels in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.短的诊断-治疗间隔与弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤中更高的循环肿瘤 DNA 水平相关。
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Aug 10;39(23):2605-2616. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02573. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
2
Prognostic value of metabolic tumour volume on baseline F-FDG PET/CT in addition to NCCN-IPI in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: further stratification of the group with a high-risk NCCN-IPI.基线 F-FDG PET/CT 代谢肿瘤体积对弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者 NCCN-IPI 的预后价值:对高危 NCCN-IPI 组的进一步分层。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Jul;46(7):1417-1427. doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04309-4. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
3
Circulating Tumor DNA Measurements As Early Outcome Predictors in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.循环肿瘤 DNA 测量作为弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的早期预后预测指标。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;36(28):2845-2853. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.5246. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
4
Risk profiling of patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by measuring circulating tumor DNA.通过检测循环肿瘤 DNA 对复发/难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者进行风险分析。
Blood Adv. 2022 Mar 22;6(6):1651-1660. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006415.
5
Prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA in lymphoma: a meta-analysis.循环肿瘤 DNA 在淋巴瘤中的预后价值:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Exp Med. 2022 Feb;22(1):1-7. doi: 10.1007/s10238-021-00718-8. Epub 2021 May 15.
6
Diagnosis-to-Treatment Interval Is an Important Clinical Factor in Newly Diagnosed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma and Has Implication for Bias in Clinical Trials.诊断至治疗的时间间隔是新发弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的一个重要临床因素,对临床试验中的偏倚有影响。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun 1;36(16):1603-1610. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.5198. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
7
The significance of pretreatment anemia in the era of R-IPI and NCCN-IPI prognostic risk assessment tools: a dual-center study in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients.R-IPI和NCCN-IPI预后风险评估工具时代预处理贫血的意义:一项针对弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者的双中心研究
Eur J Haematol. 2015 Dec;95(6):538-44. doi: 10.1111/ejh.12529. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
8
Prognostic Value of Anemia and C-Reactive Protein Levels in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.贫血和C反应蛋白水平在弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤中的预后价值
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2015 Nov;15(11):671-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2015.07.639. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
9
NCCN-IPI score-independent prognostic potential of pretreatment uric acid levels for clinical outcome of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients.NCCN-IPI评分独立的预处理尿酸水平对弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者临床结局的预后潜力。
Br J Cancer. 2016 Nov 8;115(10):1264-1272. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.325. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
10
Modified number of extranodal involved sites as a prognosticator in R-CHOP-treated patients with disseminated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者接受 R-CHOP 治疗后,结外受累部位数的改变可作为预后预测因素。
Korean J Intern Med. 2010 Sep;25(3):301-8. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2010.25.3.301. Epub 2010 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Time-to-Treatment Initiation and First Inter-Cycle Delay in Patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma.霍奇金淋巴瘤患者开始治疗时间及首个周期间期延迟的影响
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 10;14(12):4085. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124085.
2
Update on Liquid Biopsy.液体活检最新进展。
Radiology. 2025 Jun;315(3):e241030. doi: 10.1148/radiol.241030.
3
Clinical Implication of Sequential Circulating Tumor DNA Assessments for the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.序贯循环肿瘤DNA评估在弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤治疗中的临床意义
Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 22;17(11):1734. doi: 10.3390/cancers17111734.
4
Liquid Biopsy in B and T Cell Lymphomas: From Bench to Bedside.B细胞和T细胞淋巴瘤的液体活检:从实验台到病床旁
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 May 19;26(10):4869. doi: 10.3390/ijms26104869.
5
Reliable detection of CNS lymphoma-derived circulating tumor DNA in cerebrospinal fluid using multi-biomarker NGS profiling: insights from a real-world study.使用多生物标志物NGS分析可靠检测脑脊液中中枢神经系统淋巴瘤来源的循环肿瘤DNA:一项真实世界研究的见解
Biomark Res. 2025 May 9;13(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s40364-025-00777-z.
6
Circulating tumor DNA in lymphoma: technologies and applications.淋巴瘤中的循环肿瘤DNA:技术与应用
J Hematol Oncol. 2025 Mar 11;18(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13045-025-01673-7.
7
Liquid Biopsy for Enhanced Specificity in Identifying Somatic Mutations in Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Comparative Study of Cell-Free DNA and Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissue.液体活检提高侵袭性非霍奇金大B细胞淋巴瘤体细胞突变检测特异性的研究:游离DNA与福尔马林固定石蜡包埋组织的比较
Int J Lab Hematol. 2025 Aug;47(4):669-679. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.14454. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
8
Molecular clustering on ctDNA improves the prognostic stratification of patients with DLBCL compared with ctDNA levels.与循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)水平相比,ctDNA上的分子聚类改善了弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者的预后分层。
Blood Adv. 2025 Apr 8;9(7):1692-1701. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024014136.
9
Molecular measurable residual disease by immunoglobulin gene rearrangements on circulating tumor DNA predicts outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.通过循环肿瘤DNA上免疫球蛋白基因重排检测的分子可测量残留病可预测弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤的预后。
Haematologica. 2025 Jul 1;110(7):1573-1583. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2024.286331. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
10
Blood Plasma Methylated DNA Markers in the Detection of Lymphoma: Discovery, Validation, and Clinical Pilot.血浆甲基化DNA标志物在淋巴瘤检测中的发现、验证及临床预试验
Am J Hematol. 2025 Feb;100(2):218-228. doi: 10.1002/ajh.27533. Epub 2024 Nov 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostication with circulating tumor DNA: is it ready for prime time?循环肿瘤 DNA 预测:是否已准备好成为主流?
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2019 Dec 6;2019(1):47-52. doi: 10.1182/hematology.2019000013.
2
Multidisciplinary diagnostics of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: European Research Initiative on CLL - ERIC recommendations.慢性淋巴细胞白血病的多学科诊断:欧洲慢性淋巴细胞白血病研究倡议(ERIC)建议
Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2020 Jul-Sep;42(3):269-274. doi: 10.1016/j.htct.2019.07.006. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
3
Dynamic Risk Profiling Using Serial Tumor Biomarkers for Personalized Outcome Prediction.使用肿瘤标志物连续动态分析进行个体化预后预测。
Cell. 2019 Jul 25;178(3):699-713.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.06.011. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
4
Dose-Adjusted EPOCH-R Compared With R-CHOP as Frontline Therapy for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Clinical Outcomes of the Phase III Intergroup Trial Alliance/CALGB 50303.剂量调整 EPOCH-R 与 R-CHOP 作为弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤一线治疗的比较:III 期联合组试验联盟/CALGB 50303 的临床结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jul 20;37(21):1790-1799. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01994. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
5
Randomized Phase III Trial of Ibrutinib and Rituximab Plus Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone in Non-Germinal Center B-Cell Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.伊布替尼和利妥昔单抗联合环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱和泼尼松治疗非生发中心 B 细胞弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的随机 III 期临床试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 May 20;37(15):1285-1295. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.02403. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
6
Liquid biopsy in lymphoma.淋巴瘤中的液体活检
Haematologica. 2019 Apr;104(4):648-652. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2018.206177. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
7
Prognostic impact of diagnosis to treatment interval (DTI) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients: a real-life monocentric study.弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者诊断至治疗间隔(DTI)的预后影响:一项真实世界的单中心研究。
Leuk Lymphoma. 2019 Mar;60(3):839-841. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2018.1508671. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
8
Circulating Tumor DNA Measurements As Early Outcome Predictors in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.循环肿瘤 DNA 测量作为弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的早期预后预测指标。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;36(28):2845-2853. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.5246. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
9
Non-invasive monitoring of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by cell-free DNA high-throughput targeted sequencing: analysis of a prospective cohort.采用游离 DNA 高通量靶向测序对弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤进行无创监测:前瞻性队列分析。
Blood Cancer J. 2018 Aug 1;8(8):74. doi: 10.1038/s41408-018-0111-6.
10
Positron Emission Tomography-Guided Therapy of Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas (PETAL): A Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Trial.正电子发射断层扫描引导治疗侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤(PETAL):一项多中心、随机 III 期试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jul 10;36(20):2024-2034. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.8093. Epub 2018 May 11.

短的诊断-治疗间隔与弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤中更高的循环肿瘤 DNA 水平相关。

Short Diagnosis-to-Treatment Interval Is Associated With Higher Circulating Tumor DNA Levels in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Divisions of Oncology and Hematology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2021 Aug 10;39(23):2605-2616. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02573. Epub 2021 Apr 28.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.20.02573
PMID:33909455
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8331064/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Patients with Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) in need of immediate therapy are largely under-represented in clinical trials. The diagnosis-to-treatment interval (DTI) has recently been described as a metric to quantify such patient selection bias, with short DTI being associated with adverse risk factors and inferior outcomes. Here, we characterized the relationships between DTI, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), conventional risk factors, and clinical outcomes, with the goal of defining objective disease metrics contributing to selection bias.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We evaluated pretreatment ctDNA levels in 267 patients with DLBCL treated across multiple centers in Europe and the United States using Cancer Personalized Profiling by Deep Sequencing. Pretreatment ctDNA levels were correlated with DTI, total metabolic tumor volumes (TMTVs), the International Prognostic Index (IPI), and outcome.

RESULTS

Short DTI was associated with advanced-stage disease ( .001) and higher IPI ( .001). We also found an inverse correlation between DTI and TMTV ( 0.37; .001). Similarly, pretreatment ctDNA levels were significantly associated with stage, IPI, and TMTV (all .001), demonstrating that both DTI and ctDNA reflect disease burden. Notably, patients with shorter DTI had higher pretreatment ctDNA levels ( .001). Pretreatment ctDNA levels predicted short DTI independent of the IPI ( .001). Although each risk factor was significantly associated with event-free survival in univariable analysis, ctDNA level was prognostic of event-free survival independent of DTI and IPI in multivariable Cox regression (ctDNA: hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% CI [1.2 to 2.0]; IPI: 1.1 [0.9 to 1.3]; -DTI: 1.1 [1.0 to 1.2]).

CONCLUSION

Short DTI largely reflects baseline tumor burden, which can be objectively measured using pretreatment ctDNA levels. Pretreatment ctDNA levels therefore have utility for quantifying and guarding against selection biases in prospective DLBCL clinical trials.

摘要

目的

需要立即进行治疗的弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤 (DLBCL) 患者在临床试验中代表性严重不足。诊断至治疗的间隔 (DTI) 最近被描述为量化这种患者选择偏倚的指标,较短的 DTI 与不良风险因素和较差的结果相关。在这里,我们描述了 DTI、循环肿瘤 DNA (ctDNA)、常规风险因素与临床结果之间的关系,旨在确定导致选择偏倚的客观疾病指标。

患者和方法

我们使用深度测序的癌症个体化分析对来自欧洲和美国多个中心的 267 例 DLBCL 患者进行了治疗前 ctDNA 水平评估。将治疗前 ctDNA 水平与 DTI、总代谢肿瘤体积 (TMTV)、国际预后指数 (IPI) 和结果进行了相关性分析。

结果

较短的 DTI 与晚期疾病相关(P<.001),且 IPI 更高(P<.001)。我们还发现 DTI 与 TMTV 之间呈负相关(P=.001)。同样,治疗前 ctDNA 水平与分期、IPI 和 TMTV 显著相关(均 P<.001),表明 DTI 和 ctDNA 均反映了疾病负担。值得注意的是,较短 DTI 的患者治疗前 ctDNA 水平更高(P<.001)。在多变量 Cox 回归分析中,ctDNA 水平独立于 IPI 预测了较短的 DTI(P<.001)。尽管在单变量分析中每个风险因素与无事件生存均显著相关,但 ctDNA 水平在多变量 Cox 回归分析中独立于 DTI 和 IPI 预测了无事件生存(ctDNA:危险比,1.5;95%CI [1.2 至 2.0];IPI:1.1 [0.9 至 1.3];-DTI:1.1 [1.0 至 1.2])。

结论

较短的 DTI 在很大程度上反映了基线肿瘤负担,可通过治疗前 ctDNA 水平进行客观测量。因此,治疗前 ctDNA 水平可用于量化和防范前瞻性 DLBCL 临床试验中的选择偏倚。