Zitikyte Gabriele, Roy Danielle Carole, Dhaliwal Shan, Lun Ronda, Hutton Brian, Shorr Risa, Dowlatshahi Dar
University of Ottawa, School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 28;16(4):e0250553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250553. eCollection 2021.
Patients with minor ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack represent a high-risk population for recurrent stroke. No direct comparison exists comparing dual antiplatelet therapy regimens-namely, Ticagrelor and Aspirin versus Clopidogrel and Aspirin. This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) will examine the efficacy of these two different antiplatelet regimens in preventing recurrent stroke and mortality up to 30 days.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) will be searched with the assistance of a medical information specialist. Two independent reviewers will screen studies for inclusion; eligible studies will include randomized controlled trials that enrolled adults presenting with acute minor ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack and compared one or more of the interventions against each other and/or a control. The primary outcomes will be recurrent ischemic stroke up to 30 days from symptom onset. Secondary outcomes will include safety outcomes (I.e. major bleeding and mortality), functional disability, and outcomes up to 90 days from symptom onset. A Bayesian approach to NMA will be implemented using the BUGSnet function in R Software. Between group comparisons for time-to-event (TTE) and dichotomous outcomes will be presented in terms of hazard ratios and odds ratios with 95% credible intervals, respectively. Secondary effect measures of treatment ranking will also be estimated.
No formal research ethics approval are necessary. We will disseminate our findings through scientific conference presentations, peer-reviewed publications, and social media/the press. The findings from this review will aid clinicians in decision-making on the choice of antithrombotic therapy in a high-risk stroke population and could be important in the development of future treatment trials and guidelines. Registration ID with Open Science Framework: 10.17605/OSF.IO/XDJYZ.
轻度缺血性中风或短暂性脑缺血发作患者是复发性中风的高危人群。目前尚无对双联抗血小板治疗方案(即替格瑞洛与阿司匹林联用对比氯吡格雷与阿司匹林联用)的直接比较。本系统评价和网状Meta分析(NMA)将研究这两种不同抗血小板方案在预防复发性中风及30天内死亡率方面的疗效。
将在医学信息专家的协助下检索MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)。两名独立评审员将筛选纳入研究;符合条件的研究将包括随机对照试验,这些试验纳入了患有急性轻度缺血性中风或短暂性脑缺血发作的成年人,并对一种或多种干预措施相互之间和/或与对照进行了比较。主要结局将是症状发作后30天内的复发性缺血性中风。次要结局将包括安全性结局(即大出血和死亡率)、功能残疾以及症状发作后90天内的结局。将使用R软件中的BUGSnet函数实施贝叶斯网状Meta分析方法。组间时间-事件(TTE)比较和二分结局将分别以风险比和比值比以及95%可信区间呈现。还将估计治疗排名的次要效应指标。
无需正式的研究伦理批准。我们将通过科学会议报告、同行评审出版物以及社交媒体/新闻媒体传播我们的研究结果。本评价的结果将有助于临床医生在高危中风人群中选择抗血栓治疗时做出决策,并且可能对未来治疗试验和指南的制定具有重要意义。开放科学框架注册ID:10.17605/OSF.IO/XDJYZ。