• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低剂量锥形束 CT 对牙种植体规划的影响。

Influence of Low-Dose Protocols of CBCT on Dental Implant Planning.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021 Mar-Apr;36(2):307-312. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8773.

DOI:10.11607/jomi.8773
PMID:33909720
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of low-dose protocols, with different numbers of basis images, on the precision of linear bone measurements in CBCT images.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five polyurethane mandibles, with different levels of bone resorption, were used in this in vitro study. To obtain the reference standard, landmarks were made in the mandibular superior and buccal cortices, and then a digital caliper was used to measure the bone height and thickness at these regions. CBCT images were obtained with the PaX-i3D (Vatech) unit set at 50 kV, 4 mA, 0.2-mm voxel size and 50 × 50-mm field of view. Keeping these parameters fixed, each mandible was scanned twice, with different protocols: Low dose (L) had an acquisition time of 24 seconds and 720 basis images, and ultralow dose (UL) had an acquisition time of 15 seconds and 450 basis images. Then, measurements of bone height and thickness were performed on the images, using the previously determined landmarks as reference. The obtained data were submitted to statistical analysis, with a significance level of .05. Analysis of variance, Student t test, and intraclass correlation coefficient were employed.

RESULTS

Regarding bone height, there were no significant differences between the measurements obtained with the L and UL protocols (P = .8648). Additionally, the L and UL protocols did not differ in relation to the reference standard (P = .8717 and P = .9928, respectively). Likewise, there were no significant differences between the measurements obtained with the L and UL protocols (P = .7969) for bone thickness, nor between these protocols and the gold standard (P = .7455).

CONCLUSION

Considering the great demand for precise measurements in implantology, protocols of low-dose radiation can be used without compromising clinical planning.

摘要

目的

评估不同基图像数量的低剂量方案对 CBCT 图像中线性骨测量精度的影响。

材料与方法

本体外研究使用了五具具有不同程度骨质吸收的聚氨酯下颌骨。为了获得参考标准,在下颌骨的上皮质和颊皮质制作了标志点,然后使用数字卡尺测量这些区域的骨高度和厚度。使用 PaX-i3D(Vatech)单位以 50 kV、4 mA、0.2-mm 体素大小和 50×50-mm 视野获得 CBCT 图像。保持这些参数不变,每个下颌骨用两种不同的方案扫描两次:低剂量(L)的采集时间为 24 秒,有 720 个基图像;超低剂量(UL)的采集时间为 15 秒,有 450 个基图像。然后,使用之前确定的标志点作为参考,在图像上进行骨高度和厚度的测量。将获得的数据进行统计分析,显著性水平为.05。采用方差分析、学生 t 检验和组内相关系数进行分析。

结果

在骨高度方面,L 和 UL 方案获得的测量值之间没有显著差异(P =.8648)。此外,L 和 UL 方案与参考标准之间也没有差异(分别为 P =.8717 和 P =.9928)。同样,L 和 UL 方案获得的骨厚度测量值之间没有显著差异(P =.7969),与金标准之间也没有差异(P =.7455)。

结论

鉴于在种植体中对精确测量的巨大需求,可以使用低剂量辐射方案而不会影响临床规划。

相似文献

1
Influence of Low-Dose Protocols of CBCT on Dental Implant Planning.低剂量锥形束 CT 对牙种植体规划的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021 Mar-Apr;36(2):307-312. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8773.
2
Influence of Voxel Size on CBCT Images for Dental Implants Planning.体素大小对用于牙种植体规划的锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像的影响。
Eur J Dent. 2022 May;16(2):381-385. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1736388. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
3
Cone-beam computed tomography with ultra-low dose protocols for pre-implant radiographic assessment: An in vitro study.用于种植前影像学评估的超低剂量方案锥形束计算机断层扫描:一项体外研究。
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017;10(3):351-359.
4
Assessment of mandibular posterior regional landmarks using cone-beam computed tomography in dental implant surgery.在牙种植手术中使用锥形束计算机断层扫描评估下颌后牙区标志点
Ann Anat. 2016 May;205:53-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
5
Effect of Mandibular Angulation on Pre-Implant Site Measurement Accuracy Using CBCT.下颌骨角度对 CBCT 中种植前位点测量精度的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021 September/October;36(5):937–943. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8899. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
6
Influence of the milliamperage settings on cone beam computed tomography imaging for implant planning.毫安设置对用于种植体规划的锥形束计算机断层扫描成像的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Nov-Dec;29(6):1364-8. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3524. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
7
Influence of scan mode (180°/360°) of the cone beam computed tomography for preoperative dental implant measurements.锥形束计算机断层扫描扫描模式(180°/360°)对术前牙种植体测量的影响。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Feb;25(2):e155-8. doi: 10.1111/clr.12080. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
8
Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography versus conventional multidetector computed tomography for image-guided craniofacial implant planning: An in vitro study.锥形束 CT 与传统多层 CT 在颅面种植体图像引导规划中的可靠性和准确性:一项体外研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 May/June;34(3):665–672. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6915. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
9
Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging.颊骨高度和厚度的锥形束计算机断层扫描影像测量的准确性和可靠性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Nov;140(5):734-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.021.
10
Accuracy of linear measurements using cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in dental implant treatment planning.锥形束计算机断层扫描和全景X线摄影在牙种植治疗计划中进行线性测量的准确性
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Nov-Dec;30(6):1287-94. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4073.

引用本文的文献

1
Voxel Size and Field of View Influence on Periodontal Bone Assessment Using Four CBCT Systems: An Experimental Ex Vivo Analysis.体素大小和视野对四种锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)系统进行牙周骨评估的影响:一项体外实验分析
Tomography. 2025 Jun 25;11(7):74. doi: 10.3390/tomography11070074.
2
Accuracy of linear measurements for implant planning based on low-dose cone beam CT protocols: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于低剂量锥形束CT协议的种植体规划线性测量的准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2024 Apr 29;53(4):207-221. doi: 10.1093/dmfr/twae007.
3
Authors' response to: The problem in visualization and measuring tiny structures on CBCT-images.
作者对《锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像上微小结构的可视化和测量问题》的回应。
J Orofac Orthop. 2023 Sep;84(5):342-343. doi: 10.1007/s00056-023-00478-y.