• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

私人执业中种植体失败的风险因素:一项多中心生存分析。

Risk Factors for Dental Implant Failure in Private Practice: A Multicenter Survival Analysis.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021 Mar-Apr;36(2):388-394. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8983.

DOI:10.11607/jomi.8983
PMID:33909732
Abstract

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to quantify the probability of implant failure over time from intrinsic patient factors using a population of patients from multiple private practices.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The records for this retrospective, multicenter cohort study were randomly selected from eight private practices. The primary outcome variable was time to event (implant failure or last known follow-up). The included independent variables were age, sex, diabetes status, smoking status, and arch location. Analyses were performed with Cox proportional hazards on three models: univariate, full multivariate, and systemic factor multivariate. The probability of implant survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was calculated using univariate time-to-event modeling on log-normal distribution with 95% CIs and Cox proportional hazard tests for significance. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve was calculated for patients < 71 years of age.

RESULTS

Eight hundred thirty-five implant-level records from 378 patients were collected for analyses. The mean patient age was 60 years, and 48% were men, 15% reported a history of smoking, and 16% reported having diabetes. The follow-up time was as long as 17 years, with a mean of 23.1 months, and a median of 7 months. The hazard ratio (HR) for implant failure due to sex (HR = 1.18; 95% CI: 0.52 to 2.66), smoking (HR = 1.30; 95% CI: 0.49 to 3.46), diabetes (HR = 1.17; 95% CI: 0.35 to 3.86), and arch location (HR = 2.13 to 3.39) failed to reach the threshold within any Cox proportional hazards model (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

The implant survival probability for patients ≤ 70 years of age is 86.4% at 10 years in the course of routine private practice by experienced providers. Cautious interpretation of these results is critical, as the effects of known systemic risk factors are likely tempered by effective modifications in clinical decisions and protocols with short- and long-term follow-up maintenance.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过来自多个私人诊所的患者群体,从内在患者因素方面定量分析随时间推移种植体失败的概率。

材料和方法

本回顾性、多中心队列研究的记录是从 8 家私人诊所中随机选择的。主要结局变量是时间事件(种植体失败或最后一次已知随访)。纳入的独立变量包括年龄、性别、糖尿病状态、吸烟状况和牙弓位置。使用 Cox 比例风险分析在三个模型中进行分析:单变量、全多变量和系统性因素多变量。使用对数正态分布的单变量时间事件建模计算 1、5 和 10 年的种植体生存率,并进行 Cox 比例风险检验以确定显著性。对于<71 岁的患者,计算 Kaplan-Meier 生存曲线。

结果

共收集了 378 名患者的 835 个种植体水平记录进行分析。患者平均年龄为 60 岁,48%为男性,15%有吸烟史,16%有糖尿病史。随访时间最长达 17 年,平均随访时间为 23.1 个月,中位数为 7 个月。由于性别(HR=1.18;95%CI:0.52 至 2.66)、吸烟(HR=1.30;95%CI:0.49 至 3.46)、糖尿病(HR=1.17;95%CI:0.35 至 3.86)和牙弓位置(HR=2.13 至 3.39)的种植体失败风险比在任何 Cox 比例风险模型中都未达到阈值(P>.05)。

结论

在经验丰富的医生常规私人执业过程中,≤70 岁患者的种植体 10 年生存率为 86.4%。谨慎解释这些结果至关重要,因为在短期和长期随访维持下,临床决策和方案的有效调整可能会缓和已知系统性危险因素的影响。

相似文献

1
Risk Factors for Dental Implant Failure in Private Practice: A Multicenter Survival Analysis.私人执业中种植体失败的风险因素:一项多中心生存分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021 Mar-Apr;36(2):388-394. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8983.
2
Retrospective cohort study of 4591 Straumann implants in private practice setting, with up to 10-year follow-up. Part 1: multivariate survival analysis.对私人诊所环境中4591颗士卓曼种植体进行回顾性队列研究,随访时间长达10年。第1部分:多变量生存分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Nov;26(11):1345-54. doi: 10.1111/clr.12463. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
3
All-on-4® Treatment Concept for the Rehabilitation of the Completely Edentulous Mandible: A 7-Year Clinical and 5-Year Radiographic Retrospective Case Series with Risk Assessment for Implant Failure and Marginal Bone Level.全口4颗种植体治疗理念用于无牙下颌骨修复:一项7年临床及5年影像学回顾性病例系列研究,评估种植体失败及边缘骨水平风险
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Oct;17 Suppl 2:e531-41. doi: 10.1111/cid.12282. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
4
Comparing factors affecting dental-implant loss between age groups: A retrospective cohort study.比较不同年龄段影响种植牙脱落因素:回顾性队列研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Apr;23(2):208-215. doi: 10.1111/cid.12967. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
5
Effect of osteoporotic status on the survival of titanium dental implants.骨质疏松状态对牙科钛植入物存活情况的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Sep-Oct;23(5):905-10.
6
Immediate loading of splinted locking-taper implants: 1-year survival estimates and risk factors for failure.夹板式锁定锥形种植体的即刻负重:1年生存率评估及失败风险因素
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Jan-Feb;23(1):105-10.
7
Retrospective cohort study of the clinical performance of 1-stage dental implants.一期牙种植体临床表现的回顾性队列研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 May-Jun;18(3):399-405.
8
Association of Systemic Conditions with Dental Implant Failures in 6,384 Patients During a 31-Year Follow-up Period.31年随访期内6384例患者全身状况与牙种植失败的相关性
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Sep/Oct;32(5):1153-1161. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5888.
9
Risk factors affecting dental implant survival.影响牙种植体存活的危险因素。
J Oral Implantol. 2002;28(2):74-81. doi: 10.1563/1548-1336(2002)028<0074:RFADIS>2.3.CO;2.
10
Analysis of implant loss risk factors especially in maxillary molar location: A retrospective study of 6977 implants in Chinese individuals.分析种植体失败的风险因素,尤其是上颌磨牙区:对 6977 例中国人群种植体的回顾性研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Feb;21(1):138-144. doi: 10.1111/cid.12697. Epub 2018 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effects of Smoking on Dental Implant Failure: A Current Literature Update.吸烟对牙种植失败的影响:当前文献综述
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Sep 29;12(10):311. doi: 10.3390/dj12100311.
2
Peripheral Bone Removal versus Sequential Drilling Protocol in Dental Implant Surgery: A 5-Year Retrospective Study.牙种植手术中周边去骨与顺序钻孔方案:一项5年回顾性研究
Eur J Dent. 2024 May;18(2):640-644. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1772675. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
3
Long-term effect of implant-abutment connection type on marginal bone loss and survival of dental implants.
种植体-基台连接类型对牙种植体边缘骨吸收和存留率的长期影响。
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2022 Dec;52(6):496-508. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2200960048. Epub 2022 Jun 20.