• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情时代的课程创新:基于思维的教学理论及其应用

Curriculum Innovation in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Thinking-Based Instruction Theory and Its Application.

作者信息

Li Yangping, Zhang Xinru, Dai David Yun, Hu Weiping

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Modern Teaching Technology (Ministry of Education), Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.

Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 12;12:601607. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.601607. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.601607
PMID:33912100
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8071859/
Abstract

At the beginning of 2020, to stop the spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) to the campus, the Ministry of Education of China launched a policy "Suspension of classes without suspending schooling" for the spring semester of 2020. However, the drawbacks of online teaching (e.g., students' inadequate autonomous learning, the lack of effective online instruction) forced us to modify teaching strategies during this special period, especially developing courses that are suitable for student learning at home and improving their key competencies. In order to solve these problems, this study introduces some theoretical exploration and practical work of curriculum design under the guidance of thinking-based instruction theory (TBIT) during the pandemic. We firstly introduce TBIT, and elaborate on the curriculum design under the TBIT theoretical frame. Then we describe a series of TBIT-based micro-courses with the pandemic as background. A descriptive study is reported to illustrate the effects of three micro-courses. Results showed that, compared to national curricula, the TBIT-based micro-courses not only improved the course quality but also enhanced students' motivation and facilitated their online learning behavior (such as interactive communication) for the online courses. The current study has important implications for how to design effective and interesting online courses suitable under pandemic and capable of improving students' thinking abilities and key competencies.

摘要

2020年初,为防止新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)在校园内传播,中国教育部针对2020年春季学期出台了“停课不停学”政策。然而,在线教学的弊端(如学生自主学习不足、缺乏有效的在线指导)迫使我们在这一特殊时期调整教学策略,特别是开发适合学生在家学习的课程并提升他们的关键能力。为了解决这些问题,本研究介绍了疫情期间在思维导向教学理论(TBIT)指导下课程设计的一些理论探索和实践工作。我们首先介绍TBIT,并阐述TBIT理论框架下的课程设计。然后我们描述了一系列以疫情为背景的基于TBIT的微课程。报告了一项描述性研究以说明三门微课程的效果。结果表明,与国家课程相比,基于TBIT的微课程不仅提高了课程质量,还增强了学生的学习动机,并促进了他们在在线课程中的在线学习行为(如互动交流)。本研究对于如何设计在疫情下有效的、有趣的在线课程以及如何提高学生的思维能力和关键能力具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37b6/8071859/eb18ab9fb830/fpsyg-12-601607-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37b6/8071859/4c0a5eb6720d/fpsyg-12-601607-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37b6/8071859/530afa5387f3/fpsyg-12-601607-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37b6/8071859/43b0d36b7fea/fpsyg-12-601607-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37b6/8071859/eb18ab9fb830/fpsyg-12-601607-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37b6/8071859/4c0a5eb6720d/fpsyg-12-601607-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37b6/8071859/530afa5387f3/fpsyg-12-601607-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37b6/8071859/43b0d36b7fea/fpsyg-12-601607-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37b6/8071859/eb18ab9fb830/fpsyg-12-601607-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Curriculum Innovation in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Thinking-Based Instruction Theory and Its Application.新冠疫情时代的课程创新:基于思维的教学理论及其应用
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 12;12:601607. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.601607. eCollection 2021.
2
Online learning during COVID-19 produced equivalent or better student course performance as compared with pre-pandemic: empirical evidence from a school-wide comparative study.新冠疫情期间的在线学习与疫情前相比产生了相当或更好的学生课程表现:一项全校范围比较研究的实证证据。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Sep 16;21(1):495. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02909-z.
3
Flipped classroom frameworks improve efficacy in undergraduate practical courses - a quasi-randomized pilot study in otorhinolaryngology.翻转课堂模式在本科实践课程中的效果提升——耳鼻喉科学的准随机试点研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Dec 4;18(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1398-5.
4
Effectiveness of integrating case studies in online and face-to-face instruction of pathophysiology: a comparative study.将案例研究整合到病理生理学的在线和面对面教学中的效果:一项比较研究。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2013 Jun;37(2):201-6. doi: 10.1152/advan.00169.2012.
5
The Brandenburg reformed medical curriculum: study locally, work locally.勃兰登堡改革后的医学课程:就地学习,就地工作。
GMS J Med Educ. 2019 Oct 15;36(5):Doc49. doi: 10.3205/zma001257. eCollection 2019.
6
Integrating an Online Statistics Course With a Graduate Nursing Research Course for Enhanced Learning.将在线统计学课程与研究生护理研究课程相结合,以增强学习效果。
J Nurs Educ. 2020 Apr 1;59(4):227-230. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20200323-10.
7
A survey on the attitudes of Chinese medical students towards current pathology education.一项关于中国医学生对当前病理学教育态度的调查。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Aug 8;20(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02167-5.
8
Online or face-to-face instruction? A qualitative study on the electrocardiogram course at the University of Ulm to examine why students choose a particular format.线上还是面对面教学?对乌尔姆大学心电图课程的一项定性研究,旨在探讨学生选择特定教学形式的原因。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Nov 9;17(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1053-6.
9
[Exploration of multi-faceted model in plant biology teaching].[植物生物学教学中多维度模型的探索]
Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao. 2022 May 25;38(5):2012-2018. doi: 10.13345/j.cjb.210525.
10
Identifying Factors That Influence Student Perceptions of Stress in Biology Courses with Online Learning Modalities.识别影响采用在线学习模式的生物学课程中学生压力认知的因素。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2022 Apr 7;23(1). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00233-21. eCollection 2022 Apr.

引用本文的文献

1
Bullet screen in pre-clinical undergraduate pharmacology education: a survey study.临床医学本科生药理学教学中弹幕的应用:一项调查研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Nov 28;22(1):813. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03906-6.
2
Effects of COVID-19 on Japanese medical students' knowledge and attitudes toward e-learning in relation to performance on achievement tests.新型冠状病毒肺炎对日本医学生的知识和对电子学习的态度的影响与成就测试的表现有关。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 14;17(3):e0265356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265356. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Managing a Curriculum Innovation Process.管理课程创新过程。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2020 Aug 24;8(3):153. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy8030153.
2
COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University.新冠疫情与高等教育中的在线教学:以北京大学为例
Hum Behav Emerg Technol. 2020 Apr;2(2):113-115. doi: 10.1002/hbe2.191. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
3
COVID-19, school closures, and child poverty: a social crisis in the making.新冠疫情、学校停课与儿童贫困:一场正在形成的社会危机。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 May;5(5):e243-e244. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30084-0. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
4
Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors during the Initial Stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Epidemic among the General Population in China.中国民众在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情初期的即时心理反应及相关因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 6;17(5):1729. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051729.
5
Analogy, higher order thinking, and education.类比、高阶思维与教育。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2015 Mar-Apr;6(2):177-192. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1336. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
6
Active-constructive-interactive: a conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities.主动建构互动式:一种区分学习活动的概念框架。
Top Cogn Sci. 2009 Jan;1(1):73-105. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x.
7
Investigating the structure of semantic networks in low and high creative persons.探究低创造力和高创造力人群的语义网络结构。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Jun 10;8:407. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00407. eCollection 2014.
8
Science education. Science learning progressions.科学教育。科学学习进程。
Science. 2013 Jan 25;339(6118):396-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1228692.
9
The influences of course effort, mastery and performance goals, grade expectancies, and earned course grades on student ratings of course satisfaction.课程投入、掌握和表现目标、成绩期望以及所得课程成绩对学生课程满意度评价的影响。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2011 Dec;81(Pt 4):667-79. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2010.02011.x. Epub 2011 Jan 6.
10
Effects of a 'learn to think' intervention programme on primary school students.“学会思考”干预计划对小学生的影响。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2011 Dec;81(Pt 4):531-57. doi: 10.1348/2044-8279.002007. Epub 2010 Dec 7.