Suppr超能文献

主动建构互动式:一种区分学习活动的概念框架。

Active-constructive-interactive: a conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities.

作者信息

Chi Michelene T H

机构信息

Psychology in Education, Arizona State University.

出版信息

Top Cogn Sci. 2009 Jan;1(1):73-105. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x.

Abstract

Active, constructive, and interactive are terms that are commonly used in the cognitive and learning sciences. They describe activities that can be undertaken by learners. However, the literature is actually not explicit about how these terms can be defined; whether they are distinct; and whether they refer to overt manifestations, learning processes, or learning outcomes. Thus, a framework is provided here that offers a way to differentiate active, constructive, and interactive in terms of observable overt activities and underlying learning processes. The framework generates a testable hypothesis for learning: that interactive activities are most likely to be better than constructive activities, which in turn might be better than active activities, which are better than being passive. Studies from the literature are cited to provide evidence in support of this hypothesis. Moreover, postulating underlying learning processes allows us to interpret evidence in the literature more accurately. Specifying distinct overt activities for active, constructive, and interactive also offers suggestions for how learning activities can be coded and how each kind of activity might be elicited.

摘要

主动、建构性和互动性是认知科学和学习科学中常用的术语。它们描述了学习者可以从事的活动。然而,文献实际上并未明确说明这些术语如何定义;它们是否有区别;以及它们指的是外在表现、学习过程还是学习结果。因此,本文提供了一个框架,该框架提供了一种方法,可根据可观察到的外在活动和潜在的学习过程来区分主动、建构性和互动性。该框架产生了一个关于学习的可检验假设:互动活动最有可能优于建构性活动,而建构性活动反过来可能优于主动活动,主动活动又优于被动状态。引用文献中的研究来为这一假设提供支持证据。此外,假设潜在的学习过程使我们能够更准确地解释文献中的证据。为主动、建构性和互动性指定不同的外在活动,也为如何对学习活动进行编码以及如何引发每种活动提供了建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验