Chi Michelene T H
Psychology in Education, Arizona State University.
Top Cogn Sci. 2009 Jan;1(1):73-105. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x.
Active, constructive, and interactive are terms that are commonly used in the cognitive and learning sciences. They describe activities that can be undertaken by learners. However, the literature is actually not explicit about how these terms can be defined; whether they are distinct; and whether they refer to overt manifestations, learning processes, or learning outcomes. Thus, a framework is provided here that offers a way to differentiate active, constructive, and interactive in terms of observable overt activities and underlying learning processes. The framework generates a testable hypothesis for learning: that interactive activities are most likely to be better than constructive activities, which in turn might be better than active activities, which are better than being passive. Studies from the literature are cited to provide evidence in support of this hypothesis. Moreover, postulating underlying learning processes allows us to interpret evidence in the literature more accurately. Specifying distinct overt activities for active, constructive, and interactive also offers suggestions for how learning activities can be coded and how each kind of activity might be elicited.
主动、建构性和互动性是认知科学和学习科学中常用的术语。它们描述了学习者可以从事的活动。然而,文献实际上并未明确说明这些术语如何定义;它们是否有区别;以及它们指的是外在表现、学习过程还是学习结果。因此,本文提供了一个框架,该框架提供了一种方法,可根据可观察到的外在活动和潜在的学习过程来区分主动、建构性和互动性。该框架产生了一个关于学习的可检验假设:互动活动最有可能优于建构性活动,而建构性活动反过来可能优于主动活动,主动活动又优于被动状态。引用文献中的研究来为这一假设提供支持证据。此外,假设潜在的学习过程使我们能够更准确地解释文献中的证据。为主动、建构性和互动性指定不同的外在活动,也为如何对学习活动进行编码以及如何引发每种活动提供了建议。