Department of Temporomandibular Disorders, Division of Prosthodontics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poland.
Department of Dental Surgery, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland.
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2021 Apr;30(4):441-447. doi: 10.17219/acem/130358.
As ultrasonography provides objective parameters and values, it is a reliable method of examining the structure and dimensions of the masseter muscle. Although the method is well known, there is no standardization in clinical examination and data analysis yet.
The study aimed to measure masseter muscle thickness in designated areas to establish the most repeatable and clinically applicable method of ultrasound examination, and to assess differences in measurements in designated areas for clinical purposes by devising the size-independent parameter. The size-independent parameter may potentially be more clinically applicable than distance records, which are affected by the size of the subject.
An ultrasound examination of 124 masseter muscles was performed. Axial examination in 3 horizontal regions (lower, middle and upper) and coronal examination in 2 vertical regions (proximal and distal) was carried out. Masseter muscle thickness was measured in every designated area when relaxed (muscle at rest (RMT)) and with clenched teeth (contracted muscle (CMT)). A morphological independent functional index of thickness difference (FITD) was calculated.
The study revealed very high statistical differences between RMT and CMT (p < 0.0001) in all designated areas but with location variations. Masseter muscle thickness significantly differed depending on the examined area and transducer projection.
The ultrasound study showed that masseter muscle thickness significantly differs depending on the examined area. The authors emphasize the necessity to examine the masseter muscle in specified areas with both coronal and axial projections to achieve objective and repeatable examination. Notable clinical value is assigned to FITD, which is independent from the morphological dimensions of the muscle.
超声检查可提供客观的参数和数值,是检查咬肌结构和大小的可靠方法。尽管这种方法广为人知,但在临床检查和数据分析方面尚未实现标准化。
本研究旨在测量指定区域的咬肌厚度,以确定超声检查最具可重复性和临床适用性的方法,并通过设计与尺寸无关的参数来评估指定区域测量值的差异,以便于临床应用。与受个体大小影响的距离记录相比,该与尺寸无关的参数可能更具临床适用性。
对 124 例咬肌进行了超声检查。在 3 个水平区域(下、中、上)进行轴向检查,在 2 个垂直区域(近、远)进行冠状检查。在放松状态(静息时的肌肉(RMT))和咬牙时(收缩时的肌肉(CMT)),对每个指定区域测量咬肌厚度。计算形态学独立的厚度差异功能指数(FITD)。
研究表明,在所有指定区域,RMT 和 CMT 之间存在非常显著的统计学差异(p < 0.0001),但存在位置变化。咬肌厚度取决于检查区域和换能器的投射。
超声研究表明,咬肌厚度取决于检查区域。作者强调有必要使用冠状和轴向投影检查指定区域的咬肌,以实现客观和可重复的检查。FITD 具有显著的临床价值,其与肌肉的形态学尺寸无关。