• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年听力损失患者使用助听器处理后的言语可懂度和主观质量比较。

A comparison of speech intelligibility and subjective quality with hearing-aid processing in older adults with hearing loss.

机构信息

SLHS Department, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.

Audio Engineering Technology, Belmont University, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

Int J Audiol. 2022 Jan;61(1):46-58. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1900609. Epub 2021 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1080/14992027.2021.1900609
PMID:33913795
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11108258/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study characterised the relationship between speech intelligibility and quality in listeners with hearing loss for a range of hearing-aid processing settings and acoustic conditions.

DESIGN

Binaural speech intelligibility scores and quality ratings were measured for sentences presented in babble noise and processed through a hearing-aid simulation. The intelligibility-quality relationship was investigated by (1) assessing the effects of experimental conditions on each task; (2) directly comparing intelligibility scores and quality ratings for each participant across the range of conditions; and (3) comparing the association between signal envelope fidelity (represented by a cepstral correlation metric) and intelligibility and quality.

STUDY SAMPLE

Participants were 15 adults (7 females; age range 59-81 years) with mild to moderately severe sensorineural hearing loss.

RESULTS

Intelligibility and quality showed a positive association both with each other and with changes to signal fidelity introduced by the entire acoustic and signal-processing system including the additive noise and the hearing-aid output. As signal fidelity decreased, quality ratings changed at a slower rate than intelligibility scores. Individual psychometric functions were more variable for quality compared to intelligibility.

CONCLUSIONS

Variability in the intelligibility-quality relationship reinforces the importance of measuring both intelligibility and quality in clinical hearing-aid fittings.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述一系列助听器处理设置和声学条件下听力损失患者的言语可懂度和质量之间的关系。

设计

在噪声环境中呈现句子,并通过助听器模拟进行处理,测量双耳言语可懂度得分和质量等级。通过(1)评估实验条件对每个任务的影响;(2)直接比较每个参与者在不同条件下的可懂度得分和质量等级;(3)比较信号包络保真度(由倒谱相关度量表示)与可懂度和质量之间的关联,研究了可懂度-质量关系。

研究对象

参与者为 15 名成年人(7 名女性;年龄 59-81 岁),患有轻度至中度感音神经性听力损失。

结果

可懂度和质量彼此之间以及与整个声信号处理系统(包括附加噪声和助听器输出)引入的信号保真度变化均呈正相关。随着信号保真度的降低,质量等级的变化速度比可懂度得分慢。与可懂度相比,质量的个体心理测量函数更具变异性。

结论

可懂度-质量关系的可变性强调了在临床助听器适配中同时测量可懂度和质量的重要性。

相似文献

1
A comparison of speech intelligibility and subjective quality with hearing-aid processing in older adults with hearing loss.老年听力损失患者使用助听器处理后的言语可懂度和主观质量比较。
Int J Audiol. 2022 Jan;61(1):46-58. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1900609. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
2
Relationship Among Signal Fidelity, Hearing Loss, and Working Memory for Digital Noise Suppression.数字噪声抑制中信号保真度、听力损失与工作记忆之间的关系。
Ear Hear. 2015 Sep-Oct;36(5):505-16. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000173.
3
Working memory, age, and hearing loss: susceptibility to hearing aid distortion.工作记忆、年龄与听力损失:助听器失真的易感性。
Ear Hear. 2013 May-Jun;34(3):251-60. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318271aa5e.
4
Understanding Variability in Individual Response to Hearing Aid Signal Processing in Wearable Hearing Aids.理解可穿戴式助听器中个体对助听器信号处理反应的可变性。
Ear Hear. 2019 Nov/Dec;40(6):1280-1292. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000717.
5
Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived speech quality.噪声、非线性处理和线性滤波对感知语音质量的影响。
Ear Hear. 2010 Jun;31(3):420-36. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181d3d4f3.
6
Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.慢作用宽动态范围压缩对模拟听力损失听众的言语清晰度测量及言语质量评分的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005 Jun;48(3):702-14. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2005/048).
7
An overview of the HASPI and HASQI metrics for predicting speech intelligibility and speech quality for normal hearing, hearing loss, and hearing aids.HASPI 和 HASQI 指标概述,用于预测正常听力、听力损失和助听器的语音可懂度和语音质量。
Hear Res. 2022 Dec;426:108608. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108608. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
8
Effects of Directional Microphone and Noise Reduction on Subcortical and Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials in Older Listeners With Hearing Loss.方向性麦克风和降噪对听力损失老年患者皮质下和皮质听觉诱发电位的影响。
Ear Hear. 2020 Sep/Oct;41(5):1282-1293. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000847.
9
Effects of noise reduction on speech intelligibility, perceived listening effort, and personal preference in hearing-impaired listeners.降噪对听力障碍者言语可懂度、感知聆听努力程度和个人偏好的影响。
Trends Hear. 2014 Oct 13;18:2331216514553924. doi: 10.1177/2331216514553924.
10
Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.双耳预处理策略比较III:正常听力和听力受损听众的言语可懂度
Trends Hear. 2015 Dec 30;19:2331216515618609. doi: 10.1177/2331216515618609.

引用本文的文献

1
Binaural speech intelligibility for combinations of noise, reverberation, and hearing-aid signal processing.噪声、混响和助听器信号处理组合下的双耳语音可懂度。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 15;20(1):e0317266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317266. eCollection 2025.
2
A Contemporary Review of Clinical Factors Involved in Speech-Perspectives from a Prosthodontist Point of View.当代临床因素综述:从修复角度看言语问题。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jul 18;59(7):1322. doi: 10.3390/medicina59071322.
3
A review of auditory processing and cognitive change during normal ageing, and the implications for setting hearing aids for older adults.

本文引用的文献

1
The Type of Noise Influences Quality Ratings for Noisy Speech in Hearing Aid Users.噪声类型会影响助听器使用者对噪声环境下言语的质量评级。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Dec 14;63(12):4300-4313. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00156. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
2
Quantifying the Range of Signal Modification in Clinically Fit Hearing Aids.量化临床适用助听器中的信号修改范围。
Ear Hear. 2020 Mar-Apr;41(2):433-441. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000767.
3
Integrating a remote microphone with hearing-aid processing.将远程麦克风与助听器处理相结合。
正常衰老过程中听觉处理与认知变化的综述及其对老年人助听器适配的启示
Front Neurol. 2023 Jun 20;14:1122420. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1122420. eCollection 2023.
4
An overview of the HASPI and HASQI metrics for predicting speech intelligibility and speech quality for normal hearing, hearing loss, and hearing aids.HASPI 和 HASQI 指标概述,用于预测正常听力、听力损失和助听器的语音可懂度和语音质量。
Hear Res. 2022 Dec;426:108608. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108608. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 Jun;145(6):3551. doi: 10.1121/1.5111339.
4
Psychometric function slope for speech-in-noise and speech-in-speech: Effects of development and aging.言语感知中噪声和言语的心理物理函数斜率:发育和衰老的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 Apr;145(4):EL284. doi: 10.1121/1.5097377.
5
Sound Quality Effects of an Adaptive Nonlinear Frequency Compression Processor with Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.具有正常听力和听力受损听众的自适应非线性频率压缩处理器的音质效果
J Am Acad Audiol. 2019 Jul/Aug;30(7):552-563. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16179. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
6
Externalization of remote microphone signals using a structural binaural model of the head and pinna.使用头部和耳廓的结构双耳模型实现远程麦克风信号的外部化。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 May;143(5):2666. doi: 10.1121/1.5032326.
7
Characteristics of Real-World Signal to Noise Ratios and Speech Listening Situations of Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.真实环境信噪比特征及中老年轻-中度听力损失患者的言语聆听情况。
Ear Hear. 2018 Mar/Apr;39(2):293-304. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000486.
8
Acoustic and perceptual effects of amplitude and frequency compression on high-frequency speech.幅度和频率压缩对高频语音的声学及感知效应
J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Aug;142(2):908. doi: 10.1121/1.4997938.
9
Hearing aid fitting and fine-tuning based on estimated individual traits.基于个体特征估计的助听器验配与微调。
Int J Audiol. 2018 Jun;57(sup3):S139-S145. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1257163. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
10
Investigating Differences in Preferred Noise Reduction Strength Among Hearing Aid Users.研究助听器使用者对降噪强度的偏好差异。
Trends Hear. 2016 Sep 7;20:2331216516655794. doi: 10.1177/2331216516655794.