• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1 年期血压变异性与冠心病成人长期死亡率的相关性:一项随机临床试验的事后分析。

Association of 1-Year Blood Pressure Variability With Long-term Mortality Among Adults With Coronary Artery Disease: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine and Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville.

Center for Integrative Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e218418. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8418.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8418
PMID:33914047
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8085725/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Accumulating evidence indicates that higher blood pressure (BP) variability from one physician office visit to the next (hereafter referred to as visit-to-visit BP variability) is associated with poor outcomes. Short-term measurement (throughout 1 year) of visit-to-visit BP variability in high-risk older patients may help identify patients at increased risk of death.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether short-term visit-to-visit BP variability is associated with increased long-term mortality risk.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The US cohort of the International Verapamil SR-Trandolapril Study (INVEST), a randomized clinical trial of 16 688 patients aged 50 years or older with hypertension and coronary artery disease, was conducted between September 2, 1997, and December 15, 2000, with in-trial follow-up through February 14, 2003. The study evaluated a calcium antagonist (sustained-release verapamil plus trandolapril) vs β-blocker (atenolol plus hydrochlorothiazide) treatment strategy. Blood pressure measurement visits were scheduled every 6 weeks for the first 6 months and biannually thereafter. Statistical analysis was performed from September 2, 1997, to May 1, 2014.

EXPOSURES

Visit-to-visit systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP variability during the first year of enrollment using 4 different BP variability measures: standard deviation, coefficient of variation, average real variability, and variability independent of the mean.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

All-cause death, assessed via the US National Death Index, beginning after the exposure assessment period through May 1, 2014.

RESULTS

For the present post hoc analysis, long-term mortality data were available on 16 688 patients (9001 women [54%]; mean [SD] age, 66.5 [9.9] years; 45% White patients, 16% Black patients, and 37% Hispanic patients). During a mean (SD) follow-up of 10.9 (4.2) years, 5058 patients (30%) died. All 4 variability measures for SBP were significantly associated with long-term mortality after adjustment for baseline demographic characteristics and comorbidities. After comparison of lowest vs highest variability measure quintiles, the magnitude of the association with death remained statistically significant even after adjustment for baseline demographic characteristics and comorbidities (average real variability: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.18; 95% CI, 1.08-1.30; standard deviation: aHR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.04-1.24; coefficient of variation: aHR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06-1.26; variability independent of the mean: aHR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05-1.25). The signal was stronger in women compared with men. Associations of diastolic BP variability measures with death were weaker than for SBP and were not significant after adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study suggests that, in a large population of older patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease, short-term visit-to-visit SBP variability was associated with excess long-term mortality, especially for women. Efforts to identify and minimize visit-to-visit SBP variability may be important in reducing excess mortality later in life.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00133692.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb32/8085725/0ea35cb1baa8/jamanetwopen-e218418-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb32/8085725/52e02c9c48b1/jamanetwopen-e218418-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb32/8085725/0ea35cb1baa8/jamanetwopen-e218418-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb32/8085725/52e02c9c48b1/jamanetwopen-e218418-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb32/8085725/0ea35cb1baa8/jamanetwopen-e218418-g002.jpg
摘要

重要性

越来越多的证据表明,从一次就诊到下一次就诊的血压变异性(以下简称就诊间血压变异性)较高与预后不良有关。在高危老年患者中,通过短期(1 年内)测量就诊间血压变异性,可能有助于识别死亡风险增加的患者。

目的

评估短期就诊间血压变异性是否与长期死亡率风险增加相关。

设计、地点和参与者:这项在美国进行的国际维拉帕米 SR-曲多普利研究(INVEST)的队列研究是一项随机临床试验,纳入了 16688 名年龄在 50 岁及以上的高血压和冠心病患者,研究于 1997 年 9 月 2 日至 2000 年 12 月 15 日进行,在临床试验期间通过 2003 年 2 月 14 日进行随访。该研究评估了钙拮抗剂(缓释维拉帕米加曲多普利)与β受体阻滞剂(阿替洛尔加氢氯噻嗪)治疗策略。血压测量访视每 6 周进行一次,前 6 个月进行,此后每 6 个月进行一次。统计分析于 1997 年 9 月 2 日至 2014 年 5 月 1 日进行。

暴露情况

在登记后的第一年,使用 4 种不同的血压变异性测量方法(标准差、变异系数、平均真实变异性和均值独立变异性)来评估就诊间收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)变异性。

主要结局和测量指标

通过美国国家死亡指数评估所有原因死亡,起始于暴露评估期之后,直至 2014 年 5 月 1 日。

结果

本事后分析纳入了 16688 名患者(9001 名女性[54%];平均[标准差]年龄 66.5[9.9]岁;45%为白人患者,16%为黑人患者,37%为西班牙裔患者)的长期死亡率数据。在平均(标准差)10.9(4.2)年的随访期间,5058 名患者(30%)死亡。SBP 的所有 4 种变异性测量方法在调整基线人口统计学特征和合并症后,均与长期死亡率显著相关。在比较最低和最高变异性测量五分位数时,即使在调整基线人口统计学特征和合并症后,与死亡的关联仍然具有统计学意义(平均真实变异性:调整后的危险比[aHR],1.18;95%CI,1.08-1.30;标准差:aHR,1.14;95%CI,1.04-1.24;变异系数:aHR,1.15;95%CI,1.06-1.26;均值独立变异性:aHR,1.15;95%CI,1.05-1.25)。女性的相关性比男性更强。舒张压变异性测量与死亡的相关性较弱,且在调整后无统计学意义。

结论和相关性

本研究表明,在患有高血压和冠心病的老年患者中,短期就诊间 SBP 变异性与长期死亡率过高有关,尤其是女性。努力识别和尽量减少就诊间 SBP 变异性可能对降低日后的死亡率很重要。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT00133692。

相似文献

1
Association of 1-Year Blood Pressure Variability With Long-term Mortality Among Adults With Coronary Artery Disease: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.1 年期血压变异性与冠心病成人长期死亡率的相关性:一项随机临床试验的事后分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e218418. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8418.
2
A calcium antagonist vs a non-calcium antagonist hypertension treatment strategy for patients with coronary artery disease. The International Verapamil-Trandolapril Study (INVEST): a randomized controlled trial.钙拮抗剂与非钙拮抗剂治疗冠心病患者高血压的策略。国际维拉帕米-群多普利研究(INVEST):一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2003 Dec 3;290(21):2805-16. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.21.2805.
3
Effects of verapamil SR and atenolol on 24-hour blood pressure and heart rate in hypertension patients with coronary artery disease: an international verapamil SR-trandolapril ambulatory monitoring substudy.缓释维拉帕米和阿替洛尔对冠心病高血压患者24小时血压和心率的影响:一项国际缓释维拉帕米-群多普利动态监测子研究
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 2;10(4):e0122726. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122726. eCollection 2015.
4
INVEST revisited: review of findings from the International Verapamil SR-Trandolapril Study.再探INVEST研究:国际维拉帕米缓释片-群多普利研究结果综述
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2009 Nov;7(11):1329-40. doi: 10.1586/erc.09.102.
5
Mortality implications of lower DBP with lower achieved systolic pressures in coronary artery disease: long-term mortality results from the INternational VErapamil-trandolapril STudy US cohort.在冠心病中,较低的舒张压与较低的收缩压达标相关的死亡率影响:来自国际缬沙坦-特拉唑嗪研究美国队列的长期死亡率结果。
J Hypertens. 2018 Feb;36(2):419-427. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001559.
6
A Study of Antihypertensive Drugs and Depressive Symptoms (SADD-Sx) in patients treated with a calcium antagonist versus an atenolol hypertension Treatment Strategy in the International Verapamil SR-Trandolapril Study (INVEST).国际维拉帕米缓释片-群多普利研究(INVEST)中钙拮抗剂与阿替洛尔高血压治疗策略治疗患者的抗高血压药物与抑郁症状研究(SADD-Sx)
Psychosom Med. 2005 May-Jun;67(3):398-406. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000160468.69451.7f.
7
Dual therapy in hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease: the role of calcium channel blockers and beta-blockers.冠心病高血压患者的双重治疗:钙通道阻滞剂和β受体阻滞剂的作用
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2007;7 Suppl 1:25-9. doi: 10.2165/00129784-200707001-00004.
8
Pulse pressure and risk of cardiovascular outcomes in patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease: an INternational VErapamil SR-trandolapril STudy (INVEST) analysis.高血压合并冠状动脉疾病患者的脉压与心血管事件风险:一项国际维拉帕米缓释片 - 群多普利研究(INVEST)分析
Eur Heart J. 2009 Jun;30(11):1395-401. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp109. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
9
Rationale and design of the International Verapamil SR/Trandolapril Study (INVEST): an Internet-based randomized trial in coronary artery disease patients with hypertension.国际维拉帕米缓释片/群多普利研究(INVEST)的原理与设计:一项针对冠心病合并高血压患者的基于互联网的随机试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Nov;32(5):1228-37. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00423-9.
10
Blood pressure control and cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk Hispanic patients--findings from the International Verapamil SR/Trandolapril Study (INVEST).高危西班牙裔患者的血压控制与心血管结局——国际维拉帕米缓释片/群多普利研究(INVEST)的结果
Am Heart J. 2006 May;151(5):1072-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.05.024.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying patterns of high intraoperative blood pressure variability in noncardiac surgery using explainable machine learning: a retrospective cohort study.使用可解释机器学习识别非心脏手术中术中血压高变异性模式:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2537920. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2537920. Epub 2025 Jul 24.
2
Association of HDL-C levels with all-cause mortality in ACS patients after PCI: a multicenter prospective cohort study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠状动脉综合征患者高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平与全因死亡率的关联:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究
Heart Vessels. 2025 Jun 24. doi: 10.1007/s00380-025-02568-w.
3
Blood Pressure Variability and Risk of Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in Real-World Clinical Settings.

本文引用的文献

1
Disparities in the Population at Risk of Severe Illness From COVID-19 by Race/Ethnicity and Income.按种族/族裔和收入划分的新冠重症风险人群差异
Am J Prev Med. 2020 Jul;59(1):137-139. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.04.003. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
2
Sars-CoV-2 and black population: ACE2 as shield or blade?严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2与黑人人群:血管紧张素转换酶2是盾牌还是利刃?
Infect Genet Evol. 2020 Oct;84:104361. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104361. Epub 2020 May 13.
3
Racial variations in COVID-19 deaths may be due to androgen receptor genetic variants associated with prostate cancer and androgenetic alopecia. Are anti-androgens a potential treatment for COVID-19?
现实临床环境中的血压变异性与心血管事件及死亡风险
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Jun 3;14(11):e037658. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.037658. Epub 2025 May 26.
4
Time in Target Range of Systolic Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Korean Nationwide Cohort Study.慢性肾脏病患者收缩压处于目标范围内的时间与心血管疾病:一项韩国全国性队列研究
Am J Nephrol. 2025 May 19:1-12. doi: 10.1159/000546380.
5
Systolic blood pressure variability: risk of cardiovascular events, chronic kidney disease, dementia, and death.收缩压变异性:心血管事件、慢性肾脏病、痴呆和死亡的风险。
Eur Heart J. 2025 Jul 14;46(27):2673-2687. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf256.
6
Association of systolic blood pressure target and variability with long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的收缩压目标值及变异性与长期临床结局的关联
Clin Hypertens. 2025 Apr 1;31:e13. doi: 10.5646/ch.2025.31.e13. eCollection 2025.
7
Blood pressure variability associated with in-hospital and 30-day mortality in heart failure patients: a multicenter cohort study.心力衰竭患者的血压变异性与住院及30天死亡率的关系:一项多中心队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 22;15(1):9911. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93384-9.
8
ACE Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers for the Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Outcomes: Recommendations from the 2024 Egyptian Cardiology Expert Consensus in Collaboration with the CVREP Foundation.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂用于心血管结局的一级和二级预防:2024年埃及心脏病学专家共识与CVREP基金会合作发布的建议
Cardiol Ther. 2024 Dec;13(4):707-736. doi: 10.1007/s40119-024-00381-6. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
9
Reliability of beat-to-beat blood pressure variability in older adults.老年人逐拍血压变异性的可靠性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 30;14(1):20197. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71183-y.
10
Higher intraindividual variability of body mass index is associated with elevated risk of COVID-19 related hospitalization and post-COVID conditions.个体内体重指数变异较大与 COVID-19 相关住院和新冠后状况的风险增加相关。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2024 Dec;48(12):1711-1719. doi: 10.1038/s41366-024-01603-6. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
新冠病毒死亡病例中的种族差异可能归因于与前列腺癌和雄激素性脱发相关的雄激素受体基因变异。抗雄激素药物能否成为新冠病毒病的潜在治疗手段?
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020 Jul;19(7):1542-1543. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13455. Epub 2020 Jun 14.
4
Association Between Visit-to-Visit Blood Pressure Variability in Early Adulthood and Myocardial Structure and Function in Later Life.成年早期血压变异性与晚年心肌结构和功能的关系。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Jul 1;5(7):795-801. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0799.
5
Blood Pressure Variability and Neurologic Outcome After Endovascular Thrombectomy: A Secondary Analysis of the BEST Study.血管内血栓切除术治疗后血压变异性与神经结局:BEST 研究的二次分析。
Stroke. 2020 Feb;51(2):511-518. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027549. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
6
The impact of systolic and diastolic blood pressure variability on mortality is age dependent: Data from the Dublin Outcome Study.收缩压和舒张压变异性对死亡率的影响具有年龄依赖性:来自都柏林结果研究的数据。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 Mar;27(4):355-364. doi: 10.1177/2047487319872572. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
7
Blood Pressure Variability and Arterial Stiffness-Chicken or Egg?血压变异性与动脉僵硬度——因果难定?
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Oct 1;4(10):1050. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.2730.
8
Risk Factor Variability and Cardiovascular Outcome: JACC Review Topic of the Week.风险因素变异性与心血管结局:JACC 本周综述专题
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 May 28;73(20):2596-2603. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.063.
9
Number of blood pressure measurements needed to estimate long-term visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability for predicting cardiovascular risk: a 10-year retrospective cohort study in a primary care clinic in Malaysia.需要多少次血压测量来估计长期随访收缩压变异性以预测心血管风险:马来西亚一家初级保健诊所的 10 年回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 20;9(4):e025322. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025322.
10
Visit-to-visit Blood Pressure Variability and Arterial Stiffness: Which Came First: The Chicken or the Egg?血压变异性与动脉僵硬度:孰因孰果?
Curr Pharm Des. 2019;25(6):685-692. doi: 10.2174/1381612825666190329122024.