Cantini Luca, Bastianelli Lucia, Lupi Alessio, Pinterpe Giada, Pecci Federica, Belletti Giovanni, Stoico Rosa, Vitarelli Francesca, Moretti Marco, Onori Nicoletta, Giampieri Riccardo, Rocchi Marco Bruno Luigi, Berardi Rossana
Rossana Berardi, Clinical Oncology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, A.O.U. Ospedali Riuniti, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
SOD Medicina di Laboratorio, A.O.U. Ospedali Riuniti, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 4;10(7):1503. doi: 10.3390/jcm10071503.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) seroprevalence in cancer patients may vary widely dependent on the geographic area and this has significant implications for oncological care. The aim of this observational, prospective study was to assess the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG antibodies in solid cancer patients referred to the academic institution of the Marche Region, Italy, between 1 July and 26 October 2020 and to determine the accuracy of the rapid serological test. After performing 3767 GCCOV-402a rapid serological tests on a total of 949 patients, seroconversion was initially observed in 13 patients (1.4%). Ten (77% of the total positive) were IgG-positive, 1 (8%) were IgM-positive and 2 (15%) IgM-positive/IgG-positive. However, only 7 out of 13 were confirmed as positive at the reference serological test (true positives), thus seroprevalence after cross-checking was 0.7%. No false negatives were reported. The kappa value of the consistency analysis was 0.71. Due to rapid serological test high false positive rate, its role in assessing seroconversion rate is limited, and the standard serological tests should remain the gold standard. However, as rapid test negative predictive value is high, GCCOV-402a may instead be useful to monitor patient immunity over time, thus helping to assist ongoing vaccination programs.
癌症患者中严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的血清流行率可能因地理区域而异,这对肿瘤护理具有重要意义。这项观察性前瞻性研究的目的是评估2020年7月1日至10月26日期间转诊至意大利马尔凯地区学术机构的实体癌患者中SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG抗体的血清流行率,并确定快速血清学检测的准确性。在对总共949名患者进行了3767次GCCOV-402a快速血清学检测后,最初在13名患者(1.4%)中观察到血清转化。其中10名(占总阳性的77%)为IgG阳性,1名(8%)为IgM阳性,2名(15%)为IgM阳性/I gG阳性。然而,13名患者中只有7名在参考血清学检测中被确认为阳性(真阳性),因此交叉核对后的血清流行率为0.7%。未报告假阴性。一致性分析的kappa值为0.71。由于快速血清学检测的假阳性率较高,其在评估血清转化率方面的作用有限,标准血清学检测仍应作为金标准。然而,由于快速检测的阴性预测值较高,GCCOV-402a反而可能有助于长期监测患者的免疫力,从而有助于推进正在进行的疫苗接种计划。